Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
Thread started 14 Feb 2017 (Tuesday) 13:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma 14/1.8 Art and 135/1.8 Art primes are coming!

 
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Feb 22, 2017 07:31 |  #31

Talley wrote in post #18281160 (external link)
The 85 art is already neck and neck with the 200 F2 as far as IQ goes. The 200 is barely.... barely... better. This 135 will match and/or exceed the 200 F2 performance.

I put this together showing the sigma MTF charts and what I do is compare them to the lens rental data to get a baseline of how they compare which led me to see the 85 Art was really sharp and this 135 will be even better.

What amazes me also is the fact the 14 out performs the 20 and the 24.
Hosted photo: posted by Talley in
./showthread.php?p=182​81160&i=i263008341
forum: Photography Industry News

I have no doubt the 135 will topple other 135's, it's just that I'm not too concerned about mtf's when it comes to my people lenses  :p

Among my favorites are a double gauss 50, samyang 85, neither are MTF kings. I was hoping for something more manageable in weight, since I may do some serious travel where weight is a very real concern, and I've already have heavy high MTF lenses for my landscape shooting, my other stuff has to be lightweight.

I'll still consider the 135, which I use for a lot of formal shooting, where weight is less of a concern.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rdalrt
Goldmember
Avatar
1,766 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 972
Joined Aug 2008
Location: The Great White North
     
Feb 23, 2017 16:07 |  #32

DreDaze wrote in post #18279902 (external link)
here's my random, based on nothing guesses at prices

14mm $1,200
24-70mm $1000
135mm $1100
100-400mm $600

Hope you are right on the 14mm. I fear it may be $1600+ though as there is nothing else to compete with it.


Just Sports Photographyexternal link
My Junk ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Feb 23, 2017 21:16 |  #33

No more than 1200 period. The 85 art set the top dog price because it has no competitor. The 14 could be high but the 135 needs to be 999 or less


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smythie
I wasn't even trying
3,785 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 713
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
     
Feb 23, 2017 21:33 |  #34

here in Aus, the 12-24A is around 25% more expensive than the 85A. I wouldn't be surprised to see the 14A at a similar price to the 12-24A


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Feb 23, 2017 22:01 |  #35

smythie wrote in post #18283336 (external link)
here in Aus, the 12-24A is around 25% more expensive than the 85A. I wouldn't be surprised to see the 14A at a similar price to the 12-24A

It'll never sell imho. 1199 max price for the 14 and 999 max for 135.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smythie
I wasn't even trying
3,785 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 713
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
     
Feb 23, 2017 22:07 |  #36

Yeah, the price of the 12-24A has me looking at used 14-24's first.

But people will buy an expensive 14mm with a f/1.8 aperture. Just not as many as would if the price was lower


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick3434
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 216
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Trespassing in South Florida
     
Feb 25, 2017 14:29 |  #37

Just saw Adoroma accepting pre orders on a 14 1.8, and I was like is this for apsc, and thankfully no, the one lens I have been waiting on is going to not just be a reality, but be 1.8? I can't wait to see the initial testing and reviews and I truly hope the price is 1200 range. This will be my next piece of glass for canon. The one upgrade my bag could use.


Everything is relative.
Gear: 6D, Unholy Trinity:twisted: (24Lii, sigma 50A, 135L), and for the other ends of the spectrum, sigmaEX 14mm2.8 and sigmaEX 100-300F4.
Fuji X-e2, Rokinon 8 2.8 Fisheye II, Fuji 14 2.8, Fuji 18-55, Fuji 23 1.4
FlikR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Post edited over 6 years ago by bobbyz. (2 edits in all)
     
Mar 01, 2017 09:15 |  #38

I am happy that I didn't buy the 200mm f2. I know one of the best but I think it needs an update. Wish 135mm f1.8 came with OS. Lot of nice options. Stick FF, APS-C or move to MF (Fuji).

Would have liked 135m f1.4 art also as that will definitely a wow lens. Not sure who heavy it would have been.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Mar 01, 2017 09:16 |  #39

Talley wrote in post #18278633 (external link)
Well put me down for the 14 and the 135

No Fuji MF?


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tommydigi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,916 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 844
Joined May 2010
Location: Chicago
     
Mar 01, 2017 09:20 |  #40

I'm very interested in the 14. I cannot understand why Canon does not make any wide APS-C primes like Fuji.


Website (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)
Fuji X100F • Canon EOS R6 Mark 2 • G7XII • RF 16 2.8 • RF 14-35 F4 L • RF 35 1.8 • RF 800 F11 • EF 24LII L • EF 50 L • EF 100 L • EF 135 L • EF 100-400 L II • 600EX II RT • 270 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Post edited over 6 years ago by bobbyz. (2 edits in all)
     
Mar 01, 2017 09:27 |  #41

Tommydigi wrote in post #18288778 (external link)
I'm very interested in the 14. I cannot understand why Canon does not make any wide APS-C primes like Fuji.

Canon is stuck like any big company and doing same old, same old. They better release new 135L with IS. BTW - Fuji doesn't have anything wider, only 14mm f2.8 and the 16mm f1.4 which aren't as wide on APS-C.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tommydigi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,916 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 844
Joined May 2010
Location: Chicago
     
Mar 01, 2017 09:44 |  #42

bobbyz wrote in post #18288788 (external link)
Canon is stuck like any big company and doing same old, same old. They better release new 135L with IS. BTW - Fuji doesn't have anything wider, only 14mm f2.8 and the 16mm f1.4 which aren't as wide on APS-C.

Well 14 is small and pretty wide compared to 24 which is Canons widest offering that I would consider tiny.

IS would be nice in the 135, I like the 100L much better than the old 100 macro because of the IS but still I love the 135L


Website (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)
Fuji X100F • Canon EOS R6 Mark 2 • G7XII • RF 16 2.8 • RF 14-35 F4 L • RF 35 1.8 • RF 800 F11 • EF 24LII L • EF 50 L • EF 100 L • EF 135 L • EF 100-400 L II • 600EX II RT • 270 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Mar 06, 2017 19:55 |  #43

bobbyz wrote in post #18288776 (external link)
No Fuji MF?

Mf lenses bore me.

Mf is just not for me I'm afraid to say.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Post edited over 6 years ago by DreDaze.
     
Mar 06, 2017 20:19 as a reply to  @ Talley's post |  #44

Medium format lenses bore you, or manual focus lenses?


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Mar 06, 2017 20:37 |  #45

DreDaze wrote in post #18293883 (external link)
Medium format lenses bore you, or manual focus lenses?

Medium Format. I get the big format benefits.... I really do. But for me I need an all around camera and people just don't get it always wanna talk me into sony or something else. The 5D4 is a 10 year camera for me.... it really is. Does everything I want it to great.

The only lens in that fuji lineup that looks interesting is the 110mm F2 but it's still only F2 at that mm... *cringe*


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,201 views & 3 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it and it is followed by 10 members.
Sigma 14/1.8 Art and 135/1.8 Art primes are coming!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Photography Industry News 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1287 guests, 155 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.