dont forget that the 5Dsr AA cancelation, so lenses will tend to look better on that camera vs other cameras.
Mar 22, 2017 12:52 | #16 dont forget that the 5Dsr AA cancelation, so lenses will tend to look better on that camera vs other cameras. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,730 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Mar 22, 2017 13:37 | #17 Charlie wrote in post #18308030 dont forget that the 5Dsr AA cancelation, so lenses will tend to look better on that camera vs other cameras. Interesting data point. Even the75-300 Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
That is a REALLY stark difference! https://www.flickr.com/photos/127590681@N03/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 22, 2017 13:49 | #19 gjl711 wrote in post #18302182 ...the 7DII, 7D, and every recent Dxxx cameraas their pixel density is even greater. That's just flat out wrong. The 5DsR and 7DII have essentially the same pixel density, which is higher than any other cameras in Canon's line-up. You are correct though that any theoretical resolving issues on the 5DsR should also show up on the 7DII (although the 7DII is working with the best part of the image, and the 5DsR is using the full image circle).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomReichner "That's what I do." 17,636 posts Gallery: 213 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 8384 Joined Dec 2008 Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot More info Post edited over 6 years ago by Tom Reichner. | Mar 22, 2017 16:21 | #20 gjl711 wrote in post #18308062 ......... the 5DsR while it looks terrible (as expected) on the 50D. Interesting that the pixel count is not that different between the two. Actually, pixel count is extremely different between the two. "Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 24, 2017 16:39 | #21 I remember some similar discussions when Kodak Technical Pan film hit the market. Turned out technique made all the difference in the world.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1153 guests, 188 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||