Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 28 Mar 2017 (Tuesday) 17:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Should I be shooting in Silent mode for maximum sharpness?

 
texshooter
Senior Member
652 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jun 2009
     
Mar 28, 2017 17:50 |  #1

Shooting with the mirror locked has always been advised to minimize vibration-induced image blur. But what about the focal plane shutters? Should I be shooting landscapes in Silent mode (ie, Live View>Silent Shoot>Mode 1 for my 5D Mark II) to reduce curtain vibration by half? Why haven't I heard anybody doing this?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Mar 28, 2017 17:54 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Because it mostly doesn't matter. You're shaving thin hairs. Unless you're doing semi-long exposures, or using slowish shutter speeds, the 'slap' of the mirror has a negligible effect on the sharpness. And the wider the focal length, the less it matters. Kinda like diffraction: only important to pixel-peepers.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
Post edited over 6 years ago by gjl711. (3 edits in all)
     
Mar 28, 2017 18:00 |  #3

All the moving stuff adds to blur but there are times it's minimal. The faster the shutter, the less the impact. MLU reduces it more. A wide lens makes it less noticeable as well, but it's still there. The below pic is a 100% crop of a long exposure image I took of the ISS at 17mm. Granted that this is a long exposure but you can clearly see how big the impact is in the first few MS. This was due to me forgetting to put the camera in MLU so most is from mirror slap,

IMAGE: https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5031/7423840590_8e7003e61f_b.jpg

Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texshooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
652 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jun 2009
     
Mar 28, 2017 18:10 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #4

I'm not talking about the mirror. I'm talking about the curtain. The mirror does not move while the sensor is exposing, but the curtains do. I would think the curtains can cause more vibration than the mirror. And because Silent mode (Live View>Silent Shoot>Mode 1) is suppose to use fewer curtain movements, I surmised that this mode can help reduce vibration. On the other hand, I suppose I would've heard about it by now if it really did make a difference.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Mar 28, 2017 18:28 |  #5

Shoot a satellite or plane at night and test it yourself. I would love to see the results. :)


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Mar 28, 2017 18:50 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

texshooter wrote in post #18313548 (external link)
[..] I would've heard about it by now if it really did make a difference.

This.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texshooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
652 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jun 2009
Post edited over 6 years ago by texshooter.
     
Mar 28, 2017 20:13 |  #7

gjl711 wrote in post #18313557 (external link)
Shoot a satellite or plane at night and test it yourself. I would love to see the results. :)

I just found this...

https://www.dpreview.c​om/forums/post/3547309​2 (external link)

Fortunately, somebody conducted a test already (a benefit of shooting with an older model camera). He proved that Live View>Silent Shoot>Mode 2 yields consistently sharper images than with Mirror Lockup alone.

So ya'll been settling for less and not knowing it. Like me until now.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Mar 28, 2017 22:17 |  #8

Awesome info. That second link (external link) shows it very clearly. However, this is in microscopy so even blowing on the camera is going to show results. :) I'm thinking that under landscape conditions, it will be much less noticeable.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Mar 28, 2017 22:37 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

gjl711 wrote in post #18313721 (external link)
Awesome info. That second link (external link) shows it very clearly. However, this is in microscopy so even blowing on the camera is going to show results. :) I'm thinking that under landscape conditions, it will be much less noticeable.

If at all...


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Mar 28, 2017 22:42 |  #10

Alveric wrote in post #18313736 (external link)
If at all...

I don't know, the rest of the article also shows a clear impact albeit at 400mm. Scroll down a bit farther.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davinci953
Senior Member
Avatar
406 posts
Likes: 315
Joined Dec 2011
     
Mar 28, 2017 23:39 |  #11

texshooter wrote in post #18313647 (external link)
I just found this...

https://www.dpreview.c​om/forums/post/3547309​2 (external link)

Fortunately, somebody conducted a test already (a benefit of shooting with an older model camera). He proved that Live View>Silent Shoot>Mode 2 yields consistently sharper images than with Mirror Lockup alone.

So ya'll been settling for less and not knowing it. Like me until now.

FWIW, I attended a Canon presentation a few years ago, and the presenter indicated that Silent Mode 1 gave the sharpest images with Silent Mode 2 being the quietest. I suppose it's easy enough to test what works best for you.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 6 years ago by Alveric. (2 edits in all)
     
Mar 29, 2017 00:34 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

davinci953 wrote in post #18313763 (external link)
[..] I suppose it's easy enough to test what works best for you.

Indeed; and some of us prefer to look through the viewfinder when making pictures.

I see no extra need for ultimate, punctilious sharpness here:

IMAGE: http://diamantstudios.ca/Gemeines/Bilder/Examples/Echo_Lake--001.jpg

100% crop with C1P sharpening:

IMAGE: http://diamantstudios.ca/Gemeines/Bilder/Examples/Echo_Lake--001-Sharp.jpg

100% crop with no software sharpening:

IMAGE: http://diamantstudios.ca/Gemeines/Bilder/Examples/Echo_Lake--001-No_Sharp.jpg

Can you see any difference in the actual picture? As in, any difference that matters to someone who ain't gonna zoom in to 100% or beyond? I can't. And I'm willing to bet to-day's martini that my viewers (non-photographers) can't either, or would care if they saw any.

I can understand the quest for image excellence. But, like many other things, we can develop an obsession with every little thing.

'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
monty28428
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,123 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 253
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Carolina Beach
     
Mar 29, 2017 00:37 |  #13

Yeah but then we would not got those cool cork screws like JJ got!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
Avatar
6,772 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 10455
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Florida
Post edited over 6 years ago by saea501.
     
Mar 29, 2017 07:07 |  #14

Seems pretty minimal on mine.

This one was at 24mm, 2 second delay, 25 seconds....big crop. ISS.

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2831/33333541360_47d3f8d6bd_b_d.jpg

Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/147975282@N06 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texshooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
652 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jun 2009
     
Mar 29, 2017 10:00 |  #15

Alveric wrote in post #18313774 (external link)
I see no extra need for ultimate, punctilious sharpness here:
.

Your sample image was shot withe a TS-E lens which won't work in silent mode anyway. Does anybody known why?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,605 views & 8 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Should I be shooting in Silent mode for maximum sharpness?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1034 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.