Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 03 Apr 2017 (Monday) 10:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Yosemite first week in May

 
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,257 posts
Likes: 1526
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
Post edited over 6 years ago by John from PA.
     
Apr 04, 2017 07:52 |  #31

samueli wrote in post #18318290 (external link)
Hi,

I have:
Tokina 11-16 - which is limited on the 5DII because it hits something (forgot which end)

On some lenses the rear element can hit the mirror and cause serious problems. That is not to say the Tokina is one of those lenses but see the thread at https://www.dpreview.c​om/forums/thread/31176​20 (external link) and in particular the 2nd response by "wallybarthman" on how you can test the lens. Read the balance of the thread for some other limitations.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Avatar
3,386 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 409
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Apr 04, 2017 08:49 |  #32

samueli wrote in post #18318290 (external link)
Hi,

Wow, this place has changed!

Anyway, Yosemite coming up and will have a 6-moth old child on my back most of the time, so I only want to carry one lens, maybe (maybe) two. I'm grabbing landscape shots only.

I have a 5DIII (I see the 5dIV is out, but haven't taken a picture in a year, phht).

I have:
Tokina 11-16 - which is limited on the 5DII because it hits something (forgot which end)
Canon 24mm prime 1.8 or 1.4
Canon 70-200 2.8

Thinking about buying the Canon 24-70, but that's a lot of money for one trip. Although could sell the 70-200, since I have little use for it. It's like 5 years old or more by now though.

Greatly and humbly appreciate opinions.

Sam.
Which 70-200 do you have, the 70-200 f/2.8 L, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS Version 1 or the 70-200 f/2.8 L IS Mark II?


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Elton ­ Balch
Senior Member
Avatar
972 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 86
Joined Dec 2005
     
Apr 04, 2017 09:19 |  #33

samueli wrote in post #18319042 (external link)
I actually don't know what to expect. I'm generally the type to get into the action, but kid and greater than everage snow fall, plus, I've never been to yosemite. So I have no idea what to expect.

Go to google maps and search "Yosemite national park". I tried to put the link in, but the format wasn't acceptable when I tried to post it.

There are 200 photos including some 360 degree views.

Flickr is another site to go to. This will give you a good idea of what to expect in terms of photo opportunities.

https://www.flickr.com …osemite%20natio​nal%20park (external link)

Here is a search of this site in the landscape forum for yosemite; there should be lots of photos with metadata which will tell you what lenses others were using to take the photos.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/forumdis​play.php?f=28

Hope this helps!


Elton Balch
5D Mark III, 7D Mark II, 24 mm f/1.4 L, 35 mm f/1.4 L, 50 mm f/1.2 L, 85 mm f/1.2 L, 100 mm f/2.8 macro, 135 mm f/2 L, 300 mm f/4 L, 16-35 f/4 L IS, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 24-105 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS ii, 580 EX Flash, Speedlight 600 EX RT, 1.4 extender, extension tubes and other stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
samueli
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,033 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 150
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Macomb County, Michigan, USA
     
Apr 04, 2017 10:00 as a reply to  @ Nick5's post |  #34

70-200 f/2.8 L IS Version 1




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tapeman
Sliced Bread
Avatar
3,723 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Twin Cities
     
Apr 04, 2017 10:21 |  #35

When carrying only one lens(which is rare) I'll take my 24-105.

I would suggest finding a way to have more with you.


Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
Gitzo 1228, 1275, 1558, Lensbaby 3G. Epson 3880, Bags that match my shoes.:)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bpalermini
Goldmember
Avatar
1,801 posts
Gallery: 197 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1295
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Ashland, Oregon
     
Apr 04, 2017 10:59 |  #36

I've been to Yosemite a number of times. To me, it is one of the most beautiful places on earth and being there in May should provide great waterfall flow.

My most used lens is my 24-70, second is 16-35 and third is 70-200. A 24-105 would work great for a lot of the type of photos I take though I would like to have something wider. I could live without a 70-200. f4 would be fine for all the lenses.

My photos are HERE (external link) and HERE (external link) if you think seeing them might help you decide.


Bob
R6II, R6, EF 16-35L II 2.8, EF 24-70L II 2.8, RF 50 1.8, EF 100L Macro 2.8, RF 70-200L 2.8, EF 100-400L II, EF 200-400L 4, EF 1.4xIII, EF 2xIII, 580EXII, YN560IV, RRS TVC23 + BH55, Fuji X-E2, Fuji X30, LRCC, PSCC
My Web Site (external link) | My Sports Portfolio (external link) | Instagram @bobpal

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
samueli
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,033 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 150
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Macomb County, Michigan, USA
     
Apr 05, 2017 08:10 as a reply to  @ bpalermini's post |  #37

Thank you for all the links of images and advice! I appreciate every bit.

I don't know if it's a good decision, but I'm now leaning towards two lenses: my 70-200 and a rented 16-35. I don't think the missing 35 to 70 in the middle is going to ruin anything for me. this is all preliminary of course.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,893 views & 4 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Yosemite first week in May
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1341 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.