Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Apr 2017 (Wednesday) 05:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

80D 45-point automatic selection AF issues

 
Warl0rd
Goldmember
Avatar
2,230 posts
Likes: 153
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Portugal
Post edited over 6 years ago by Warl0rd.
     
Apr 12, 2017 05:50 |  #1

I recently bought a Canon 80D and I'm having issues using the "45-point automatic selection AF" in One Shot mode on a static landscape.

The camera focus on the closest subject (as it is supposed according to the manual), but also highlights AF points all across the frame over subjects that are further away and completely out of the DoF. This viewfinder AF points highlight leads me to believe that those areas will be sharp, when they are clearly not.

AF points:

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/04/2/LQ_850142.jpg
Image hosted by forum (850142) © Warl0rd [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
Full Image here to judge focus on all highlighted AF points: https://s3.postimg.org​/jr3d2pylt/45pt_AF.jpg (external link)

If I use 1 point AF or 3x3, the camera/lens focus accurately on closer or infinite subjects (this case).
IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/04/2/LQ_850143.jpg
Image hosted by forum (850143) © Warl0rd [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
Full Image here to judge focus on the selected AF point: https://s21.postimg.or​g/aexg1lph1/1pt_AF.jpg (external link)

Since I'm upgrading from a 450D which has a much simpler AF system (9 pts only), I don't know if this is the expected behavior on a high #AF points camera (in that case I'll stick with 1pt AF or 3x3 AF points which seem to work fine), or if something is wrong with my camera (and it needs servicing). This behavior happens with multiple lenses.

Please note, I'm not complaining the camera didn't focused on infinite, I know it should focus on the closest subject anywhere on the area (which might or might not be the place I wanted), I'm complaining for those AF points clearly out of focus that also become highlighted.
To me what would make sense was to highlight only the AF points over the right chimney. Whats the point of highlighting the AF points on the left of the frame if nothing there is really focused?

Does anyone experienced similar behavior with the automatic selection AF area mode on landscape photography?

Thanks!

Paulo
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/warl0rd (external link)
Canon 450D (XSi) + Grip | Canon 80D | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 100mm Macro | MP-E 65mm 1-5X | EF-S 18-55 IS STM | EF-S 55-250 IS | Takumar 55mm 1.8 | MT-24EX | Metz 48-AF1 | YN460 II | Kenko DG Auto ET | Kata 3N1-20 DL | Lowepro SlingShot 100 AW | Mitsai JDC195 | Manfrotto 190XPROB + 484RC2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
Avatar
6,772 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 10455
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Florida
     
Apr 12, 2017 06:29 |  #2

This is why I don't use automatic anything.

Especially in a busy landscape like this. The camera has no clue what you want it to focus on.


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/147975282@N06 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Warl0rd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,230 posts
Likes: 153
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Portugal
     
Apr 12, 2017 06:32 as a reply to  @ saea501's post |  #3

I'm not complaining about it not choosing the spot I wanted to AF, I'm complaining about it telling me that 35 AF points got focus when they didn't... is this normal?


Paulo
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/warl0rd (external link)
Canon 450D (XSi) + Grip | Canon 80D | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 100mm Macro | MP-E 65mm 1-5X | EF-S 18-55 IS STM | EF-S 55-250 IS | Takumar 55mm 1.8 | MT-24EX | Metz 48-AF1 | YN460 II | Kenko DG Auto ET | Kata 3N1-20 DL | Lowepro SlingShot 100 AW | Mitsai JDC195 | Manfrotto 190XPROB + 484RC2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Apr 12, 2017 06:37 |  #4

The camera determined that your DOF covered 100m to infinity, so those points were used during focusing and were considered in focus.

You are looking at where you think critical focus ended up, but since you used all AF points, the camera is considering everything in the focal plane.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Warl0rd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,230 posts
Likes: 153
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Portugal
     
Apr 12, 2017 07:30 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #5

But if we open the picture link (full size jpg) the DOF clearly does not extends to infinity. It does not even extends to the white building in the middle/bottom of the frame or the highest TV antenna on the center!

Only on the second picture (single point AF) the infinity is focused...


Paulo
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/warl0rd (external link)
Canon 450D (XSi) + Grip | Canon 80D | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 100mm Macro | MP-E 65mm 1-5X | EF-S 18-55 IS STM | EF-S 55-250 IS | Takumar 55mm 1.8 | MT-24EX | Metz 48-AF1 | YN460 II | Kenko DG Auto ET | Kata 3N1-20 DL | Lowepro SlingShot 100 AW | Mitsai JDC195 | Manfrotto 190XPROB + 484RC2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Apr 12, 2017 07:50 |  #6

Looking at the two images in the thread above, they both seem about equally sharp at infinity. The camera also has a tolerance for what it displays as being "sharp enough". That's normally not the same as "looks sharp when viewed enlarged by many percent".


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Warl0rd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,230 posts
Likes: 153
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Portugal
Post edited over 6 years ago by Warl0rd. (2 edits in all)
     
Apr 12, 2017 08:16 as a reply to  @ apersson850's post |  #7

@apersson850 I will have to agree with you that seeing both images at 1000px width they look identical. But if you bump it to 1600px you will start noticing the differences.

My issue here is the viewfinder highlighting AF points that are not properly focused, being highlighted would lead me to believe that portion of the image is reasonable sharp...

If I look at the AF points there were highlighted I would say I could crop the bottom left quarter of the image, and it would be reasonably sharp 3000x2000 image. It isn't, its not acceptable to crop that portion and print it, its all blurry!

PS: But bottomline, I'm just trying to understand if something is wrong with my camera or this is just the way it works (even if I think its wrong).


Paulo
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/warl0rd (external link)
Canon 450D (XSi) + Grip | Canon 80D | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 100mm Macro | MP-E 65mm 1-5X | EF-S 18-55 IS STM | EF-S 55-250 IS | Takumar 55mm 1.8 | MT-24EX | Metz 48-AF1 | YN460 II | Kenko DG Auto ET | Kata 3N1-20 DL | Lowepro SlingShot 100 AW | Mitsai JDC195 | Manfrotto 190XPROB + 484RC2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited over 6 years ago by MalVeauX. (3 edits in all)
     
Apr 12, 2017 09:16 |  #8

It's blurry where you're looking because you shot at F4 with a 105mm. You didn't have enough depth of field for a distance that vast at that magnification.

Camera's working fine. AF system is working appropriately.

The F4 bit is user error and dictated most of what you're having an issue with. You'd have never even cared what it focused on, if you were at F8 or F11 for a landscape instead of F4 (wide open, softest possible focal-ratio for the lens with the least depth of field for any focal length the lens has as an option).

+++++

Image one, it grabbed foreground contrast lines for focus, but the background is more blurry and less defined because your focal-ratio is F4 (wide open, the softest focal-ratio you could possibly use on this lens) and depth of field is limited. Combine those two things and you get a soft image covering this kind of distance at this focal length.

Image two, it grabbed background, so its what's in focus, and because you are again at F4, the foreground is out of focus because it's out of the depth of field produced from F4 at 105mm.

The camera did everything right.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Apr 12, 2017 09:18 |  #9
bannedPermanently

Do you get the same results if you look at the images in DPP?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Inspeqtor
I was hit more than 15 times
Avatar
15,623 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Likes: 8215
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Apr 12, 2017 09:27 |  #10

Warl0rd, (or anyone else who may know the answer to my question)

How are you able to show us in the images where your focus points are with the individual squares in the photos?

I would assume the same would be possible in my 60D?

Thank you


Charles
Canon EOS 90D * Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM* Flickr Account (external link)
Tokina AT-X Pro DX 11-20 f/2.8 * Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM Contemporary
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Apr 12, 2017 09:31 |  #11
bannedPermanently

Inspeqtor wrote in post #18325938 (external link)
Warl0rd, (or anyone else who may know the answer to my question)

How are you able to show us in the images where your focus points are with the individual squares in the photos?

I would assume the same would be possible in my 60D?

Thank you

You can do it in DPP.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Apr 12, 2017 09:39 |  #12

Inspeqtor wrote in post #18325938 (external link)
Warl0rd, (or anyone else who may know the answer to my question)

How are you able to show us in the images where your focus points are with the individual squares in the photos?

I would assume the same would be possible in my 60D?

Thank you

Alt+L in DPP.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Warl0rd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,230 posts
Likes: 153
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Portugal
Post edited over 6 years ago by Warl0rd.
     
Apr 12, 2017 10:08 |  #13

MalVeauX wrote in post #18325931 (external link)
It's blurry where you're looking because you shot at F4 with a 105mm. You didn't have enough depth of field for a distance that vast at that magnification.

Camera's working fine. AF system is working appropriately.

The F4 bit is user error and dictated most of what you're having an issue with. You'd have never even cared what it focused on, if you were at F8 or F11 for a landscape instead of F4 (wide open, softest possible focal-ratio for the lens with the least depth of field for any focal length the lens has as an option).

+++++

Image one, it grabbed foreground contrast lines for focus, but the background is more blurry and less defined because your focal-ratio is F4 (wide open, the softest focal-ratio you could possibly use on this lens) and depth of field is limited. Combine those two things and you get a soft image covering this kind of distance at this focal length.

Image two, it grabbed background, so its what's in focus, and because you are again at F4, the foreground is out of focus because it's out of the depth of field produced from F4 at 105mm.

The camera did everything right.

Very best,

I know shooting at f/4 will give a shallow DOF (for a landscape shot I would probably use something around f/8-11 like you said) and also using the lens wide will never give me the sharpest result for the lens, but I did it on purpose to illustrate the issue in a more evident way (if I had 2.8 I would had used it instead).

What doesn't make sense to me is the camera highlighting background AF points that will not appear focused on the final image, if after taking this picture I switch to 1 point AF and place it over the background, the lens will even change values on the distance scale window, so how could it highlight that AF point previously on a different distance value!? I would expect it to highlight only AF points that are over the DoF line for f/4 at the closest subject distance the camera determined, e.g. changing to 1 point AF and refocusing there would return to the same lens distance scale value.

Exaggerating the problem it would be like highlighting an AF point on a background for a portrait taken at f/1.2, because if I close the lens enough eventually the background would also become focused...

What I would expect would be the right column AF points to highlight (over the chimney since it seems to be focused), and no other AF points to show since they are not at the same distance and not on the DoF line for that apperture.

john crossley wrote in post #18325934 (external link)
Do you get the same results if you look at the images in DPP?

I don't have DPP installed, but on the camera it shows the same AF points highlighted (you can overlay them when you replay the images).


That many highlighted AF points that won't be sharp on the final image takes away any confidence on which one the camera focused and where the DOF will be when I review the image at home. I don't want to spend 1 minute after taking each shot zooming and scrolling thru the image on the LCD to see if its focused or not, making this AF area mode completely useless for landscape.

Inspeqtor wrote in post #18325938 (external link)
Warl0rd, (or anyone else who may know the answer to my question)

How are you able to show us in the images where your focus points are with the individual squares in the photos?

I would assume the same would be possible in my 60D?

Thank you

I did it on lightroom with this plugin (its free): http://www.lightroomfo​cuspointsplugin.com/ (external link)

You can do it on DPP as mentioned (also free). On the 80D you can also display them on the LCD when reviewing the images.


Paulo
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/warl0rd (external link)
Canon 450D (XSi) + Grip | Canon 80D | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 100mm Macro | MP-E 65mm 1-5X | EF-S 18-55 IS STM | EF-S 55-250 IS | Takumar 55mm 1.8 | MT-24EX | Metz 48-AF1 | YN460 II | Kenko DG Auto ET | Kata 3N1-20 DL | Lowepro SlingShot 100 AW | Mitsai JDC195 | Manfrotto 190XPROB + 484RC2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Colin ­ Glover
Goldmember
1,376 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 133
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Southport nr Liverpool United Kingdom
     
Apr 12, 2017 10:11 |  #14

What's the difference between a white line around inside of focus point and a black line? I've never seen it before


Canon EOS 70D, Canon EOS 600D, EF-S 18-55 ii, EF 55-200 USM ii, EF-S 75-300 iii, Tamron 28-80, Sigma 70-210. Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, EF-S 55-250, Raynox Macro adapter, Neewer filters (CPL, UV, FLD & ND4), Fuji HS20 EXR (30X zoom ) & cable release, Yongnuo 560 iii & Luxon 9800A manual flashguns for the Fuji, Hama Star 63 tripod, Hongdek RC-6 remote control, Velbon DF 40 www.point-n-shoot.co.uk website.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Warl0rd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,230 posts
Likes: 153
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Portugal
     
Apr 12, 2017 10:17 as a reply to  @ Colin Glover's post |  #15

If you're talking about the squares of the lightroom plugin, you have the legend on the right.


Paulo
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/warl0rd (external link)
Canon 450D (XSi) + Grip | Canon 80D | EF-S 10-22 | EF 24-105 L IS | EF 100mm Macro | MP-E 65mm 1-5X | EF-S 18-55 IS STM | EF-S 55-250 IS | Takumar 55mm 1.8 | MT-24EX | Metz 48-AF1 | YN460 II | Kenko DG Auto ET | Kata 3N1-20 DL | Lowepro SlingShot 100 AW | Mitsai JDC195 | Manfrotto 190XPROB + 484RC2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

27,294 views & 11 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it and it is followed by 6 members.
80D 45-point automatic selection AF issues
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1093 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.