Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
Thread started 22 Apr 2017 (Saturday) 12:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sony A9 vs Canon 1DXII

 
idkdc
Goldmember
Avatar
3,230 posts
Likes: 409
Joined Oct 2014
Post edited over 6 years ago by idkdc. (9 edits in all)
     
Apr 22, 2017 12:50 |  #1

I own several 1DXII cameras and would like to evaluate pros and cons in direct comparison to the new Sony camera of specs and practical differences from working professionals' and advanced amateurs' perspectives.

I am very interested in the silent shutter, how its video quality compares, lens ecosystem compares (in price nd quality) with equivalent lenses, etc.

Considering the A9 as a supplement to current kit.

What are your thoughts? Canon and Sony users both invited.


---
1DXII limitations:
- 4K video at 60p is 800 Mbps, 24p is 500 Mbps; no compressed codec for memory card and hard drive cheapsters
- two different card types with different read write speeds
- 14 fps with continuous tracking, 16 without

A9 limitations:
- two different card types and read write speeds (uhsii vs uhs I)
- 12 fps with raw files? Lossless raw files? Not sure about this one
- 10 fps with metabones adapter
- no lossless compressed raw files


I like big cinema cameras and I can not lie
You other brothers can't deny

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 6 years ago by Wilt. (4 edits in all)
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:00 |  #2

It is healthy for us to understand not only the benefits, but also the limitations of gear. Nothing is perfect.
When the 5D Mk IV was launched, it was widely discussed, and the result was that many Canon owners decided that the 5DIV did not bring enough to the table to upgrade from their existing kit. Others came to a different decision.
It is good to question, it encourages exploration and better understanding. Just recently I questioned why Canon would offer a camera with focus good down to EV-3, yet it has a meter stated by Canon to be good only down to EV0...odd, you cannot meter in very dim light that you can focus a shot?! So I did a test and found that Canon merely failed to include a spec for metering that was accurate...I could meter in the same EV-3 light as I could focus in (yet barely see in, to operate the camera!)
Hopefully this thread can be objective discussion, and not a series of antagonism or perceived antagonism and subjectivism...in either direction!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
Post edited over 6 years ago by Charlie.
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:03 |  #3

20 fps demo, electronic shutter is not necessarily silent, you can set it to have an audio signal if desired.





AF comparison at 3:51



Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idkdc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,230 posts
Likes: 409
Joined Oct 2014
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:11 as a reply to  @ Charlie's post |  #4

So no mirror blackout is a function only for electronic shutter, correct? And flash only works with mechanical? I wonder, are there differences in tracking with mechanical blackout vs electronic without blackout? 10 or 12 FPS ES vs 5FPS in MS and RAW compressed or uncompressed files?


I like big cinema cameras and I can not lie
You other brothers can't deny

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nekrosoft13
Goldmember
Avatar
4,087 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 683
Joined Jun 2010
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:12 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

Charlie wrote in post #18334892 (external link)
20 fps demo, electronic shutter is not necessarily silent, you can set it to have an audio signal if desired.





AF comparison at 3:51


AF performance looks amazing :)


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idkdc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,230 posts
Likes: 409
Joined Oct 2014
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:15 |  #6

What about autofocus in low light? Does the camera sample at whatever aperture you set it at or a preset aperture?

What about exposure equivalence? I get the feeling that my fujifilm's t stops let in less light than my canon's at same ISO and exposures. Is this true of Sony as well?


I like big cinema cameras and I can not lie
You other brothers can't deny

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nekrosoft13
Goldmember
Avatar
4,087 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 683
Joined Jun 2010
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:18 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

idkdc wrote in post #18334903 (external link)
What about autofocus in low light? Does the camera sample at whatever aperture you set it at or a preset aperture?

What about exposure equivalence? I get the feeling that my fujifilm's t stops let in less light than my canon's at same ISO and exposures. Is this true of Sony as well?

a9 has af sensibility of -3ev, low light AF should be fine.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idkdc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,230 posts
Likes: 409
Joined Oct 2014
Post edited over 6 years ago by idkdc. (2 edits in all)
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:26 |  #8

nekrosoft13 wrote in post #18334908 (external link)
a9 has af sensibility of -3ev, low light AF should be fine.

My XT2 has -3ev too. Its viewfinder is dark in a studio though and focus can hunt in the same situations where my 1DXII will hit focus. Does that have to do with the aperture that the camera is sampling focus at and generating live view through the viewfinder? Is there a setting to fix this on Fujifilm or Sony (if it is similar) or is it a physical limitation of EVF's?


I like big cinema cameras and I can not lie
You other brothers can't deny

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited over 6 years ago by Wilt. (11 edits in all)
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:27 |  #9

Tony Northrup seems a offer a good, nicely balanced and realistic set of impressions about the strengths in the very awesome specs and capabilities of the camera, as well as even the ability to see what trade-offs there are, even vs. another Sony camera...not overly gushing and one-sided yet certainly impressed

https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=B7Z9ZvIZ2VE (external link)


  • He addresses a question raised about whether the electronic shutter would exhibit any of the 'rolling shutter' phenomenon (question raise by a POTN member recently)...no rolling shutter!
  • AF calculations (and AE calculations) happen at 60 times per second, even during 20 fps shooting.
  • blackout free viewing,and totally silent captures!
  • Apparently the DR of the A7RII is a bit better than the A9; along with the higher pixel count in the A7RII, one has to make a choice of 'DR+Pixels camera vs. faster camera with dual fast-SD cards and joystick' one is forced to prioritize between.
  • X-sync is at 1/250, faster than most FF cameras.
  • The classic beef among Sony users about battery drain is addressed both with 2x more life in a single battery, and in a grip option that holds 2 of the new battery.
  • He commented about AF during video...'not great' it hunted a bit and was not as good as the dual-AF cameras.
  • The HDMI connectors are 'micro' sized, which he hates.


The included interview with a Sony rep positions the A9 as the 'fast camera, built for speed...high speed sports and wildlife and action' while other Sony models are more oriented to 'super high sensitivity' or 'best for video'.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8386
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:30 |  #10

.
Does anyone know if the A9 will deliver the 20 frames per second if you use a Canon super telephoto, mounted via adaptor, while AF tracking rapidly moving subjects?

I have some doubt of this, due to things I read, but the things I read weren't really clear - they weren't even written in full sentence form - so I am left not knowing if it will deliver the full 20 FPS in situations when it is most needed.

Also, is it true that the 20 FPS will not work when shooting RAW?

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idkdc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,230 posts
Likes: 409
Joined Oct 2014
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:43 |  #11

Tom Reichner wrote in post #18334919 (external link)
.
Does anyone know if the A9 will deliver the 20 frames per second if you use a Canon super telephoto, mounted via adaptor, while AF tracking rapidly moving subjects?

I have some doubt of this, due to things I read, but the things I read weren't really clear - they weren't even written in full sentence form - so I am left not knowing if it will deliver the full 20 FPS in situations when it is most needed.

Also, is it true that the 20 FPS will not work when shooting RAW?

.

I don't know the answer, but t I'm starting a comparison list in my original post.


I like big cinema cameras and I can not lie
You other brothers can't deny

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:44 |  #12

idkdc wrote in post #18334913 (external link)
My XT2 has -3ev too. Its viewfinder is dark in a studio though and focus can hunt in the same situations where my 1DXII will hit focus. Does that have to do with the aperture that the camera is sampling focus at and generating live view through the viewfinder? Is there a setting to fix this on Fujifilm or Sony (if it is similar) or is it a physical limitation of EVF's?

depends on lens, there was a debate on that issue on FM forums. Some lenses focus wide open, some stopped down. Kind of sad there's no consistency on the issue. Adapted lenses focus wide open. I think most of the newer lenses trend to focus wide open. There's a live view setting for that.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:45 |  #13

Tom Reichner wrote in post #18334919 (external link)
.
Does anyone know if the A9 will deliver the 20 frames per second if you use a Canon super telephoto, mounted via adaptor, while AF tracking rapidly moving subjects?

I have some doubt of this, due to things I read, but the things I read weren't really clear - they weren't even written in full sentence form - so I am left not knowing if it will deliver the full 20 FPS in situations when it is most needed.

Also, is it true that the 20 FPS will not work when shooting RAW?

.

only 10, but using the special mode with metabones adapter, I'm guessing 20fps is achievable, but the AF will be poor in that special mode. Not sure about raw vs jpeg.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idkdc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,230 posts
Likes: 409
Joined Oct 2014
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:45 |  #14

Wilt wrote in post #18334914 (external link)
Tony Northrup seems a offer a good, nicely balanced and realistic set of impressions about the strengths in the very awesome specs and capabilities of the camera, as well as even the ability to see what trade-offs there are, even vs. another Sony camera...not overly gushing and one-sided yet certainly impressed

https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=B7Z9ZvIZ2VE (external link)

He addresses a question raised about whether the electronic shutter would exhibit any of the 'rolling shutter' phenomenon (question raise by a POTN member recently)...no rolling shutter!
Apparently the DR of the A7RII is a bit better than the A9. Along with the higher pixel count in the A7RII, one has to make a choice of 'DR+Pixels camera vs. faster camera with dual SD cards and joystick' one is forced to prioritize between.
He comment about AF during focus...it hunted a bit

Interesting. I can't really view video right now, so thank you for summarizing a little. I didn't notice that much of an improvement with the A7S in low light (high ISO's). Does Tony compare the A9 to the A7S cameras?


I like big cinema cameras and I can not lie
You other brothers can't deny

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
idkdc
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,230 posts
Likes: 409
Joined Oct 2014
Post edited over 6 years ago by idkdc.
     
Apr 22, 2017 13:47 |  #15

Charlie wrote in post #18334941 (external link)
depends on lens, there was a debate on that issue on FM forums. Some lenses focus wide open, some stopped down. Kind of sad there's no consistency on the issue. Adapted lenses focus wide open. I think most of the newer lenses trend to focus wide open. There's a live view setting for that.

Thanks for the reply!

Are there consistencies within each lens model or copy to copy variation?


I like big cinema cameras and I can not lie
You other brothers can't deny

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

25,196 views & 44 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it and it is followed by 10 members.
Sony A9 vs Canon 1DXII
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Vs. Camera 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1454 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.