Scrumhalf wrote in post #18344300
I went ahead and ordered a few mats to test out. I did a 12x18 opening in an 18x24 mat in a slightly muted white. This should work perfectly with a 13x19 print with a 1/2 inch border. Damn things were expensive though when not buying in bulk. They cost about $10 each including shipping. Prices drop when I order large numbers, but I only got 3 to test out.
Tell me about it, Those cheap frames I mentioned using went through a phase where they started cutting the mat openings at exactly 16×12, instead of the approx 15.5×11.5 that they should be. The prints just fall through the hole, and they are completely useless. I ended up having to go to Hobbycraft for replacement mats for a couple of prints that were gifts, the mats ended up costing £9.99, to go in a £7.50 frame.
DaviSto Those Wilkinson frames are OK as long as you are careful in picking the right one from the shelf. They have some that are made from that very cheap MDF like stuff, but they do also seem to have some that are real "softwood", which are the ones I now try to go for. It is a shame that they stopped using glass for the framing, it definitely looks better than the rather thin perspex they are now putting them in. Anyway it really pays to give them a good close inspection in store to make sure they don't have any damage, a lot seem to get dinged corners, and sometimes even the joints can be a bit iffy too. But what can you expect at £7.50 a time for a complete 16×20 frame.
The local Clas Ohlson store that opened in Norwich also had a range of slightly better quality frames, for not much more, about £15 for the same size, and they also had mats and other bits in there too, and at good prices. But they have now closed in Norwich. Dunelm are also probably worth a look too, at least for complete frames off the shelf.
Personally being disabled I don't have a lot to spend on this, so I use them anyway. I don't have a lot of friends that are into art etc. so most people that see them on the wall think they look really good. Hopefully they are looking at the photo anyway, not the frame.
Alan