bigger than i thought and a only a few grams lighter than the 24-70L II.
on zenfolio
edrader "I am not the final word"  More info | Jun 08, 2017 17:20 | #1 bigger than i thought and a only a few grams lighter than the 24-70L II. on zenfoliohttp://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JarvisCreativeStudios Goldmember  More info | Jun 08, 2017 17:21 | #2 But isn't it the best in the business in the 16-35mm range? WEBSITE
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader THREAD STARTER "I am not the final word" More info Post edited over 6 years ago by ed rader. (2 edits in all) | yes. canon wide angle zooms -- 16-35L f4, 11-24 and 16-35L III -- are the best made. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JarvisCreativeStudios Goldmember More info | Jun 08, 2017 17:30 | #4 Yea i've heard that version III is amazing! WEBSITE
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 08, 2017 20:17 | #5 Wow it's that much bigger than the 24-70/2.8 II but it still weighs less? Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yep. but it's only a few grams so it's a wash http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 08, 2017 21:09 | #7 Filter size 82mm? Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yes http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewK Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 09, 2017 04:58 | #9 Huge lens, but optically it's razor/pin/tack/needle sharp.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
notastockpikr Senior Member 440 posts Likes: 73 Joined Aug 2011 Location: Canada More info Post edited over 6 years ago by notastockpikr. | Jun 09, 2017 07:11 | #10 Looked at one at a local camera store. It is a monster for sure. It will be mine in a couple of months.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson  More info | Jun 09, 2017 09:10 | #11 wow that is big Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 09, 2017 11:03 | #12 while it's bigger, it's only 175g more for 1 stop of light through the entire range. I think that's bearable and worth it. I'll certainly upgrade to the 2.8 when sony's version comes out, and I'll have to pay the sony premium on top of that Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 09, 2017 14:38 | #13 its a monster but It replaces two lenses: 16-35L f4 IS and 14L II and gives me more flexibility for shooting milkway. previously I was using 14mm and the wide end on my 24-70L II and I've always felt I wanted something in between. also, since the 14 couldn't take filters it was not used as often as I would have liked. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson More info | Jun 09, 2017 15:23 | #14 Im probably going to add the 16-35 F4. I think I can get away with it with the new sensors. Especially for weddings. I have zero issues with F4. 12800 is very clean on the 1Dx2 Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader THREAD STARTER "I am not the final word" More info Post edited over 6 years ago by ed rader. (2 edits in all) | it's an awesome lens. the only reason to get the III is the extra stop and I do love IS on my WA for handheld landscapes but like you said i'm much more confident these days shooting at higher ISOs. in fact setting your camera to auto ISO and minimum shutter speed to say 1/125s is like having IS, imo. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1523 guests, 132 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
