OoDee wrote in post #18612432
I agree with you on the idea that Fuji is just more fun to shoot. I've thought about getting rid of Sony and going all fuji for many times. But so far I've always landed on the conclusion that I just can't. Fact is, I shoot Fuji (X100F) most of the time for personal work. And I'm pretty sure a proper Fuji X-lineup could serve me very well for most of my paid gigs (almost all weddings) too. But then again, there was only one reason I ever bought my A7rii. And that reason was dynamic range, which Fuji's X-line still just can't match that.
So all of this has me thinking about GFX for many many months already. Plus I've always wanted a medium format...
idsurfer wrote in post #18612512
I really like the Sony files, but if I have to be honest...the a6500 is just a chore to shoot with. I was just having this thought this past weekend. It's just no fun at all for one main reason...lack of joystick just make it too cumbersome to quickly select AF point when shooting in a fast environment (think people). It's simply a PIA. Add to that the lack of a tilt screen in portrait orientation making low angle portraits a drag to shoot and the a6500 just sucks to use. There....I said it!

Alas, I'm stuck with it. Too many other things in my life preventing my from re-onvesting into another system.

What I'll prolly do is take the hit on the a6500 and jump on the next version if/when it comes out.
Believe me guys , not an easy choice ,, i only have two lense for the 7r3 (28f2 and 85gm) but might as well only be one , the 85 GM is an awesome lens.
combine it with the sensor of the 7r3 , 

There are two parts to this hobby of mine , the Photographing part and the editing .
I enjoy both in different ways of course
but i find both to be therapeutic
in any case, i love editing the 7r3's Raw files , combined withthe 85 gm.. some times i'll shoot the sony for a few days and edit .. and then use the fuji , and yes there is undeniably a difference in the rawe files between fuji and 7r3. and i dont mean in the 24mp vs 42.
the 7r3 has quicker more responsive AF in my experience. but most of my photography doesnt require blazing fast AF.
not an easy decision.. but at used prices, thats atleast $3500 sitting on a shelf that i'm only using when i want a specific look.(the look the 7r3 and 85gm give)
dont get me wrong i know the 7r3 can be more than that , but because i enjoy shooting the fuji more , i find myself currently more willing to spend on fuji glass than i am on sony.. and so for me the 7r3 is a one trick pony(although i certainly admit it is a very NICE trick)
The fuji has it flaws, but user experience just makes me want to shoot more .
and the raw files arent so bad, i would say only a hair behind the a6500 (with regards to highlight and shadow recomvery) and thats purely in pixel peeping mode
and yes OoDee, the gfx is part of the plan for me .. from what i understand there is another medium format coming soon , rangefinder type (like the xpro2) which is supposed to be about a third cheaper..(i'll have to assume it will have less features)