MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #18678209
Vinz you know I know nothing of shooting people or weddings but I shot a nebula once uncompressed, we had close to 40 light subs and 10 darks. When I threw those files
into DeepSkyStacker it choked. Luckily I had jpgs on the other card for a good outcome. Uncompressed has its place but I don't know where that might be for me. Surely
product photography?
I'm thinking same with Pixel Shift. Great concept but only Olympus can do it (as far as I know) in camera where for say a bug in the field it might matter. My personal physician, who
bought my a99ii shoots uncompressed for everything. I asked him why and he said for printing large images. I've only printed 9 images in the last 5 years so that doesn't help me either.
When using Pixel Shift in the Sony a7rIII, it takes all four shifted images as uncompressed raw files. I think that helps prevent Moiré and other artifacts. Of course, no movement allowed between those 4 exposures.
I've found that for the resolution I shoot, or at least crop to, compressed raw image quality is more than adequate for me.