Talley wrote in post #18686034
I love me some gear talk but I'm pretty much out of g.a.s. right now. My mind has drifted and I'm fixing to sign up for pilot school. I feel long term my photography and aviation hobbies can co-exist if I buy a plane, have a license and fly places for weekend visits. Unfortunately the aviation hobby is a much more expensive hobby than photography lol. Either way lets prime my brain for gear talk:
Now here my thing... the 85 1.8 FE is really a damn nice lens. Sure it's bokeh/rendering is a bit on the rough side wide open and the GM/A both crush it's abilities for smoothness but it's a great lens for the price, perfectly balanced, built well, etc. Love that lens. So for me I'm having a hard time with a few things. First lets get into my now gear collection:
A7riii & A7iii -> adding an A9 shortly
35 2.8 Samyang - Keeper... perfect when you want a minimal setup, great for video
50 1.8 FE this needs to go... not happy with it but want the 55 1.8
85 1.8 FE -Keeper
85 1.4 GM - greatness but my copy is a tad eh wide open but awesome from 1.6 up
70-200 2.8 GM - underwhelmed, not to my standards... going to sell/trade for 100-400
28-75 2.8 Tamron - awesome lens guys... completely makes me happy
5D4 - going to sell
16-35 F4 IS - going to sell
16-35 2.8 iii - going to sell
35A - love lens but i dunno debating what to do with it
85A - love... but see below
200 F2 IS - Sold before and rebought the exact lens from the guy who bought it from me so never selling again period... (ok i might)
50A - too heavy ready to sell
12mm 2.8 fisheye - never going to sell... don't use much but love it too much to get rid of it. love it when I do use it
SO I have been adapting... and I will always need to adapt for the 200F2. That just not going to give up not yet at least. My problem is with any 85 1.4 either the Art of the GM is the fact that I own the 85 1.8 FE and there just isn't too much difference to really justify the much more expensive 1.4 AND the 1.8. The 1.8 seriously makes me happy enough........ BUT. The 200/2 is not a travel lens and I was thinking since I love the 85 1.8.... sell the 1.4's... .that pays for the 105 1.4 which ya it's bigger and heavy and it's going to be funky to use but it's much more travelable than a 200/2. So that is my current debate.
The other debate for me is the 16-35 2.8 iii. Awesome lens.... I don't need the GM. Adapted works out great and it's my lens and why ditch it... but I like the F4 for travel. Perhaps I buy the 12-24 F4 FE for a lighter travel option but keep the canon iii because it just works. You have all the options except for tracking full speed and AF zone/expansion. Well who cares... I'm either in manual mode or just shooting RE or landscape type stuff.
I'll probably keep the canon 2.8 iii
We'll see. I've had some really good images with all the lenses I've owned over time. In the end it's just a lens. I want to enjoy photography but I also really enjoy high performing lenses.