Talley wrote in post #18699275
So this Canon EOS R body as it turns out only does 5fps in servo mode.
Canon jumped into ML (this time, again) stronger than last time (M5) but landed 2-3 gens behind Sony.
That said I revere my 400DOii enough I could dedicate a body just for it--but a couple of EOS ML gens down the road. In those same years Sony might give up a 400 I can heft. In the meantime I'm sipping the Nikon Koolaid with their PF lense and maybe be lenses (currently studying the 300PF too).
By then Nikon's lackluster stab at it will have improved too I'd hope but the new rule in my house is no more adapters. No need to really, the MC-11 on the DOii and a9 is freaky good now.
Still rumors on the Sony 200-500, maybe at Photokina, maybe before. It would have to be truly amazing to beat what I've gotten via the 100400GM even with 2.0TC.
I even doubt the a7000 will break with the rangefinder style.
What I'm gassing for more than anything else is an a9 with a crop sensor.
Is that too much to ask?
I'm doing the D500+500/300PF as a plan B really, getting a crop body that isn't
a6300 or a6500 like, if a true mini-a9 is issued I'd drop the Nikon experiment like
a rock.