thanks fellas for your feedback. I wanted to make sure I won't be kicking myself in the future for not getting the 135 instead 
If I had neither I’d start with 85GM. OTOH, you don’t need both a 55 and a 85 for portraits. Maybe sell me your 55mm LOCA machine for $55 to help go towards your awesome new 85GM.

One more thing: I respect Carlo’s assessment as true that the 85GM is a better portrait lens than 135GM with regards to rendering.
LOL I'll throw in some extras too ok?? :P yes the 55 1.8 is really good. Ive always liked the 50mm and is the one to have with either of the brands I went with. After using the 85mm I remember this was the range I loved when I first started photography on a crop. When I switched over to FF I didn't think about the crop factor and continue to use the 50mm. because it was the cheaper prime too :P
If it was me I would get the 85 and use the 70-200 on the long end at 2.8 in lieu of the 135mm.
thanks. I plan to. I like the cropped background separation on the longer focal length
My personal opinion is that if you are looking specifically for a dedicated portrait lens then the 85 GM is the way to go, I love the way it renders however if you are looking for a more generalist type lens that is good for portraits as well as short tele sports work then the 135 is a better bet, they really are two very different lenses.
I will indeed be using it mainly for portraits as well for events. So it's settled, the 85mm it is. just waiting for the tax return check that should arrive in a week or two 






