MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #18864187
Haha you're pulling my leg and I know it!
Honestly if have any valuable input it might (emphasize might) be with longer lenses but I'm at the point
where I've decided that the 100-400 will do 95% of everything I'd ever want to shoot and that all the other
efforts are just vainful.
Truthfully with the latest crop of FE lenses can we ask for anything more? and your latest 100mm, another shimmering
gem to use. At this point if I could have anything right now it'd be the Tam 17-28 just to save a touch of weight for trips.
Not pulling your leg at all. I’m really appreciative of your thoughts since you own both lenses...I think you’re the only one here that does.
The 100-400...Yesterday I spent time in the Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge specifically for the purpose of contemplating adding the 100-400. It’s entirely within my consideration to return the 100GM and go with a 100-400mm instead. It really comes down to a value judgment.
mystik610 wrote in post #18864205
I've gotten a 12-24 loaner from Sony 3 times now. It's not an optical world beater, but I really love that lens. Too many good choices for Sony on the UWA side of things...confuses the hell out of me.
I want to Loxia 21, 24GM, 16-35GM, 12-24, and perhaps the Tamron UWA zoom coming. I'm not even an UWA guy!
Sony’s announcement of the FE 12-24 G, FE 16-35 GM, and FE 100-400 GM will probably go down as the most painful product announcement I’ll ever experience because all three are so damn good and I want - but cannot have - them all. Happily the FE 12-24mm is exceeding all my expectations and I may now be willing to let go my CV 12mm.