Thanks and thanks! Wherever I live it will be my goal to make my region look appealing. My biggest frustration with my new Georgia home is that, apart from lakes and streams, it's very difficult to get landscape photos of open spaces like y'all have out west, or like I had back in KC. This region is pretty densely forested.
The whole thing has got me in a dilemma that I haven't been able to put to rest: To gain more views I would love to gain some mobility on the water. A "fishing" kayak would be great for maximum stability and comfort. It would open up a lot more landscape vantage points than I currently have near my home. But that would come at high cost - would cost me at least my Batis 135mm. It's not just the cost of the boat, but for the Thule or Yakima rack and rollers for my Prius as well as I'd need to build a shed to house it. Would it be worth it? I'm wrestling hard on it.
The other thought - as Gene suggested the other day - maybe I should grab a FE 100-400mm GM to gain yet more reach. It wouldn't get me more locations, but it could provide even more compositions as well as the occasional bird, snake, beaver, etc. I'm not a fan of the big telephotos for most of my areas of photography interest, but for outings on the lake it might be very useful.
I think it depends on if you would like kayaking in general or only for photography. The costs can add up as you've mentioned. There are also used options on Craigslist if you do some research. I use a native ultimate, which I got used for $700. My paddle was $400, but it's a high end werner and I got it as a long term investment because I enjoy kayaking. You can get a good paddle for less than $200, but don't be too stingy.
There really is something about being on eye level with wildlife or exploring difficult to reach areas by kayak though. Exploring the Everglades by water and not seeing a single person in a whole day, or paddling down a river at sunrise with the mist on the water, always bring a smile to my face.





