Sony Lounge Thread MKIII (All Sony cameras welcome)

Nothing that great but shows what the ar4 mps Gives crop and full frame 1/2500 f6.3 iso 1600 200/600
PP work done and run through Topaz
Rob.

Timphoto wrote in post #18985545
I can't speak to the original A7, but on the A7R2, R3, and R4, my go to adapter has been the Sigma MC-11. I also have a Metabones IV, but the MC-11 is 1/2 the cost of the MB and in most of my use, the MC-11 works just fine.

Klystron wrote in post #18985564
I would say a Sigma MC-11. But if your using manual focus or dont care about quick AF then get a cheap Ebay version. I use one with a couple of manual focus lenses.

Bill in Texas wrote in post #18985573
I used the MC-11 on the original a7 with a Tamron 150-600 and it did ok.

Thanks guys

Sony 70-200/4 is about £850 upwards used.

Canon 70-200/4 is about £330 + adapter
MC-11 is about £185 new so that's up to £520

^^^ Both about the same weight with adapter, Canon will be bigger (because of adapter only) Canon is 67mm filters (72mm Sony)

I think the Tamron is priced around £1000 supposedly...... But then it's FE mount, f/2.8, hopefully 67mm filters.... Looks like I could be letting the 85mm go.....

tim1970 wrote in post #18985581
Sony is also pretty good at sports...

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2i9y​E3T Sony-506 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2i9y​E8T Sony-505 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2i9y​Eds Sony-503 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2i9z​KEP Sony-502 by Tim Richardson, on Flickr

That gym lighting is almost as bad as ours.

Ben DDS wrote in post #18985240
Got to do a little testing with the 105. These are pretty quick edits, but I am thrilled with what this lens is producing so far. All of these were at 1.4

IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …49320169822/in/​datetaken/
DSC07352 by Benjamin Hunt on Flickr

IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …49319473593/in/​datetaken/
DSC07301 by Benjamin Hunt on Flickr

IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …49320008561/in/​datetaken/
DSC07399 by Benjamin Hunt on Flickr

IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …49320165282/in/​datetaken/
DSC07455 by Benjamin Hunt on Flickr

really nice. I have one but have never been used a lot yet.

Who wants an F2.8 fisheye lens for $215?

https://www.dpreview.c​om …mRFJeJp19bnvABe​jWxylvjcII

vinmunoz wrote in post #18985635
Who wants an F2.8 fisheye lens for $215?

https://www.dpreview.c​om …mRFJeJp19bnvABe​jWxylvjcII

I was ready to buy, but need to pay with PayPal.......

GyRob wrote in post #18985595
Nothing that great but shows what the ar4 mps Gives crop and full frame 1/2500 f6.3 iso 1600 200/600
PP work done and run through Topaz
Rob.

Hosted photo: posted by GyRob in
./showthread.php?p=189​85595&i=i35428941
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

Hosted photo: posted by GyRob in
./showthread.php?p=189​85595&i=i188619087
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

Amazing crop!

And my kitchen experiments continue

Photo from itsallart's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (1018823)

Photo from itsallart's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (1018826)

LeeRatters wrote in post #18985605
Thanks guys

Sony 70-200/4 is about £850 upwards used.

Canon 70-200/4 is about £330 + adapter
MC-11 is about £185 new so that's up to £520

^^^ Both about the same weight with adapter, Canon will be bigger (because of adapter only) Canon is 67mm filters (72mm Sony)

I think the Tamron is priced around £1000 supposedly...... But then it's FE mount, f/2.8, hopefully 67mm filters.... Looks like I could be letting the 85mm go.....

Lee you're thinking through it with the + and - of each direction.
Wonder what the E70-350G is in your neck of the woods.
Of course you'd have to NOT be a FF snob!
I couldn't stomach the US prices of it so went the Canadian route and saved over $250.
Given your choices though I'd lean to the FE 70-200 for the AF speed over the adapted lenses, yet
the MC-11 is phenomenal. I haven't see my Metabones in so long...covered in dust.

vinmunoz wrote in post #18985635
Who wants an F2.8 fisheye lens for $215?

https://www.dpreview.c​om …mRFJeJp19bnvABe​jWxylvjcII

MFD 6.7 inches. Hmmmm.
Isn't this the type lens set it to something and everything is in focus?

itsallart wrote in post #18985642
And my kitchen experiments continue

Gallery photo (hosted):
posted by itsallart originally in forum: Member Activities

Gallery photo (hosted):
posted by itsallart originally in forum: Member Activities

Really nice work. Love the soap bubble.

So dark and rainy here...but it could be snow and ice....thinking about it I'd prefer the snow and ice since
it is my off week.

Well speaking of dark. Me in the blind and using a rifle rest for the shutter speed. Using the E70-350G on this
created boreal forest.

LeeRatters wrote in post #18985605
Thanks guys

Sony 70-200/4 is about £850 upwards used.

Canon 70-200/4 is about £330 + adapter
MC-11 is about £185 new so that's up to £520

^^^ Both about the same weight with adapter, Canon will be bigger (because of adapter only) Canon is 67mm filters (72mm Sony)

I think the Tamron is priced around £1000 supposedly...... But then it's FE mount, f/2.8, hopefully 67mm filters.... Looks like I could be letting the 85mm go.....

What about a A mount 70-200 and a converter LA-EA3

MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #18985644
Lee you're thinking through it with the + and - of each direction.
Wonder what the E70-350G is in your neck of the woods.
Of course you'd have to NOT be a FF snob!
I couldn't stomach the US prices of it so went the Canadian route and saved over $250.
Given your choices though I'd lean to the FE 70-200 for the AF speed over the adapted lenses, yet
the MC-11 is phenomenal. I haven't see my Metabones in so long...covered in dust.

A quick search can only find new for about the same price as the FE70-200/4 - That lens would require a new full set of CPL & ND filters though too. I have everything in 67mm at present.

It's just ideas & thoughts at the moment but appreciate all opinions

Klystron wrote in post #18985652
What about a A mount 70-200 and a converter LA-EA3

70-200/2.8?

1340g.....!! No thanks lol

Cheers though.