Miranda1 wrote in post #19048789
Hi Everyone, I have a quick question for the forum.
I have been a long time Aperture user but when Apple stop Aperture support I stopped using it as my DAM software and relied exclusively on managing my image collection within a image master folder on a separate image drive using MAC OS. I picked up a copy of Capture One Pro and I'm in the process of figuring out how I want to manage my image collection, specifically whether I should use referenced files mode or simplify the setup and import the actual RAWs into Capture One database.
The concept of imputing the RAWs directly into the Capture One database appeals to me for it's simplicity it's how I used Aperture but l would still maintain a separate hard drive with all my images stored outside of the database just to be sure.
Reference files are an attractive alternative, it would keep the database significantly smaller but the logistics of moving image files or folder worries me.
If you use Capture One I would appreciate any guidance/tips you could share in respect to which is better and also what your experience has been with the software, I know the raw converter in Capture is fantastic but I'm not sure how the DAM features compare to other asset management applications out there.
What I'm doing is using Sessions, i.e. no import into the system, or reference files. The logistics of moving files aren't so bad, though you may want to move entire folders/projects instead of single files. If you really need to move single files, Capture One has a system whereby you can pack them (with the sidecar files - I do miss the XMPs from ACR) and unpack them losslessly. Gives good performance. Personally I'd rather not have to manage catalogs.