Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Digital Cameras 
Thread started 09 Jun 2017 (Friday) 10:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sony Lounge Thread MKIII (All Sony cameras welcome)

 
Timphoto
Creme de la Curmudgeon
Avatar
11,004 posts
Gallery: 207 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 9571
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Sonoma
Post edited over 6 years ago by Timphoto. (2 edits in all)
     
Sep 20, 2017 11:16 |  #4801

digital_AM wrote in post #18456480 (external link)
Thank you Tim. I'm using Photoshop to stitch the shots. I use Auto Align and then Auto Blend. The key thing in the field is to lock your vertical plane. My FLM ballhead has a dedicated tilt lock knob for this purpose. It prevents the camera from moving side to side as you pan up on a vertical plane. This is kind of a poor man's version of a tilt shift lens. There is a tiny bit of sharpness dropoff when stitching this way but the resulting image still looks great when zoomed in.

I'll have to try that. I have Tilt-Shift lenses, so I may experiment and do a comparison of the sharpness.

navydoc wrote in post #18456521 (external link)
I wonder if my Husky tripod would work for vertical panos? It has tilt using an arm like a video head that doesn't effect panning and a center shaft that raises the camera platform vertically too.

I think the Husky would work just fine. The key is making sure it is level. While I have an RRS ballhead, I've found that my old cheap metal tripod with a pan-tilt video head works better with my tilt-shift lens when shooting pano's. My cheap tripod doesn't have a center shaft, but it might be interesting to experiment with moving the shaft on a vertical pano. I suppose one could consider moving the vertical tripod shaft up and down as a "poor man's nodal rail." :-D



Tim


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vinmunoz
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
17,435 posts
Gallery: 444 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 10276
Joined Sep 2010
Location: California
     
Sep 20, 2017 11:22 |  #4802

Created a quick review of the Affinity Photo shadow recovery vs Camera raw.


| SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
INSTAGRAM (external link)- WEBSITE (external link) - FACEBOOK (external link) - 500PX (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alfredomora
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,976 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19678
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Denver
     
Sep 20, 2017 11:24 |  #4803

navydoc wrote in post #18456521 (external link)
I wonder if my Husky tripod would work for vertical panos? It has tilt using an arm like a video head that doesn't effect panning and a center shaft that raises the camera platform vertically too.

Gene, that should work. Just make sure to level out the tripod.

Timphoto wrote in post #18456543 (external link)
I'll have to try that. I have Tilt-Shift lenses, so I may experiment and do a comparison of the sharpness.


I think the Husky would work just fine. The key is making sure it is level. While I have an RRS ballhead, I've found that my old cheap metal tripod with a pan-tilt video head works better with my tilt-shift lens when shooting pano's. My cheap tripod doesn't have a center shaft, but it might be interesting to experiment with moving the shaft on a vertical pano. I suppose one could consider moving the vertical tripod shaft up and down as a "poor man's nodal rail." :-D

This vertical merging method is better than shooting up and then doing major keystone corrections in post. Looking forward to your test results.


- Alfredo -
Sony a7RII | Voightlander 12 f5.6 | Sony 16-35 GM f2.8 | Zeiss Batis 18 f2.8 | Zeiss Loxia 21 f2.8 | FE 55 f1.8 | Zeiss Loxia 85 f2.4 | Sony 100-400 GM |
Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gregr2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,468 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 202
Joined Apr 2010
Location: West Melbourne, Fl
     
Sep 20, 2017 11:31 |  #4804

vinmunoz wrote in post #18456547 (external link)
Created a quick review of the Affinity Photo shadow recovery vs Camera raw.

Good demo Vinz, have you contacted Affinity directly?


Flickr (external link)
Sony A6500

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alfredomora
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,976 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19678
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Denver
     
Sep 20, 2017 11:35 |  #4805

Is anyone going to try out Aurora HDR 2018 for Windows? I think I'm set as far as plugins are concerned. Frankly I probably have too many.

Also, Nick Page has a luminosity masking video tutorial available. He uses Lumenzia primarily but the concepts can be applied to other luminosity mask panels.

http://www.nickpagepho​tography.com/tutorials​/luminositymasks (external link)


- Alfredo -
Sony a7RII | Voightlander 12 f5.6 | Sony 16-35 GM f2.8 | Zeiss Batis 18 f2.8 | Zeiss Loxia 21 f2.8 | FE 55 f1.8 | Zeiss Loxia 85 f2.4 | Sony 100-400 GM |
Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Sep 20, 2017 11:37 |  #4806

Desperate times calls for desperate measures


been looking for a small faster than 2.8 35....


been using the 35 ultron, and it certainly hits the spot, great IQ. Too bad, the TAP adapter goes to crap in low light.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/09/3/LQ_877169.jpg
Image hosted by forum (877169) © Charlie [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alfredomora
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,976 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19678
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Denver
Post edited over 6 years ago by alfredomora.
     
Sep 20, 2017 11:41 |  #4807

Charlie wrote in post #18456563 (external link)
Desperate times calls for desperate measures


been looking for a small faster than 2.8 35....


been using the 35 ultron, and it certainly hits the spot, great IQ. Too bad, the TAP adapter goes to crap in low light.
Hosted photo: posted by Charlie in
./showthread.php?p=184​56563&i=i212981298
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

Charlie, I have been researching that lens since I am returning my Loxia 35 (left corner is soft). Did you get yours new? Are you using a front filter to help correct the corners?


- Alfredo -
Sony a7RII | Voightlander 12 f5.6 | Sony 16-35 GM f2.8 | Zeiss Batis 18 f2.8 | Zeiss Loxia 21 f2.8 | FE 55 f1.8 | Zeiss Loxia 85 f2.4 | Sony 100-400 GM |
Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Sep 20, 2017 11:55 |  #4808

digital_AM wrote in post #18456568 (external link)
Charlie, I have been researching that lens. Did you get yours new? Are you using a front filter to help correct the corners?

yes, got it new from photovillage for 779.

the black version is 100g lighter, but I'm a sucker for the cool looks of the silver lens.

I'm using mine for people shots, not too concerned about FC, but the corners are ok if you are focused on it.

if you're looking for flat plane sharp, it needs to be stopped down.

for people shots, it's sharp wide open wherever you land the focus.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Sep 20, 2017 12:59 |  #4809

I think I'll do some testing with the CV 35 and FE 35. The FE is certainly very sharp wide open, but it doesnt improve too much stopped down. I think the contrast and color of the CV might be better, the bokeh certainly is.

some snapshots with minimal processing, first was stopped down a little, second wide open. For some reason, the exif would write f1.8 at times, dont even know how that's possible, maybe sony firmware figures it out?

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/09/3/LQ_877188.jpg
Image hosted by forum (877188) © Charlie [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/09/3/LQ_877189.jpg
Image hosted by forum (877189) © Charlie [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alfredomora
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,976 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19678
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Denver
     
Sep 20, 2017 13:07 |  #4810

Charlie wrote in post #18456615 (external link)
I think I'll do some testing with the CV 35 and FE 35. The FE is certainly very sharp wide open, but it doesnt improve too much stopped down. I think the contrast and color of the CV might be better, the bokeh certainly is.

some snapshots with minimal processing, first was stopped down a little, second wide open. For some reason, the exif would write f1.8 at times, dont even know how that's possible, maybe sony firmware figures it out?
Hosted photo: posted by Charlie in
./showthread.php?p=184​56615&i=i257097134
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

Hosted photo: posted by Charlie in
./showthread.php?p=184​56615&i=i154674655
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

Very cool. You're getting AF from the TAP adapter? Is it pretty effective in good light?


- Alfredo -
Sony a7RII | Voightlander 12 f5.6 | Sony 16-35 GM f2.8 | Zeiss Batis 18 f2.8 | Zeiss Loxia 21 f2.8 | FE 55 f1.8 | Zeiss Loxia 85 f2.4 | Sony 100-400 GM |
Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vinmunoz
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
17,435 posts
Gallery: 444 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 10276
Joined Sep 2010
Location: California
     
Sep 20, 2017 13:09 |  #4811

gregr2 wrote in post #18456555 (external link)
Good demo Vinz, have you contacted Affinity directly?

i raised it up at their forums. they responded once long time ago and no update.


| SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
INSTAGRAM (external link)- WEBSITE (external link) - FACEBOOK (external link) - 500PX (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Sep 20, 2017 13:19 |  #4812

digital_AM wrote in post #18456619 (external link)
Very cool. You're getting AF from the TAP adapter? Is it pretty effective in good light?

yes, TAP is pretty effective in good light, but in bad, you're limited to center. It's odd because the adapter AF's worse on my A7rii than A7ii. The A7ii has a smaller PDAF area, and all within that, it does well. With the A7rii, once you get to the edges, it simply stops.

I'll do some landscape shots compared to the FE 35, but due to the finnicky FC, you kind of have to play with it a little bit to get sharp edges and center. Based on a bit of play, I think focused on 1/3 of the frame might get me the best combo, when focused on corners, the lens is certainly capable of sharp corners, but across the frame is a different story.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alfredomora
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,976 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19678
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Denver
     
Sep 20, 2017 13:56 |  #4813

Charlie wrote in post #18456626 (external link)
yes, TAP is pretty effective in good light, but in bad, you're limited to center. It's odd because the adapter AF's worse on my A7rii than A7ii. The A7ii has a smaller PDAF area, and all within that, it does well. With the A7rii, once you get to the edges, it simply stops.

I'll do some landscape shots compared to the FE 35, but due to the finnicky FC, you kind of have to play with it a little bit to get sharp edges and center. Based on a bit of play, I think focused on 1/3 of the frame might get me the best combo, when focused on corners, the lens is certainly capable of sharp corners, but across the frame is a different story.

Thanks Charlie. This sounds promising. Once I get my refund from the Loxia 35, I'm going to order the CV 35 and the needed front filter and short adapter. I'm waiting on infinity tests results from Guy over on FM before ultimately pulling the trigger.


- Alfredo -
Sony a7RII | Voightlander 12 f5.6 | Sony 16-35 GM f2.8 | Zeiss Batis 18 f2.8 | Zeiss Loxia 21 f2.8 | FE 55 f1.8 | Zeiss Loxia 85 f2.4 | Sony 100-400 GM |
Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
Post edited over 6 years ago by Charlie.
     
Sep 20, 2017 14:11 |  #4814

digital_AM wrote in post #18456653 (external link)
Thanks Charlie. This sounds promising. Once I get my refund from the Loxia 35, I'm going to order the CV 35 and the needed front filter and short adapter. I'm waiting on infinity tests results from Guy over on FM before ultimately pulling the trigger.

the thing I'de watch for is how and where Guy focuses on. Due to FC, that's a pretty important aspect for landscapes.

my wife has been hounding me, I think she's onto my new lens, or I would have tested against the FE 35 already. Not sure I will go the filter route or not, I'm not even sure how to create one of those. I will be shooting a lot with the lens in coming weeks, and after that, I'll decide whether or not to pursue the front filter trick.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Sep 20, 2017 15:25 |  #4815

So when testing midframe focus, the cv 35 does indeed look very strong.

edges and midframe crops compared to the FE 35

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/09/3/LQ_877210.jpg
Image hosted by forum (877210) © Charlie [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/09/3/LQ_877211.jpg
Image hosted by forum (877211) © Charlie [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,299,464 views & 140,785 likes for this thread, 249 members have posted to it and it is followed by 170 members.
Sony Lounge Thread MKIII (All Sony cameras welcome)
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1624 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.