Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sony Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Cameras 
Thread started 09 Jun 2017 (Friday) 10:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Sony Lounge Thread MKIII (All Sony cameras welcome)

 
TMaG82
Goldmember
Avatar
1,003 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 335
Joined Jun 2008
     
Sep 23, 2017 07:07 |  #4891

Decided for the time being to just dump the gear that I currently have and to put the money towards our upcoming home purchase, I'll get by for the next 6-9 months using a combination of the iPhone X my wife's buying for me as well as the Canon M6 that I bought for her.

I'm very active on the FM B&S with 120+ transactions but before I list them there tomorrow, thought I would see if any of you guys wanted any of the gear that I'm going to post.

35 f/2.8
55 f/1.8
85 f/1.8 (Sony version)

A9 with extra battery and RRS base plate.

Thought I would feel some sadness or remorse but figure that at this point in time it's more important to give my girls a backyard to run around in instead of staying couped up in a small 2 bedroom apartment. Make no mistake, I'll be back in a big way shortly.


Current Gear: Nadda

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
digital_AM
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,434 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 7532
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Texas
     
Sep 23, 2017 08:03 |  #4892

mystik610 wrote in post #18458517 (external link)
Really nice alfredo. Did you use DXO here for perspective distortion?

Thank you Carlo. I really enjoyed your Disney images on your site. Very well done (images and site).

Yep, I used DXO after doing the pano merge. Some images require just a little bit of correction but others like this one needed more. I used the 8 point correction to get the verticals and horizontal lines of the building level. It worked pretty well. I'm using DXO version 2. I'm not sure if version 3 is significantly better to upgrade.


Sony α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 α6000 / ILCE-6000 | Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM | Carl Zeiss Loxia 21mm F2.8 Loxia 85mm F2.4 Batis 18mm F2.8 Distagon T* 35mm f/2 | Voigtlander Heliar Ultra Wide-Angle 12mm f/5.6 | Tokina AT-X 90mm f/2.5 macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,764 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Likes: 8341
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
Sep 23, 2017 08:25 |  #4893

digital_AM wrote in post #18458387 (external link)
Another 2 shot vertical pano edited in high contrast B&W. I have missed editing in black and white.

Loxia 21mm:

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/YYQa​rv  (external link) 20170816-downtown-SATX-vertical-pano-53-Edit-Edit-Edit-2-copy-proc-web-1280px (external link) by Alfredo Mora (external link), on Flickr

I really like the tones and textures in this shot.

The building does seem stretched vertically to me, not having seen it in person. Using the 'Free Transform' tool, would adjusting the height of the image help correct that? Here's a quick edit and I'm curious if this looks a bit more like the actual structure did.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital_AM
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,434 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 7532
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Texas
     
Sep 23, 2017 08:39 |  #4894

navydoc wrote in post #18458565 (external link)
I really like the tones and textures in this shot.

The building does seem stretched vertically to me, not having seen it in person. Using the 'Free Transform' tool, would adjusting the height of the image help correct that? Here's a quick edit and I'm curious if this looks a bit more like the actual structure did.
thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by navydoc in
./showthread.php?p=184​58565&i=i129615644
forum: Sony Cameras

Thank you Gene. It's a tall building. It probably could use a bit of an adjustment for the height but I like it as is. It reminds me of the Flat Iron building in New York.


Sony α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 α6000 / ILCE-6000 | Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM | Carl Zeiss Loxia 21mm F2.8 Loxia 85mm F2.4 Batis 18mm F2.8 Distagon T* 35mm f/2 | Voigtlander Heliar Ultra Wide-Angle 12mm f/5.6 | Tokina AT-X 90mm f/2.5 macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,692 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 6640
Joined Aug 2010
Location: West Point, Georgia
Post edited 9 months ago by David Arbogast.
     
Sep 23, 2017 08:43 |  #4895

navydoc wrote in post #18458565 (external link)
I really like the tones and textures in this shot.

The building does seem stretched vertically to me, not having seen it in person. Using the 'Free Transform' tool, would adjusting the height of the image help correct that? Here's a quick edit and I'm curious if this looks a bit more like the actual structure did.
thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by navydoc in
./showthread.php?p=184​58565&i=i129615644
forum: Sony Cameras

To me that edit looks fat, stretched (horizontally), ill-proportioned, and unrealistic. And I've not seen the building in person.


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony α7R II | CV 12mm, Loxia 21mm, Loxia 35mm, FE 35mm F1.4, Batis 85mm, Batis 135mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,764 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Likes: 8341
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
Sep 23, 2017 08:53 |  #4896

digital_AM wrote in post #18458569 (external link)
Thank you Gene. It's a tall building. It probably could use a bit of an adjustment for the height but I like it as is. It reminds me of the Flat Iron building in New York.

Thanks Alfredo. Do you happen to know what the name of this building is? Just curious.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,692 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 6640
Joined Aug 2010
Location: West Point, Georgia
     
Sep 23, 2017 08:54 |  #4897

digital_AM wrote in post #18458569 (external link)
Thank you Gene. It's a tall building. It probably could use a bit of an adjustment for the height but I like it as is. It reminds me of the Flat Iron building in New York.

It looks great to me too.

I have been considering whether it's better to have perfect verticals in fine-art images like this, or if allowing some slight keystoning (80% correction instead of 100%) might be good to express the building's loftiness. I don't have an answer, but it's something I've been contemplating lately.


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony α7R II | CV 12mm, Loxia 21mm, Loxia 35mm, FE 35mm F1.4, Batis 85mm, Batis 135mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,764 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Likes: 8341
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
Sep 23, 2017 08:55 |  #4898

David Arbogast wrote in post #18458571 (external link)
To me that edit looks fat, stretched (horizontally), ill-proportioned, and unrealistic. And I've not seen the building in person.

I'm sure I overdid the vertical compression.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,764 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Likes: 8341
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
Sep 23, 2017 08:59 |  #4899

David Arbogast wrote in post #18458582 (external link)
It looks great to me too.

I have been considering whether it's better to have perfect verticals in fine-art images like this, or if allowing some slight keystoning (80% correction instead of 100%) might be good to express the building's loftiness. I don't have an answer, but it's something I've been contemplating lately.

I think a bit of keystoning would be appropriate as I think it would give a better sense of height, depending on how close the viewer is to the building. Typically, each floor of a building is considered to be 10' tall so a building with 8 floors would be around 80' tall, give or take a few feet.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,692 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 6640
Joined Aug 2010
Location: West Point, Georgia
Post edited 9 months ago by David Arbogast. (4 edits in all)
     
Sep 23, 2017 09:07 |  #4900

navydoc wrote in post #18458583 (external link)
I'm sure I overdid the vertical compression.

You raised a compelling thought about architectural photography though. Whether it's a stitched pano, or a single uwa capture, the results in an architectural image can sometimes have an unrealistic appearance (referring to my own experience, not Alfredo's image). So, while your edit may be awry, I nonetheless am appreciative of the thought behind your post and want to make an effort to be mindful of it in my own work.


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony α7R II | CV 12mm, Loxia 21mm, Loxia 35mm, FE 35mm F1.4, Batis 85mm, Batis 135mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital_AM
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,434 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 7532
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Texas
Post edited 9 months ago by digital_AM.
     
Sep 23, 2017 09:10 |  #4901

navydoc wrote in post #18458581 (external link)
Thanks Alfredo. Do you happen to know what the name of this building is? Just curious.

Gene, it was the first Alamo National Bank from the early 1900s. It's now office space.

http://blog.mysananton​io.com …ding-alamo-national-bank/ (external link)

"316 E. Commerce St.
Date Built: 1902
Size: Eight stories
Architect: James Wahrenberger

It may read “Commerce Building” on its north-facing tympanum, but San Antonio history buffs know the building as the first Alamo National Bank. According to the National Register of Historic Places archive, the Alamo National Bank received its charter in 1891 but didn’t have a building to call its own until this one in 1902.

In 1913, the widening of Commerce Street began to accommodate more traffic. In 1915, the Alamo National Bank was moved south 16 feet, 7 inches using a jack-and-roll system."


Sony α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 α6000 / ILCE-6000 | Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM | Carl Zeiss Loxia 21mm F2.8 Loxia 85mm F2.4 Batis 18mm F2.8 Distagon T* 35mm f/2 | Voigtlander Heliar Ultra Wide-Angle 12mm f/5.6 | Tokina AT-X 90mm f/2.5 macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital_AM
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,434 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 7532
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Texas
     
Sep 23, 2017 09:17 |  #4902

David Arbogast wrote in post #18458592 (external link)
You raised a compelling thought about architectural photography though. Whether it's a stitched pano, or a single uwa capture, the results in an architectural image can sometimes have an unrealistic appearance (referring to my own experience, not Alfredo's image). So, while your edit may be awry, I nonetheless am appreciative of the thought behind your post and want to make an effort to be mindful of it in my own work.

I agree David. Thank you both for the feedback. When I shoot the missions, I'm mindful not to correct the verticals 100%. It's more realistic and more appropriate for that type of architecture to leave some of the keystoning uncorrected. I think the same can be applied to some of these historic building.


Sony α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 α6000 / ILCE-6000 | Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM | Carl Zeiss Loxia 21mm F2.8 Loxia 85mm F2.4 Batis 18mm F2.8 Distagon T* 35mm f/2 | Voigtlander Heliar Ultra Wide-Angle 12mm f/5.6 | Tokina AT-X 90mm f/2.5 macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,764 posts
Gallery: 74 photos
Likes: 8341
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
Sep 23, 2017 09:35 |  #4903

Thanks for the info on the building. From my perspective, no pun intended, when a photo of a tall building has been corrected to keep the verticals parallel, it appears too wide at the top and unnatural to me because I'm not used to seeing a building like that from ground level. Of course, using a wide angle lens can also distort the width of an object as well, especially near the edges of the frame. It also bothers me a bit when I see indoor shots where furniture, pictures on the wall, etc are stretched too much horizontally too.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital_AM
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,434 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 7532
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Texas
     
Sep 23, 2017 09:47 |  #4904

^ Agree with you Gene. Sometimes the top of the buildings get stretched out while the bottom gets stretched in making everything look wonky.

---------------

This is a working weather monitoring station as well as fire observation tower.

Brasstown Bald, Northern Georgia

Loxia 21mm:

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4513/37264373111_375ef822d6_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/YLVD​Rz  (external link) 20170826-exploring-Atlanta-25-copy-proc-web-1280px (external link) by Alfredo Mora (external link), on Flickr

Sony α7R II / ILCE-7RM2 α6000 / ILCE-6000 | Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm F1.8 ZA FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM | Carl Zeiss Loxia 21mm F2.8 Loxia 85mm F2.4 Batis 18mm F2.8 Distagon T* 35mm f/2 | Voigtlander Heliar Ultra Wide-Angle 12mm f/5.6 | Tokina AT-X 90mm f/2.5 macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DTBaan
"male gigolo"
Avatar
13,618 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 991
Joined Apr 2011
     
Sep 23, 2017 12:08 |  #4905

MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #18458525 (external link)
A bit of a crop, wishing I'd had the 2.0TC on for this one for the facial expression-

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/XKxo​si  (external link) a roll in the dust (external link) by MedicineMan4040 (external link), on Flickr

wow! that shot blew it away

:P




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

831,740 views & 35,071 likes for this thread
Sony Lounge Thread MKIII (All Sony cameras welcome)
FORUMS Sony Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is TinyTots18
815 guests, 348 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.