Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 16 Mar 2006 (Thursday) 15:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Cormorant vs Squacko Heron Dilemma

 
mdr
Goldmember
Avatar
1,167 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
     
Mar 16, 2006 15:42 |  #1

I'm intending to submit one of these three photo's to a competition. I would appreciate it if you could tell me which one you think is best and why, and if possible, how these can be improved with some manioulation.

Great Cormorant

http://www.marcderidde​r.com …allery_id=29&im​age_id=168 (external link)

Squacko Heron Shaking Dry

http://www.marcderidde​r.com …allery_id=26&im​age_id=153 (external link)

Grey Heron

http://www.marcderidde​r.com …allery_id=31&im​age_id=177 (external link)

Or do you prefer any other bird shots on my site http://www.marcderidde​r.com (external link).

Cheers,

Marc.


Marc
Glasgow, Scotland
www.marcderidder.com (external link)
www.deridder.me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Mar 16, 2006 17:11 |  #2

Great Cormorant: Very nice picture. The exposure and the color balance seem to be right on. I like the lighting because it seems to be coming pretty much straight from the left which gives the subject good depth. The background is well blurred and the detail is very good in all of the bird and the rock. My only problem with the overall image is that the composition is too static with him being so centered.

Grey Heron: Again, a very nice picture with a good exposure and color balance. I would say he is slightly overexposed. Not having been there to see him in the flesh, I could be wrong, but his colors seem to be slighted muted by the slight overexposure. The background is nicely blurred and the detail in the bird and the rock is all excellent. The fact that his mouth is open and gives us a flash of red adjacent to the green background and draws the eye directly to that tongue. I also feel that the rock is slightly overexposed. As in the Cormorant, I feel that the composition could be better if he were not so centered.

Squacko Heron: The sun is almost directly above - actually somewhere to the right and slightly behind the bird. The shadows created in the boat are very good and the lighting on the bird is good for a backlighted subject. Excellent exposure and color balance. Most subjects would become silhouettes in this lighting, but there are two factors mitigating here - first the fact that the sun is shining through his feathers and second, the reflected light from the white boat is lighting up his underside. I note the juxtaposition of the frayed anchor rope at top left with the similar ruffled feathers on the bird. The background is not as blurred as on the other two shots, but manages to not intrude.

I have to declare the Squacko Heron the clear winner on the basis of the superior composition, which is excellent. Also, the overall interest in this image is higher. This character is alive and in motion, whereas the others could be stuffed in comparison.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
keithr
Member
Avatar
87 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: South Africa
     
Mar 17, 2006 02:51 |  #3

!st bird is a white breasted commorant, and the other one is a squacco heron.
prefer the shot of the squacco heron .
here is a pic of also a squacco heron.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 1dsm2, Canon 1dm2n, Canon 20D, Canon 350D
Canon 580Ex Canon 430ex
Canon 70-300 is usm, Canon 17-40, Canon 100 macro 2.8, Canon 50 1.4, Canon 70-200 is usm, Canon 100-400 is usm, Canon 300 2.8 Canon 500 F/4, and lots of other useless and not so useless stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Meaty0
Goldmember
Avatar
3,519 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Mar 17, 2006 04:55 |  #4

I'm no expert judge of photos as to their fitness for competition, but I know what I like. That squacco heron just cracked me up. It looks like it's just come fresh from landing on a power line :-D I reckon it's a winner.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dzdale
Member
98 posts
Joined May 2005
     
Mar 17, 2006 05:21 as a reply to  @ Meaty0's post |  #5

I like the squaco better, I like to composition. but all three are nice


There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~Ansel Adams
EOS 5D, EOS 10D, EOS 30,
17-40mm F4 L, 24-70mm F2.8 L, 70-200mm F2.8 L IS
580EX, 420EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,167 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
     
Mar 17, 2006 07:06 |  #6

Many thanks for your responses. Can't disagree with any comments made.

Would it be worthwhile to clone out the sparkle under the squako's beek?


Marc
Glasgow, Scotland
www.marcderidder.com (external link)
www.deridder.me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Mar 17, 2006 11:30 as a reply to  @ mdr's post |  #7

mdr wrote:
Many thanks for your responses. Can't disagree with any comments made.

Would it be worthwhile to clone out the sparkle under the squako's beek?

I asked myself the same question when I was looking at them the first time around. I waffled then and I'm waffling now.

I guess that if it really bothers you and you think that it will hurt the picture, go ahead. However, in general, I don't like to mess with a picture aside from correcting things like dust on the negative (you can see where I'm coming from).


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,167 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
     
Apr 05, 2006 07:18 |  #8

Submitted the squacco heron shaking dry to the annual camera club competition, and guess what, it won!

Only very minor comment the judge had was to sligtly darken the highlights at the left/bottom edge.

Cheers for your help guys.


Marc
Glasgow, Scotland
www.marcderidder.com (external link)
www.deridder.me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Apr 05, 2006 09:12 |  #9

Doesn't surprise me:lol:

BTW, did you or did you not touch up the burble on his beak?


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,167 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
     
Apr 05, 2006 14:07 as a reply to  @ Robert_Lay's post |  #10

I touched it up. Thought it was too distracting.


Marc
Glasgow, Scotland
www.marcderidder.com (external link)
www.deridder.me (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,524 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Cormorant vs Squacko Heron Dilemma
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1581 guests, 115 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.