Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 23 Jun 2017 (Friday) 20:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

GOOD filter setup for 16-35 F4 IS for landscapes/cityscapes

 
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
Post edited over 6 years ago by Talley.
     
Jun 23, 2017 20:54 |  #1

Planning on some vacationing and will be taking the 16-35 F4 IS to do some cityscapes and landscapes. I'll be at the beach and want to get smooth flowing water on sunrises/sunsets. Anyone recommend some filters for me to use?

Oh... budget. ~100-150 max?


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited over 6 years ago by MalVeauX.
     
Jun 23, 2017 21:05 |  #2

Well, a smooth flow at the beach is at about 0.3s shutter speed.

You can do that without a filter.

But, if you want to stop some light, a 6 stop or 10 stop Haida is cheap and just as good quality as anything top branded. Well within budget.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
4,568 posts
Likes: 879
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Post edited over 6 years ago by davesrose.
     
Jun 23, 2017 21:17 |  #3

What kind of filter are you looking for? Myself, I'm mainly just a circular polarizing filter person. I got a deal with my 70-200mm that included a B&W ND filter and CPL...IMO B&W and Hoya HD filters are good. These days, though, I just use CPLs when I'm shooting some landscapes....most of the time bare and post processed are best. 5D4 getting slower water fall in sunset, you should be OK with intended shutter speed: I took photos with the 5Dc and 70-200mm 2.8 non IS on the beach and it was rather good.


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
THREAD ­ STARTER
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jun 23, 2017 21:20 |  #4

Thought the gradients was needed for the balance of light of the sunrise or sunset


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
4,568 posts
Likes: 879
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Jun 23, 2017 21:26 as a reply to  @ Talley's post |  #5

Do you want to get a good ND gradient filter holder setup though :p That's my main reason for not investing in such a setup. Also the problem of it being a linear gradient, and what if you have a picture with something that isn't linear? No, I'll stick with post processing for those situations...


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
THREAD ­ STARTER
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jun 23, 2017 22:15 |  #6

Well I'll get a CPL to knock out a stop of light and go with it. I'm not use to stopping down but need to explore outside of my realms.

I've never done sunrise/sunsets in any consistent form. This is my only real landscape attempt at sunrise.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/08/1/LQ_807146.jpg
Photo from Talley's gallery.
Image hosted by forum (807146)

A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
4,568 posts
Likes: 879
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Jun 23, 2017 22:30 as a reply to  @ Talley's post |  #7

With my 5Dc I was still able to get some good sunsets. Your example does look underexposed: even with earlier 5Ds, you can get some good highlight recovery. Now with the 5D4, you have even more play with the shadow recovery. CPL can knock down some exposure, but it's more for getting a good saturation in the sky.


Canon 5D mk IV
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited over 6 years ago by MalVeauX.
     
Jun 24, 2017 06:21 |  #8

Talley wrote in post #18385574 (external link)
Thought the gradients was needed for the balance of light of the sunrise or sunset

Maybe you're thinking of a reverse graduated ND filter? For $100, getting a good one of those, and a filter holder, probably isn't going to happen.

You can get a good high stop power circular ND though, if you really feel like blurring the water.

Otherwise, you use the dynamic range of your sensor and expose the sun, and lift shadows on the water/beach.
Or you take more than one exposure, and blend.

I used to used plate filters and all that.
But it's so cumbersome, glare and reflection issues at some angles.
The cost for what it is just isn't worth it to me beyond a normal good quality thread on circular ND filter.

These days, I just take more than one exposure and blend it.

Even my ancient 5D classic can grab enough to work with:

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/2/1481/25980770493_79eb4e0d9b_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/FzQe​UR  (external link) img_a1248_proc_mark (external link) by Martin Wise (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://c1.staticflickr.com/2/1462/26518084341_5e080739de_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/Gpj7​AH  (external link) img_a1233_proc_mark (external link) by Martin Wise (external link), on Flickr

Very best,

My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dochollidayda
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 2077
Joined Aug 2012
     
Jun 25, 2017 12:25 |  #9

MalVeauX wrote in post #18385741 (external link)
Maybe you're thinking of a reverse graduated ND filter? For $100, getting a good one of those, and a filter holder, probably isn't going to happen.

You can get a good high stop power circular ND though, if you really feel like blurring the water.

Otherwise, you use the dynamic range of your sensor and expose the sun, and lift shadows on the water/beach.
Or you take more than one exposure, and blend.

I used to used plate filters and all that.
But it's so cumbersome, glare and reflection issues at some angles.
The cost for what it is just isn't worth it to me beyond a normal good quality thread on circular ND filter.

These days, I just take more than one exposure and blend it.

Even my ancient 5D classic can grab enough to work with:

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/FzQe​UR  (external link) img_a1248_proc_mark (external link) by Martin Wise (external link), on Flickr

QUOTED IMAGE
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/Gpj7​AH  (external link) img_a1233_proc_mark (external link) by Martin Wise (external link), on Flickr

Very best,

Very good advice and I share the same opinion.


flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
Post edited over 6 years ago by ed rader. (2 edits in all)
     
Jun 27, 2017 01:25 |  #10

6-stop ND. check out Ice brand on amazon/ebay. I use Ice big and little stoppers instead of Lee in a Lee filter holder. cost half as much. no color cast. sharp. Ice also makes screw ons that are way less expensive than top brands. if you want to use grads all I use is a 3-stop lee, but that requires ring and holder and is out of your stated budget.


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Jun 27, 2017 01:38 |  #11

for general landscapes with water, i'd rather have a circular polarizer than a grad ND filter...i bought a grad ND, but never use it...i prefer bracketing and blending the exposures personally

it sounds like you're going to be traveling, i'd say make sure you've got a travel tripod more than anything


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
THREAD ­ STARTER
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jun 27, 2017 06:17 |  #12

ed rader wrote in post #18387892 (external link)
6-stop ND. check out Ice brand on amazon/ebay. I use Ice big and little stoppers instead of Lee in a Lee filter holder. cost half as much. no color cast. sharp. Ice also makes screw ons that are way less expensive than top brands. if you want to use grads all I use is a 3-stop lee, but that requires ring and holder and is out of your stated budget.

Maybe I need to increase my budget

DreDaze wrote in post #18387898 (external link)
for general landscapes with water, i'd rather have a circular polarizer than a grad ND filter...i bought a grad ND, but never use it...i prefer bracketing and blending the exposures personally

it sounds like you're going to be traveling, i'd say make sure you've got a travel tripod more than anything

Will look into the circular. I have small and large tripods. Large is the Sirui 5241xl and the small is the Sirui 1205x w/ K-10x ballhead. Folds to 14" w/ head and is 2.3lbs total. While it's no super massive strong tripod it handles perfectly fine w/ the 5D4 and lenses up to 2lbs. The 15-30 tamron worked well on it but I prefer to use it w/ the 16-35 F4 IS. It can handle pretty decent winds too. So ya the tripod thing is covered.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
Post edited over 6 years ago by Charlie. (2 edits in all)
     
Jun 27, 2017 10:05 |  #13

option 1: avoid filters by shooting during the burn, like 15 minutes after sunset, best time to shoot IMO

option 2: look into a LEE style filter setup with 100x100mm filters. I personally ditched "LEE" brand and experimenting "Bombo" holders, very inexpensive, although, my personal setup is even more expensive than LEE since it works on the CV10. Regular adapter ring goes for only $7. Worth exploring if you have multiple lenses and very fast in the field, sunsets dont last very long!

option 3: Circular filter of your largest lens with adapter rings for smaller stuff. 82mm filter + 77 to 82 adapter

golden hour, 3-6 stop gives you best water texture IMO, the wider the lens generally longer exposure time you'll want (1/4-2s)

6 stop probably my favorite for that type of shooting, just enough, not overkill. 3 stop can work too, 10, way overkill.... that said, 3,6, 10 are my core filters. I have a square CPL, but dont use too often. I dont use grads, just bracketing. You'll have to find a good exposure for the water flow, then grab a few brackets for the sky. You eventually get better at post processing and it becomes second nature.

LEE brand filters this day and age.... overpriced. you get what you pay for does not apply, in fact my LEE's have performed worse than some of my generic stuff!

haida makes the best 10 stopper, but a tossup now with cheapo ICE filters*

*older ICE filters were really bad or possibly fakes, so buy with a good return policy, 10 stoppers are the most tricky due to high density

zomei/ice have good 3/6 stop filters, generally very reliable, and made from glass (LEE plastic too easy to scratch).

I do have a complete set of 82mm filters that I've been thinking of selling. A combination of the filters that give the cleanest results for smallest price. The CPL costs more than all the filters combined :-P

attached is my newish filter system by bombo, which has various adapters from inexpensive to very expensive. The ultra small size has made a difference for me, I can fit in my photo vest just barely, couldnt do that with the LEE.

I forget the option 4: if you have a fairly burly tripod, you can simply hold the square filter on the lens itself and take a shot. not the best option, but I've done it before. I think I lost an adapter ring in the sand, somehow fell off the lens

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/06/4/LQ_862236.jpg
Image hosted by forum (862236) © Charlie [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
Post edited over 6 years ago by ed rader. (2 edits in all)
     
Jun 27, 2017 11:32 as a reply to  @ Talley's post |  #14

if you want cheaper lee bits check out The Filter Dude. for example, his wide angle rings are as good as Lee but half the price. haven't used his filter holder but I've heard it's as good. for ND grads i'd stick with Lee tho. also, forget reverse grads. I hold the sky back and work the lower half of an image in LR by reversing the ND grad too. you have more DR now with 5d4.


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
Post edited over 6 years ago by ed rader. (2 edits in all)
     
Jun 27, 2017 11:38 as a reply to  @ Charlie's post |  #15

I shoot before the burn and after. sometimes there is no burn or the best shots occur before the burn. I had to clean up a little flare in this shot but I push my my equipment. I used a 3-stop grad here to hold back the sky.

IMAGE: http://erader.zenfolio.com/img/s7/v157/p2387174498-4.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://erader.zenfolio​.com/img/s7/v157/p2387​174498-4.jpg  (external link) on zenfolio

http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

14,940 views & 8 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
GOOD filter setup for 16-35 F4 IS for landscapes/cityscapes
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1496 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.