Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 29 Jun 2017 (Thursday) 09:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Quick question about resolution

 
rjharris
Goldmember
Avatar
1,227 posts
Gallery: 73 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1326
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Near Dallas
     
Jun 29, 2017 09:22 |  #1

I normally don't do weddings so this might be a dumb question but thought i would ask anyways. I shot my brothers wedding for him last weekend with my 5D IV set to full resolution and around 800 images or so. Lightroom CC was slow to say the least. I did a little bit of research on the net and some of the videos or pages I was researching were saying that they shot in Small Raw on a 5D II (I believe it was SLR Lounge but I could be wrong).

Anyways, are you wedding photographers shooting in full sized raw with your cameras? I'm just curious as to what the pros are doing. I didn't even think to set my camera up to mRAW which would have saved a considerable amount of time editing I bet.

Thanks.

Also, I'm getting ready to switch from HDD to SSD this weekend, will it make much difference.

Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Jun 29, 2017 09:42 |  #2

rjharris wrote in post #18389717 (external link)
Also, I'm getting ready to switch from HDD to SSD this weekend, will it make much difference.

It will speed up the boot process, but I doubt it will make a significant difference for LR. This is based on my own experience moving to an SSD, plus comments made by others in recent threads here on POTN. Your mileage may vary, so do let us know.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qlayer2
OOOHHH! Pretty Moth!
Avatar
941 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 122
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Jun 29, 2017 09:46 |  #3

Take a look at your manual - pg 171.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/06/5/LQ_862487.jpg
Image hosted by forum (862487) © Qlayer2 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Raw: 6,720 × 4,480 pixels (30 MP) native.
mRAW: 5,040 × 3,360 (17 MP).
sRAW: 3,360 × 2,240 (7.5 MP).

I would only use these settings if I needed to transfer raw images via wifi immediately - say for a sports shooter on the sideline, web reporter who only needs low resolution images, etc.

Using these, you are essentially throwing away pixels, which is fine for web based images, small prints, etc. For any portrait or wedding work where printing large and having the ability to crop is important, I'd use the full sized raw images.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjharris
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,227 posts
Gallery: 73 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1326
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Near Dallas
     
Jun 29, 2017 10:42 as a reply to  @ Qlayer2's post |  #4

Thanks. I've read the manual, (or at least parts of it). I was just wondering if most shot in full resolution during a wedding or if they went down a notch since they are taking so many photographs.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
erikfig
Goldmember
Avatar
2,151 posts
Likes: 203
Joined May 2012
Location: Orlando, FL
     
Jun 29, 2017 11:30 |  #5

I don't own a 5D IV but if I did. I would use it on FULL RAW always.


Who cares about my gear?
FlickR (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Amadauss
Senior Member
Avatar
710 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 145
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa
     
Jun 29, 2017 11:44 |  #6

Full raw. Higher the better.


2-R-6, 1-5D Mark 4, 3-5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, 2-7D's, 70D, canon 70-200 2.8 L IS II, 24-70L II, 85 1.8, 85 1.2, 50mm, 135 mm F2 L, 17-40 , 24-105, Sigma 35 Art and 18-35 1.8, 600 EX's, Elinchrom RX and Phottix 500 strobes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjharris
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,227 posts
Gallery: 73 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1326
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Near Dallas
     
Jun 29, 2017 12:03 |  #7

Thanks guys, that was what I was thinking, I had just seen some shooting smaller files but kind of thought that the client would be getting short changed. Like I said, I don't do weddings this was just me shooting my brothers wedding for him.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 6 years ago by Alveric.
     
Jun 29, 2017 12:19 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

Full RAW all the way. AdobeRGB colour space.

LR has become a bit of a resource hog over the years. I noticed it when I ran a beta/demo of version 4. Regardless, I'd look into optimising LR rather than throw away data.

http://www.lightroomze​n.com …om-for-better-performance (external link)

(I don't do weddings either.)


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jun 29, 2017 12:27 |  #9

Setting the largest resolution the camera can muster affords the most latitude in post processing and final output, from noise reduction to cropping needs. You can shoot medium jpg but at least shoot full raw.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil ­ V
Goldmember
1,977 posts
Likes: 75
Joined Jan 2005
Location: S Yorks UK
     
Jul 17, 2017 13:03 |  #10

If you have Lightroom set to create full size previews on import, it will slow down import but speed up working.


Gear List
website: South Yorkshire Wedding photographer in Doncaster (external link)
Twitter (external link)Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjharris
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,227 posts
Gallery: 73 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1326
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Near Dallas
     
Jul 17, 2017 15:45 as a reply to  @ Phil V's post |  #11

I do. Big files just take awhile. Lightroom has never been lightning fast in my opinion.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Silver-Halide
Senior Member
839 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 253
Joined Jan 2015
     
Jul 17, 2017 19:32 |  #12

There's a compression that takes place for MRaw and SRaw. I don't remember if it was posted here or not but you lose dynamic range too, IIRC. I shoot full raw all the way or small JPG if its just a snapshot of an informational sign at a tourist spot ors omething. Just don't forget to switch it back!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
15,505 posts
Gallery: 789 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 51009
Joined May 2008
Location: Ottawa
     
Jul 17, 2017 20:56 |  #13

Silver-Halide wrote in post #18404416 (external link)
There's a compression that takes place for MRaw and SRaw. I don't remember if it was posted here or not but you lose dynamic range too, IIRC. I shoot full raw all the way or small JPG if its just a snapshot of an informational sign at a tourist spot ors omething. Just don't forget to switch it back!

I'm not sure the word compression has meaning for a raw file. All raw files contain "image data exactly as captured on the sensor."

I would never use the smaller RAWs, but I don't think there is any image quality loss, other than resolution, if you do.


Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
I'm Ed. Migrating to cameraderie.org and Talk Photography where I'm Archibald.

I'm probably listening to Davide of MIMIC (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 17, 2017 21:03 |  #14

Archibald wrote in post #18389726 (external link)
It will speed up the boot process, but I doubt it will make a significant difference for LR. This is based on my own experience moving to an SSD, plus comments made by others in recent threads here on POTN. Your mileage may vary, so do let us know.

Agreed: LR is CPU-bound. That includes generating previews and rendering output jpgs. Applying some operations can be sped up with the appropriate GPU, but that didn't work too well when I tried it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 17, 2017 21:05 |  #15

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18389901 (external link)
Setting the largest resolution the camera can muster affords the most latitude in post processing and final output, from noise reduction to cropping needs. You can shoot medium jpg but at least shoot full raw.

Yep. I figure I only get one chance to capture an image so I want all the data possible. Disk space and to some degree CPU power is cheap.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,265 views & 3 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it and it is followed by 8 members.
Quick question about resolution
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1502 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.