Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 29 Jun 2017 (Thursday) 09:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Quick question about resolution

 
rjharris
Senior Member
Avatar
892 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 339
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Near Dallas
     
Jun 29, 2017 09:22 |  #1

I normally don't do weddings so this might be a dumb question but thought i would ask anyways. I shot my brothers wedding for him last weekend with my 5D IV set to full resolution and around 800 images or so. Lightroom CC was slow to say the least. I did a little bit of research on the net and some of the videos or pages I was researching were saying that they shot in Small Raw on a 5D II (I believe it was SLR Lounge but I could be wrong).

Anyways, are you wedding photographers shooting in full sized raw with your cameras? I'm just curious as to what the pros are doing. I didn't even think to set my camera up to mRAW which would have saved a considerable amount of time editing I bet.

Thanks.

Also, I'm getting ready to switch from HDD to SSD this weekend, will it make much difference.

Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
6,672 posts
Gallery: 234 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 7738
Joined May 2008
Location: Calgary
     
Jun 29, 2017 09:42 |  #2

rjharris wrote in post #18389717 (external link)
Also, I'm getting ready to switch from HDD to SSD this weekend, will it make much difference.

It will speed up the boot process, but I doubt it will make a significant difference for LR. This is based on my own experience moving to an SSD, plus comments made by others in recent threads here on POTN. Your mileage may vary, so do let us know.


Pentax Spotmatic F with 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 50/1.8, 135/3.5; Canon digital gear
C&C always welcome.
Picture editing OK
Donate to POTN here

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qlayer2
OOOHHH! Pretty Moth!
Avatar
941 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 119
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Jun 29, 2017 09:46 |  #3

Take a look at your manual - pg 171.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Raw: 6,720 × 4,480 pixels (30 MP) native.
mRAW: 5,040 × 3,360 (17 MP).
sRAW: 3,360 × 2,240 (7.5 MP).

I would only use these settings if I needed to transfer raw images via wifi immediately - say for a sports shooter on the sideline, web reporter who only needs low resolution images, etc.

Using these, you are essentially throwing away pixels, which is fine for web based images, small prints, etc. For any portrait or wedding work where printing large and having the ability to crop is important, I'd use the full sized raw images.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjharris
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
892 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 339
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Near Dallas
     
Jun 29, 2017 10:42 as a reply to  @ Qlayer2's post |  #4

Thanks. I've read the manual, (or at least parts of it). I was just wondering if most shot in full resolution during a wedding or if they went down a notch since they are taking so many photographs.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
erikfig
Goldmember
Avatar
2,147 posts
Likes: 192
Joined May 2012
Location: Orlando, FL
     
Jun 29, 2017 11:30 |  #5

I don't own a 5D IV but if I did. I would use it on FULL RAW always.


Who cares about my gear?
FlickR (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Amadauss
Senior Member
Avatar
647 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 117
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Lehigh Valley Pa
     
Jun 29, 2017 11:44 |  #6

Full raw. Higher the better.


1-1Dx II 1-5D Mark 4, 3-5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, 2-7D's, 70D, canon 70-200 2.8 L IS II, 24-70L II, 85 1.8, 85 1.2, 50mm, 135 mm F2 L, 17-40 , 24-105, Sigma 35 Art and 18-35 1.8, 600 EX's, Elinchrom RX and Phottix 500 strobes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjharris
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
892 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 339
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Near Dallas
     
Jun 29, 2017 12:03 |  #7

Thanks guys, that was what I was thinking, I had just seen some shooting smaller files but kind of thought that the client would be getting short changed. Like I said, I don't do weddings this was just me shooting my brothers wedding for him.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,462 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Likes: 981
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 1 year ago by Alveric.
     
Jun 29, 2017 12:19 |  #8

Full RAW all the way. AdobeRGB colour space.

LR has become a bit of a resource hog over the years. I noticed it when I ran a beta/demo of version 4. Regardless, I'd look into optimising LR rather than throw away data.

http://www.lightroomze​n.com …om-for-better-performance (external link)

(I don't do weddings either.)


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,528 posts
Gallery: 79 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3740
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Jun 29, 2017 12:27 |  #9

Setting the largest resolution the camera can muster affords the most latitude in post processing and final output, from noise reduction to cropping needs. You can shoot medium jpg but at least shoot full raw.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phil ­ V
Goldmember
1,975 posts
Likes: 73
Joined Jan 2005
Location: S Yorks UK
     
Jul 17, 2017 13:03 |  #10

If you have Lightroom set to create full size previews on import, it will slow down import but speed up working.


Gear List
website: South Yorkshire Wedding photographer in Doncaster (external link)
Twitter (external link)Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjharris
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
892 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 339
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Near Dallas
     
Jul 17, 2017 15:45 as a reply to  @ Phil V's post |  #11

I do. Big files just take awhile. Lightroom has never been lightning fast in my opinion.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Silver-Halide
Senior Member
792 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 216
Joined Jan 2015
     
Jul 17, 2017 19:32 |  #12

There's a compression that takes place for MRaw and SRaw. I don't remember if it was posted here or not but you lose dynamic range too, IIRC. I shoot full raw all the way or small JPG if its just a snapshot of an informational sign at a tourist spot ors omething. Just don't forget to switch it back!


Echoes in Eternity LLC | Tucson and Southern Arizona Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Avatar
6,672 posts
Gallery: 234 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 7738
Joined May 2008
Location: Calgary
     
Jul 17, 2017 20:56 |  #13

Silver-Halide wrote in post #18404416 (external link)
There's a compression that takes place for MRaw and SRaw. I don't remember if it was posted here or not but you lose dynamic range too, IIRC. I shoot full raw all the way or small JPG if its just a snapshot of an informational sign at a tourist spot ors omething. Just don't forget to switch it back!

I'm not sure the word compression has meaning for a raw file. All raw files contain "image data exactly as captured on the sensor."

I would never use the smaller RAWs, but I don't think there is any image quality loss, other than resolution, if you do.


Pentax Spotmatic F with 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 50/1.8, 135/3.5; Canon digital gear
C&C always welcome.
Picture editing OK
Donate to POTN here

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,139 posts
Likes: 401
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 17, 2017 21:03 |  #14

Archibald wrote in post #18389726 (external link)
It will speed up the boot process, but I doubt it will make a significant difference for LR. This is based on my own experience moving to an SSD, plus comments made by others in recent threads here on POTN. Your mileage may vary, so do let us know.

Agreed: LR is CPU-bound. That includes generating previews and rendering output jpgs. Applying some operations can be sped up with the appropriate GPU, but that didn't work too well when I tried it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,139 posts
Likes: 401
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 17, 2017 21:05 |  #15

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18389901 (external link)
Setting the largest resolution the camera can muster affords the most latitude in post processing and final output, from noise reduction to cropping needs. You can shoot medium jpg but at least shoot full raw.

Yep. I figure I only get one chance to capture an image so I want all the data possible. Disk space and to some degree CPU power is cheap.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,581 views & 3 likes for this thread
Quick question about resolution
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is prakashman
693 guests, 297 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.