Sep 11, 2017 12:27 | #16 Tamron 24-70 g2 and Tamron 15-30 @24mm Tripod VC off.  Image hosted by forum (875620) © cseybert [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.  Image hosted by forum (875621) © cseybert [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 12, 2017 01:47 | #17 Got mine today and would love to show some images but my laptop went missing on Fri night on a Southwest flight.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2017 18:03 | #18 Dustin Abbot's got his first set of IQ tests up www.matthewbeutelphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2742 Joined Oct 2015 More info | Sep 18, 2017 19:11 | #19  Permanent bancseybert wrote in post #18449416  I did some shots from tripod VC off. Tamron 24-70 g2 @70mm and Tamron 70-200 @70mm. 
 Hosted photo: posted by cseybert in ./showthread.php?p=18449416&i=i106255144 forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Hosted photo: posted by cseybert in ./showthread.php?p=18449416&i=i1777482 forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive Exif for both says Tamron 70-200 G2. That was my first thought, too. The framing seems TOO exact to be different lenses. Please clarify.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Exif does not show up for the new 24-70 g2 yet look at my other post with the 15-30 vc
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2017 21:53 | #21 another from 24-70 g2  Image hosted by forum (876904) © cseybert [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2742 Joined Oct 2015 More info | Sep 18, 2017 21:58 | #22 Permanent bancseybert wrote in post #18455391 another from 24-70 g2 
Hosted photo: posted by cseybert in ./showthread.php?p=18455391&i=i219734028 forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 19, 2017 00:23 | #23 Canon R3 | RP | 7D2+grip | EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II | EF 135mm f/2L | EF 50mm f/1,2L | RF 100mm f/2,8L | Tamron 24-70mm f/2,8 VC G2 | Tamron 17-35mm f/2,8-4 Di OSD | ZE 2/100mm | ZF 2/35mm | ZF 1,4/85mm | ZF 2/135mm | CV 1,4/58mm Nokton | Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2,8D | DC-Nikkor 105mm f/2D | Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cseybert Member More info Post edited over 6 years ago by cseybert. | I will shoot it again to make sure later this afternoon. what distance?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cseybert Member More info Post edited over 6 years ago by cseybert. (2 edits in all) | Sep 19, 2017 10:39 | #25 A couple more from today, sun's not out so different lighting same location different ruler. 24-70 g2 and 70-200 g2 @70mm 2.8 Opposite lens in background.  Image hosted by forum (876980) © cseybert [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.  Image hosted by forum (876981) © cseybert [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2742 Joined Oct 2015 More info | Sep 19, 2017 14:25 | #26 Permanent bancseybert wrote in post #18455746 A couple more from today, sun's not out so different lighting same location different ruler. 24-70 g2 and 70-200 g2 @70mm 2.8 Opposite lens in background. 
Hosted photo: posted by cseybert in ./showthread.php?p=18455746&i=i130504326 forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Hosted photo: posted by cseybert in ./showthread.php?p=18455746&i=i93022247 forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive Thanks for doing this, but I don't get what it is supposed to mean. At least this comparison looks like two different lenses. The first post was very suggestive that the same lens was used for both shots. According to EXIF, that was the case.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
My computer will not show exif for the new lens. Sorry for the mix up.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 19, 2017 15:31 | #28 Does it drain the battery when the camera is off (like the old one ) Majid flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
If you mean the lens the answer would be no, my first version didn't drain the battery either. Hope that helps.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 21, 2017 01:01 | #30 cseybert wrote in post #18456007 If you mean the lens the answer would be no, my first version didn't drain the battery either. Hope that helps. yes I mean the lens thank you , my mk1 does draining the battery , it had a firmware issue with some Canon bodies Majid flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
| x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1496 guests, 139 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
