Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 30 Jun 2017 (Friday) 08:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Tamron SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2

 
Shaun ­ Liddy
Senior Member
286 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 471
Joined Feb 2016
     
Oct 04, 2017 15:05 |  #31

Here are a couple quick shots from this weekend.

Both are shot with a 5D MK3 on a tripod 2 second timer and remote trigger. I did have IS enabled as it was a little bit of a breeze and the factory neck strap is on the camera. I tried to keep the strap tight where the wind did not catch it causing shake.

27mm
30 seconds
F/6.3
ISO 1600

I tried a couple in bulb setting but I am not well educated on my wireless trigger. Not sure f I needed to hold it or press to open then again to press to close. I tried both ways but didn't seem to work well either way. I guess I need to read the book. I would have liked to lower ISO but not loose DOF hence why bulb would have made sense. Also the moving lights would have been different.


At 100% crop, even with the noise seen, it looks pretty darned nice.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/10/1/LQ_879292.jpg
Image hosted by forum (879292) © Shaun Liddy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/10/1/LQ_879293.jpg
Image hosted by forum (879293) © Shaun Liddy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shaun ­ Liddy
Senior Member
286 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 471
Joined Feb 2016
     
Oct 21, 2017 00:30 |  #32

My girls working at the neighbors sheep farm.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/10/3/LQ_881834.jpg
Image hosted by forum (881834) © Shaun Liddy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/10/3/LQ_881835.jpg
Image hosted by forum (881835) © Shaun Liddy [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LoneRider
Goldmember
Avatar
4,050 posts
Gallery: 1013 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 14329
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Marysville, WA.
     
Jan 23, 2018 07:49 as a reply to  @ post 18456928 |  #33

Tamron will fix that if still under warranty, they did for mine that drained my 6D.

Evidently it was only the first run that had the problem... not all G1 lenses and only with certain bodies.


Wayne...
~I don't suffer from gear ADD, I embrace and enjoy it...~
Canon EOS R5, R6, R7, and a bunch of glass...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Crockett
Senior Member
Avatar
288 posts
Likes: 93
Joined May 2017
     
Jan 23, 2018 08:21 |  #34

would love to see some portraits with this lens using canon bodies. looks nice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
supaman
Member
155 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
     
Apr 02, 2018 09:57 |  #35

Some from this weekend. I just got the Camera (5diii) and lens on Friday. I am far from a pro, but have bought and sold quite a few camera/lenses. This is by far my favorite already. The 70-200 g2 Tamron comes tomorrow and can’t wait for it. Critique the pics if you like, as I said, I am far from a pro.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/04/1/LQ_907243.jpg
Image hosted by forum (907243) © supaman [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/04/1/LQ_907244.jpg
Image hosted by forum (907244) © supaman [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

5Diii:Tamron 24-70 f2.8:Tamron 70-200 f2.8 G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
supaman
Member
155 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
     
Apr 02, 2018 10:00 |  #36

Two more.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/04/1/LQ_907246.jpg
Image hosted by forum (907246) © supaman [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/04/1/LQ_907247.jpg
Image hosted by forum (907247) © supaman [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

5Diii:Tamron 24-70 f2.8:Tamron 70-200 f2.8 G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ma11rats
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 445
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Az
     
Apr 02, 2018 21:02 |  #37

supaman wrote in post #18598741 (external link)
Some from this weekend. I just got the Camera (5diii) and lens on Friday. I am far from a pro, but have bought and sold quite a few camera/lenses. This is by far my favorite already. The 70-200 g2 Tamron comes tomorrow and can’t wait for it. Critique the pics if you like, as I said, I am far from a pro.
Hosted photo: posted by supaman in
./showthread.php?p=185​98741&i=i6551922
forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive


Even though they're small kids.....get that shutter speed up! 1/500 at a minimum for that age.


www.matthewbeutelphoto​graphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
supaman
Member
155 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
     
Apr 02, 2018 22:01 |  #38

ma11rats wrote in post #18599158 (external link)
Even though they're small kids.....get that shutter speed up! 1/500 at a minimum for that age.

Thanks for the advice, will try it next time! Note: all of the pics were shot in aperture priority mode set to f2.8 and everything else was auto.


5Diii:Tamron 24-70 f2.8:Tamron 70-200 f2.8 G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D-Noc
Senior Member
Avatar
286 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 451
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Denmark
     
Aug 07, 2018 14:36 |  #39

I bought this extremely heavy lens a couple of months ago. I found it good but not all that. A bit disappointed, I invested in the Tap-In console and that made my lens really rock.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/08/1/LQ_926482.jpg
Image hosted by forum (926482) © D-Noc [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/08/1/LQ_926483.jpg
Image hosted by forum (926483) © D-Noc [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

My Flickr page (external link) | My Photo Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D-Noc
Senior Member
Avatar
286 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 451
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Denmark
     
Aug 07, 2018 14:39 |  #40

A couple more ߙ

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/08/1/LQ_926487.jpg
Image hosted by forum (926487) © D-Noc [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/08/1/LQ_926488.jpg
Image hosted by forum (926488) © D-Noc [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

My Flickr page (external link) | My Photo Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D-Noc
Senior Member
Avatar
286 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 451
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Denmark
     
Aug 19, 2018 04:05 |  #41

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/08/3/LQ_928439.jpg
Image hosted by forum (928439) © D-Noc [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
The rear end of a SU-27 Flanker. This lens is really great and versatile. But sooo much heavier than my 35mm f/2 IS.

My Flickr page (external link) | My Photo Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blairc
Member
41 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
     
Sep 07, 2018 12:06 |  #42

I have a Canon 80D along with Tamron 17-50 2.8 and 70-200 2.8.

I'd like to eventually upgrade the 17-50 with this 24-70. Following that would probably be an upgrade to a full frame body.

I've heard that it would not be good to put this lens on a crop body like my 80D. The reason given was that this is a "full-frame lens" and would result in some vignetting in the images. I've not seen that with the 70-200, so would it happen on the 24-70?

What are your thoughts on this?

Thank you


_______________
Canon 80D, Canon T1i,
Tamron 17-50 f/2.8, Tamron SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC G2,
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF-S 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shaun ­ Liddy
Senior Member
286 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 471
Joined Feb 2016
     
Sep 07, 2018 14:48 |  #43

I have no issues with it on my 7Dmkii. If there is some vignetting on the 7dmkii, it hasn't screamed out to me and I do shoot a 5dmkiii with this lens as well.

This lens is a good preformer on both bodies.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D-Noc
Senior Member
Avatar
286 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 451
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Denmark
     
Sep 10, 2018 11:06 |  #44

blairc wrote in post #18702576 (external link)
I have a Canon 80D along with Tamron 17-50 2.8 and 70-200 2.8.

I'd like to eventually upgrade the 17-50 with this 24-70. Following that would probably be an upgrade to a full frame body.

I've heard that it would not be good to put this lens on a crop body like my 80D. The reason given was that this is a "full-frame lens" and would result in some vignetting in the images. I've not seen that with the 70-200, so would it happen on the 24-70?

What are your thoughts on this?

Thank you

The statement that a full frame lens should cause vignetting on a crop censor seems a bit backwards. The crop censor effectively shows only the centre part of the image projected through the lens, and as vignetting happens at the edges, it would result in less vignetting on a crop body.

You would end up with a lens that might feel a bit long though. 24-70 mm would Translate to somerhing like 38-122 mm on a crop body.

Otter than that the lens is amazing, and should you consider a full frame body at some point you can still use it.


My Flickr page (external link) | My Photo Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LoneRider
Goldmember
Avatar
4,050 posts
Gallery: 1013 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 14329
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Marysville, WA.
Post edited over 5 years ago by LoneRider.
     
Oct 09, 2018 03:29 |  #45

Finally pulled the trigger. I have known for a while I would be replacing my G1 with either the G2 or the Canon 24-70mm L II. Went back and forth a lot, but just couldn’t come across a review that seemed to justify the price difference and lack of IS on Canon.

The only issue I ever had with many G1 was focus speed (and draining the battery on my 6D even with camera off, but Tamron fixed that for me).

Seems that according to everything I have read the G2 has really stepped it up. Should be in my hands on Thursday from Adorama.

A little surprised this thread doesn’t have more photos...


Wayne...
~I don't suffer from gear ADD, I embrace and enjoy it...~
Canon EOS R5, R6, R7, and a bunch of glass...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

24,016 views & 25 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it and it is followed by 22 members.
Tamron SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1496 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.