Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 16 Jul 2017 (Sunday) 10:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Money or usefulness not the issue.

 
fordmondeo
Senior Member
998 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 188
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Portsmouth England
Post edited 11 months ago by fordmondeo.
     
Jul 16, 2017 10:09 |  #1

Which of these two lenses is the outright sexy-est?

200mm f2L or 300mm f2.8L mk2

I don't care about usefulness, weight, focal range, sharpness, price, what my primary uses are or bokeh.
Try and think bragging rights.

Given the choice, what would you choose?


Vaginator9000

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
PineBomb
I have many notable flaws
Avatar
2,470 posts
Gallery: 92 photos
Likes: 1168
Joined Apr 2014
Location: Austin, Texas
     
Jul 16, 2017 10:12 |  #2

If sexiness is the measuring stick then I pick whichever one isn't wearing a coat.


-Matt
Website (external link) | flickr (external link) | instagram (external link) | street portrait project on instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fordmondeo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
998 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 188
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Portsmouth England
     
Jul 16, 2017 10:15 |  #3

PineBomb wrote in post #18403247 (external link)
If sexiness is the measuring stick then I pick whichever one isn't wearing a coat.

So which would you choose?


Vaginator9000

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
3,226 posts
Likes: 357
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Post edited 11 months ago by davesrose.
     
Jul 16, 2017 10:18 |  #4

fordmondeo wrote in post #18403243 (external link)
I don't care about usefulness, weight, focal range, sharpness, price, what my primary uses are or bokeh.
Try and think bragging rights.

Well the 300mm is way more expensive, bigger, a white L telephoto, and can have shallower DOF (due to its focal length). Based on your measuring stick of bragging rights, isn't that the clear choice?;-)a


Canon 5D mk III , 7D mk II
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,349 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 459
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Jul 16, 2017 10:24 |  #5

davesrose wrote in post #18403249 (external link)
Well the 300mm is way more expensive, bigger, a white L telephoto, and can have shallower DOF (due to its focal length). Based on your measuring stick of bragging rights, isn't that the clear choice?;-)a

This is a silly topic, so I have no opinion for the OP, but I will just point out that at equal framing, the 200/2 will have shallower DOF than the 300/2.8 because it is one stop faster.

DOF is strictly a function of aperture and FOV.

The 300/2.8 may create more background blur on account of having greater magnification, especially when the background is far beyond the subject. But degree of blur and DOF are only somewhat related.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
3,226 posts
Likes: 357
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Post edited 11 months ago by davesrose.
     
Jul 16, 2017 10:27 as a reply to  @ JeffreyG's post |  #6

Opps, mis-read the OP: thought it was the 200mm 2.8L vs 300mm 2.8LII. For practicality of utilizing the full sensor, FL and shooting distance are factors in DOF. OK, 300mm is still more expensive and bigger...so that should be a factor for bragging rights :-)


Canon 5D mk III , 7D mk II
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
john ­ crossley
Goldmember
Avatar
2,144 posts
Likes: 629
Joined Nov 2009
Location: The Rhubarb Triangle
Post edited 11 months ago by john crossley.
     
Jul 16, 2017 10:28 |  #7

fordmondeo wrote in post #18403243 (external link)
Which of these two lenses is the outright sexy-est?

200mm f2L or 300mm f2.8L mk2

I don't care about usefulness, weight, focal range, sharpness, price, what my primary uses are or bokeh.
Try and think bragging rights.

Given the choice, what would you choose?

It's a bit like having to choose between Peggy Mount and Bella Emberg, I know who I'd go for.


Some days I'm the dog, some days I'm the lamppost.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fordmondeo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
998 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 188
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Portsmouth England
     
Jul 16, 2017 10:52 |  #8

john crossley wrote in post #18403257 (external link)
It's a bit like having to choose between Peggy Mount and Bella Emberg, I know who I'd go for.

Who?

Actually, I don't know who either of them are.

The 200mm f2 I'm guessing is the more rare of the two but the 300 f2.8 is a legendary lens (I'm not sure why)

I have to make up my mind by this coming Saturday as that's when I'm buying one.

I don't care what each one costs I just want to say, or not, look at this bad boy!


Vaginator9000

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
john ­ crossley
Goldmember
Avatar
2,144 posts
Likes: 629
Joined Nov 2009
Location: The Rhubarb Triangle
     
Jul 16, 2017 11:00 |  #9

fordmondeo wrote in post #18403272 (external link)
I have to make up my mind by this coming Saturday as that's when I'm buying one.

I don't care what each one costs I just want to say, or not, look at this bad boy!

So you are spending FIVE and a HALF GRAND on a lens for no other reason than vanity!!!!


Some days I'm the dog, some days I'm the lamppost.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MatthewK
Goldmember
Avatar
2,946 posts
Gallery: 448 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Maryland
     
Jul 16, 2017 11:00 |  #10

Since you've chosen to rule out the usual metrics, all that's left is to buy whichever strokes your ego most. No need to justify to anyone, just go for it.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Likes: 404
Joined Oct 2008
Location: *** vanished ***
     
Jul 16, 2017 11:01 |  #11

Depends on your definition of sexy.

The 200/2 is more exotic, but the 300/2.8 is bigger.

200/2 here. Size doesn't matter... it's how you use it ;-)a


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oingyboingybob
Member
Avatar
141 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 49
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Devon, UK
     
Jul 16, 2017 11:10 |  #12

Not wishing to offend in any way but this posting is frivolous to say the least. I'm only responding as I currently have the time....normally I would definitely not bother.


Canon: EOS 1DX, 100-400L Mkii, 70-300 f4-5.6 mkii, 24-105L, 100 f2.8L, 16-35 f4L
Sigma: 150-600C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
22,754 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 296
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jul 16, 2017 12:28 |  #13

makes as much sense as most either or posts


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400L II, sigma 15mm FE, 35mm ef-s macro, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L, gitzo GM4562, markins Q10, markins Q3, kirk, really right stuff, sirui

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,604 posts
Likes: 2560
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jul 16, 2017 12:33 |  #14

I agree with the posters who claim this is a silly and/or frivolous post. That begs the question, "So?". The internet has never had Relevance Police, which is as it should be.

To the topic at hand. My hands-down, no-brainer, easy-peasy choice would be the 200 f/2. Longer than that, I'd like a zoom. To me 300mm is a specialty lens.


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,604 posts
Likes: 2560
Joined Oct 2015
     
Jul 16, 2017 12:35 |  #15

ed rader wrote in post #18403342 (external link)
makes as much sense as most either or posts

Or the classic: "I shoot ETTL-II with auto-ISO in Av mode. Why isn't my camera doing what I want?"


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

10,462 views & 28 likes for this thread
Money or usefulness not the issue.
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is army1414
965 guests, 406 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.