Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Astronomy & Celestial Talk 
Thread started 07 Aug 2017 (Monday) 11:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Question about Canon's new IS binoculars for stargazing

 
Perfectly ­ Frank
I'm too sexy for my lens
3,697 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 1143
Joined Oct 2010
Post edited 11 months ago by Perfectly Frank.
     
Aug 07, 2017 11:30 |  #1

Canon has released 3 new binoculars that have improved image stabilization.

I'm interested in them for stargazing. They all have a 32 degree field of view, but come in different magnifications:
10x32, 12x32, 14x32. How important is magnification for stargazing? Should I just go for the highest power?

https://www.usa.canon.​com …ulars/20170802-Binoculars (external link)


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
PhotosGuy
Moderator
Avatar
75,348 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2172
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Aug 07, 2017 14:23 |  #2

No help here, but I'm wondering if the field of view is the same, wouldn't the magnification be the same?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
john ­ crossley
Goldmember
Avatar
2,166 posts
Likes: 640
Joined Nov 2009
Location: The Rhubarb Triangle
     
Aug 07, 2017 15:28 |  #3

Perfectly Frank wrote in post #18421277 (external link)
Canon has released 3 new binoculars that have improved image stabilization.

I'm interested in them for stargazing. They all have a 32 degree field of view, but come in different magnifications:
10x32, 12x32, 14x32. How important is magnification for stargazing? Should I just go for the highest power?

https://www.usa.canon.​com …ulars/20170802-Binoculars (external link)

No they don't.


10X32 Real Field of View 6.0° Apparent Field Of View 55.3°
12X32 Real Field of View 5.0° Apparent Field Of View 55.3°
14X32 Real Field of View 4.3° Apparent Field Of View 55.5°


Some days I'm the dog, some days I'm the lamppost.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,411 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Likes: 4510
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited 11 months ago by CyberDyneSystems. (5 edits in all)
     
Aug 07, 2017 16:20 |  #4

the 32mm in this case, or the 2nd number in all binocs, = the diameter of the front/objective lens element.

This is the limiting factor of how much light the binocs let in. It is the measurement used for a binoculars aperture. You do not get a ratio like we do with f/stop on camera lenses, just the original objective lens mm.

You can still compare to the aperture rating on a camera lens,. in that is gives you an idea of the light gathering ability.

However it is obviously more directly related to the front element of a camera lens, which in ratio with the magnification, results in the aperture f/stop value of a camera lens. In both cases the larger the front element, all else being equal the more light, (and usually more detail.)

With all three of these new binocs having the same 32mm, the one with the lowest "X" rating, ie: the 10x, will have the best light ratio,. essentially the largest f/stop.

In camera lenses, a 200mm f/2.8 will have the same diameter front element as a 400mm f/5.6.
The same amount of light went in to both, but double focal length of the 400mm will half the f/stop.

I am simplifying the terms of course.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfectly ­ Frank
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm too sexy for my lens
3,697 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 1143
Joined Oct 2010
     
Aug 07, 2017 18:31 |  #5

john crossley wrote in post #18421533 (external link)
No they don't.

10X32 Real Field of View 6.0° Apparent Field Of View 55.3°
12X32 Real Field of View 5.0° Apparent Field Of View 55.3°
14X32 Real Field of View 4.3° Apparent Field Of View 55.5°

Thanks for the correction. Canon shows this info on the spec page.


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfectly ­ Frank
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm too sexy for my lens
3,697 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Likes: 1143
Joined Oct 2010
     
Aug 07, 2017 18:46 |  #6

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18421588 (external link)
With all three of these new binocs having the same 32mm, the one with the lowest "X" rating, ie: the 10x, will have the best light ratio,. essentially the largest f/stop.

Thanks for the comments, CDS.

10x for the best light ratio would benefit stargazing. I also think the 10x32, having the largest real fov (6.0 degrees), would be the best choice,
since it allows the user to see more stars and celestial objects through the eyepiece. I believe stargazers value large fov over magnification.
But I want to see what other stargazers have to say.


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

853 views & 1 like for this thread
Question about Canon's new IS binoculars for stargazing
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Astronomy & Celestial Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ivan_xd
495 guests, 352 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.