Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 16 Aug 2017 (Wednesday) 22:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

sharpness advice.

 
Nickothurston
Member
Avatar
39 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 268
Joined Aug 2016
     
Aug 16, 2017 22:45 |  #1

Hello, I took this shot in pretty terrible light but I was just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for how to deal with heat shimmer or anything else I could have done to get a sharper cleaner image? thanks!

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/08/3/LQ_871206.jpg
Image hosted by forum (871206) © Nickothurston [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
Avatar
6,772 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 10453
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Florida
     
Aug 17, 2017 06:58 |  #2

Ya know.........there is such a thing as being too sharp.

And I think the heat shimmer adds to it.


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/147975282@N06 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Aug 17, 2017 07:32 |  #3

There is a ton of heat shimmer as evidenced in the ground area. Also, a TC is going to degrade IQ a bit. Finally, why shoot birds at f11? If you were very close, I guess I could see that, but if this was quite far, then f11 might be overkill and you might be hitting diffraction issues? I probably would have left it at f8 personally.

At 40' you have 6 inches of DOF, and if you place the focus on the bird properly, that is more than enough to get all of the bird in focus. I would almost suggest doing AFMA on the lens+TC to push your focus back quite a bit, almost +10.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nickothurston
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
39 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 268
Joined Aug 2016
Post edited over 6 years ago by Nickothurston.
     
Aug 17, 2017 11:45 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #4

Thanks for all the advice, I was shooting at f11 because I was very close about 12 to 15 feet, also how would the +10 help? just curious I am pretty new to microadjusting. thanks again.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed. (2 edits in all)
     
Aug 17, 2017 21:30 as a reply to  @ Nickothurston's post |  #5

Only the front of the bird is in focus, and it appears that the ground in front is focused. +10 is just from my experience, and if focus falls to far behind, bring the number down to around 7. You can store one adjustment just for the lens, and a separate one for the TC combo.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,915 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10108
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Aug 17, 2017 21:47 |  #6

Looking at EXIF, slightly higher ISO and slightly less stopped down = double or more your shutter speed.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
icor1031
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 307
Joined Jan 2015
     
Sep 06, 2017 01:26 |  #7

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18429894 (external link)
There is a ton of heat shimmer as evidenced in the ground area. Also, a TC is going to degrade IQ a bit. Finally, why shoot birds at f11? If you were very close, I guess I could see that, but if this was quite far, then f11 might be overkill and you might be hitting diffraction issues? I probably would have left it at f8 personally.

At 40' you have 6 inches of DOF, and if you place the focus on the bird properly, that is more than enough to get all of the bird in focus. I would almost suggest doing AFMA on the lens+TC to push your focus back quite a bit, almost +10.

Even if he isn't reaching diffraction limitation, he's probably well beyond f/ for peak sharpness.


Canon 5Ds || Zeiss Sonnar 135/2 || Zeiss Otus 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 50/1.4 || Tamron SP 35/1.4
Ideal Portraits (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,784 views & 2 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
sharpness advice.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
886 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.