Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 14 Sep 2017 (Thursday) 14:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4000 vs 8000 shutter speed

 
James ­ Crockett
Senior Member
Avatar
288 posts
Likes: 93
Joined May 2017
     
Sep 14, 2017 14:15 |  #1

Do you really need 8000 shutter speed? Thanks and take care.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NullMember
Goldmember
3,019 posts
Likes: 1130
Joined Nov 2009
     
Sep 14, 2017 14:16 |  #2
bannedPermanently

James Crockett wrote in post #18452313 (external link)
Do you really need 8000 shutter speed? Thanks and take care.

Yes




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chet
showed up to keep the place interesting
44,018 posts
Gallery: 132 photos
Likes: 2462
Joined Sep 2007
Post edited over 6 years ago by Chet.
     
Sep 14, 2017 14:23 |  #3

For sure. (Though anything above 1/7999 is just silly)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 14, 2017 14:28 |  #4

Depends on what you shoot. When I shot the eclipse to get the diamond and Bailie's beads, it sure helped.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Sep 14, 2017 14:28 |  #5

Sometimes.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MrWho
Goldmember
1,207 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Aug 2009
Location: North of Baltimore, MD
     
Sep 15, 2017 00:14 |  #6

I personally can't remember the last time I've seen a shutter speed over 1/4000.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Sep 15, 2017 00:21 |  #7

In my current Lr catalog I have 128 images shot at 1/8000 of a second.


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,008 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5399
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
Sep 15, 2017 00:24 |  #8

No. If you find that 1/4000s isn't fast enough, stop the lens down a tiny bit. Not nearly as big a deal as some make it out to be.


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wunhang
Senior Member
Avatar
726 posts
Likes: 52
Joined Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
     
Sep 15, 2017 00:48 |  #9

In my Lightroom catalog, my counts are as follows:
~25,400 photos
172 at 1/8000
52 at 1/6400
14 at 1/6000
63 at 1/5000
182 at 1/4000

So that means I used high shutter speeds (at or above 1/4000) less than 2% of the time. And within that 2% of the time, I needed faster than 1/4000 over 60% of the time.
Just some data from this amateur to mull over.


Canon 5D IV | Canon 5D II | XSI (Infrared modified) | SL1 | 16-35mm L f/4.0 IS | 24-70mm L f/2.8 II | 40mm f/2.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 70-200mm L f/4.0 IS | Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 | C/Y 28mm f/2.8 | Tamron 35mm f/1.8 VC | C/Y 50mm f/1.7 | Zeiss 100mm MP
::SmugMug (external link)::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Sep 15, 2017 04:46 |  #10

James Crockett wrote in post #18452313 (external link)
Do you really need 8000 shutter speed? Thanks and take care.

Do I? Yes.

Do you? *Shrug*

I do a lot of HSS large aperture portraits, so I do use shutter speeds between 1/4000s & 1/8000s. I also can just use a low power ND filter. But, I would prefer not to fiddle around with more equipment when possible, so I prefer to have all the options I can in the tool and not just add more stuff externally to it. For that purpose, stopping down isn't something I want to do. And again, while I could use a ND filter, I just don't want to if I don't have to (fiddling with a filter in the field with rapidly changing light is not my cup of tea).

There are few, few times you actually need 1/8000s shutter speed. Personally if I need to freeze apparent motion, I'd rather do it with lighting because it's better at it. An example in the real world of this would be the beating wings of a bee for example (I'd rather freeze that with lighting, rather than attempting to do it with a fast shutter; assuming I didn't want motion blur).

If you don't know if you need 1/8000s or not, you probably don't?

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Naturalist
Adrift on a lonely vast sea
5,769 posts
Likes: 1251
Joined May 2007
     
Sep 15, 2017 06:04 |  #11

I need 1/8000 about as often as I need ISO 8000 - which is RARE.



5D Mk IV & 7D Mk II
EF 16-35 f/4L EF 50 f/1.8 (Original) EF 24-105 f/4L EF 100 f/2.8L Macro EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L[/FONT]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed. (6 edits in all)
     
Sep 15, 2017 06:43 |  #12

If you have fast primes and shoot a wide mix of scenes and conditions, you will invariably need 1/8000th. There are people that shoot ISO 50, and would like ISO 25, which is really quite similar in nature. You either shoot at a lower ISO, or a faster shutter, while maintaining the exact look you want DOF wise by locking down aperture.

Once you get an 85L, for example, you will find many times you could really use 1/8000th. The magic you can produce with the control of DOF of that lens will make you want to shoot it quite a bit, even during the late morning/early afternoon hours outside. 1/4000th won't cut in those cases. :)

Sure one could shut down the 85L 1 stop, but having had one and trying that, I would prefer to not sacrifice the look I was going for, and would rather have 1/8000th and/or ISO 50/25. Shutting down the lens is a suboptimal suggestion, why not just keep a 1 stop ND filter with you for the fast lenses you own. At least with that, you get all the control you want, and 1/4000th would be enough unless you are also dealing with some really fast motion that you want to stop, then an ND won't help either.

If you need 1/8000th, then you would most likely know it, and thus would stay away from cameras like the 6D as your primary camera right out of the gate. If you aren't sure why you need 1/8000th, then you really don't need it, at the current moment anyways.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
8,075 posts
Likes: 2742
Joined Oct 2015
     
Sep 15, 2017 07:37 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

I recently gained a whole new perspective on 1/4000. I have almost never run into the 1/4000 'problem' with my 6D. I've always had ISO 50 available, and stopping down 1/3 to 2/3 stop never seemed like much of a sacrifice. Last weekend I was outside with my new camera, and the 85 1.8. I ended up having to stop down to f/4-4.5 a few times, because I was limited to 1/4000... by my ASA 200 Fuji Film. With the 6D, I could have shot at f/2. With the Elan 7NE, I was stuck two stops slower. Glad I didn't have 800 film loaded. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Sep 15, 2017 08:35 |  #14

ASA? OMG!

;)


1/4000 has not been a problem for me. A polarizer is about a stop of difference and I often shoot with one outside anyway.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Sep 15, 2017 10:00 |  #15

Anytime you want to shoot F1.4 in the full sun. You need 1/8000

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/09/3/LQ_876306.jpg
Image hosted by forum (876306) © Talley [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

50,949 views & 33 likes for this thread, 39 members have posted to it and it is followed by 18 members.
4000 vs 8000 shutter speed
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1484 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.