dshgdgfjjjdghjfxcfzc
NullMember Goldmember 3,019 posts Likes: 1130 Joined Nov 2009 More info Post edited over 2 years ago by NullMember. | Sep 15, 2017 05:55 | #1 Permanentlydshgdgfjjjdghjfxcfzc
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joeseph "smells like turd" More info | Sep 15, 2017 06:05 | #2 Indeed! some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EightEleven Car enthusiast and an all around nice guy More info | Sep 15, 2017 06:58 | #3 DOn't forget about the fact that it will obsolete itself in 3 years. At that point it will so down beyond frustration! Ron Snarski
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mbellot "My dog ate my title" 3,365 posts Likes: 20 Joined Jul 2005 Location: The Miami of Canada - Chicago! More info | Sep 15, 2017 09:01 | #4 EightEleven wrote in post #18452839 DOn't forget about the fact that it will obsolete itself in 3 years. At that point it will so down beyond frustration! No, it will be obsolete in 12-18 months.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,733 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Sep 15, 2017 09:38 | #5 I'm still chuckling at the face recognition failure at the launch. How embarrassing. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,733 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Sep 15, 2017 09:41 | #6 Also, I'm wondering, can't I unlock the phone with a picture of the owners face? Just doesn't seem secure. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 15, 2017 13:12 | #7 gjl711 wrote in post #18452904 Also, I'm wondering, can't I unlock the phone with a picture of the owners face? Just doesn't seem secure. it's a 3D sensor uses some 30,000 points of scan to detect the 3d structure of the person. Sure it can be fooled by identical twins perhaps but other then that should be pretty secure. My surface pro uses an infared sensor for face unlock. Doesn't work with a photo. I've tried. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 15, 2017 13:30 | #8 Keep in mind, as some chuckle and shake their heads an a $999 phone others chuckle and shake their heads at $2000 camera's and lenses.. Bas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
not only professional photographers are buying $2000 cameras and lenses. The majority will be amateurs and hobbyists. Bas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 15, 2017 14:11 | #10 john crossley wrote in post #18453055 Aye, but top-end cameras and lenses are aimed at professional photographers. You don't get professional phone users, do you? without my phone I could not perform my profession.... A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,733 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Sep 15, 2017 14:29 | #11 john crossley wrote in post #18453055 Aye, but top-end cameras and lenses are aimed at professional photographers. You don't get professional phone users, do you? Talley wrote in post #18453076 without my phone I could not perform my profession...... I'm with Tally on this one, without my phone, it would be very hard to do my job. The phone has become so integrated in day to day business operations that I always have a spare nearby just in case my primary fails. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nogo POTN record for # of posts during "Permanent Ban" 9,193 posts Gallery: 17 photos Likes: 685 Joined Dec 2013 Location: All Along the Natchez Trace (Clinton, MS) More info | Sep 15, 2017 14:54 | #12 But the question is, do you need the latest and greatest? Philip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pekka El General Moderator More info | Sep 15, 2017 14:54 | #13 mbellot wrote in post #18452884 No, it will be obsolete in 12-18 months. Apple will discontinue all support for it in three years. No, 5 years minimum. Actually, Apple delivers system and security updates way longer than Google does. Also, critical security updates may not reach most Android devices at all. The Forum Boss, El General Moderator
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 15, 2017 19:37 | #14 Nogo wrote in post #18453101 But the question is, do you need the latest and greatest? I have a Galaxy S7. I see no reason to update this generation or the next. What can a new phone do better that is worth another thousand bucks USD? I have a Iphone 6 plus... it's what 3 years old. Still original screen and still looks great but mine started ghost touching and so I replaced the screen and didn't help it any. I got my monies worth. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nope, not a failure. Several people had played with phone just before presentation and phone gave up trying to figure out proper owner and asked for pin number. Just did what it was designed to do.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1521 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||