Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 22 Sep 2017 (Friday) 08:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How to check a used 14mm 2.8 before buying?

 
kaitlyn2004
Goldmember
1,694 posts
Likes: 204
Joined Oct 2009
     
Sep 22, 2017 08:19 |  #1

I don't normally buy used lenses, and especially one that is known for such variety in QC... but that could happen buying new anyway too.

So how do I actually check the lens to make sure it's "good enough" - what benchmarks would I use?

I recall hearing about uneven focusing across the frame and the distortion (but not sure if the distortion differs across copies?)

Many thanks! This lens looks harder to buy than I thought...


My Landscape Photography Videos (external link)
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
Post edited over 6 years ago by MalVeauX.
     
Sep 22, 2017 08:31 |  #2

I don't think you'd be able to tell on an LCD on the camera, especially stopped down.

You'd really need to pixel peep on a monitor to see it most likely.

Maybe wide open (F2.8) and minimum focus distance and then compare corners on LCD at highest magnification?

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaitlyn2004
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,694 posts
Likes: 204
Joined Oct 2009
     
Sep 22, 2017 08:52 |  #3

MalVeauX wrote in post #18457763 (external link)
I don't think you'd be able to tell on an LCD on the camera, especially stopped down.

You'd really need to pixel peep on a monitor to see it most likely.

Maybe wide open (F2.8) and minimum focus distance and then compare corners on LCD at highest magnification?

Very best,

Hmm, could also ask them to send me a sample shot... just of a wall with detail on it? To check evenness throughout frame?


My Landscape Photography Videos (external link)
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Sep 22, 2017 08:53 |  #4

kaitlyn2004 wrote in post #18457779 (external link)
Hmm, could also ask them to send me a sample shot... just of a wall with detail on it? To check evenness throughout frame?

Brick wall or tree foliage at F2.8 and F16 should show something if there's something. Just don't misjudge distortion for out of focus.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
01Ryan10
Goldmember
1,115 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 3201
Joined Aug 2012
Location: OC, California
     
Sep 27, 2017 14:08 |  #5

I'd suggest to just buy the Rokinon variety 14mm 2.8 brand new from reputable store. Return for new if needed.


http://RyanLunaPhotogr​aphy.com (external link)
IG: @01ryanluna10 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaitlyn2004
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,694 posts
Likes: 204
Joined Oct 2009
     
Sep 27, 2017 20:34 |  #6

01Ryan10 wrote in post #18461584 (external link)
I'd suggest to just buy the Rokinon variety 14mm 2.8 brand new from reputable store. Return for new if needed.

Why do you recommend the more-expensive rokinon if they're all just rebadges? What's the difference in buying the namebrand?


My Landscape Photography Videos (external link)
My Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
01Ryan10
Goldmember
1,115 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 3201
Joined Aug 2012
Location: OC, California
     
Sep 27, 2017 20:40 |  #7

kaitlyn2004 wrote in post #18461812 (external link)
Why do you recommend the more-expensive rokinon if they're all just rebadges? What's the difference in buying the namebrand?


I mean...buy any name, just make it new.


http://RyanLunaPhotogr​aphy.com (external link)
IG: @01ryanluna10 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Sep 27, 2017 20:53 |  #8

Brick wall, make sure you are set up parallel and about 8-10 feet away. Check each corner as compared to the middle.


Checking on the screen was plenty for me to see trouble in a potential purchase so I declined. It was craingslist/in person though.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AdamT
Member
43 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2013
     
Dec 30, 2017 23:12 |  #9

You could see a lack of sharpness in the corners on the screen!? Can this lens be that bad sometimes?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Dec 31, 2017 09:02 |  #10

At the corners of an image check for coma and try finding reviews and see if the lens is tack sharp or known for soft images . Yes a brick wall is good . Ask for an unedited image in RAW so corners can be checked up close .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,373 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1378
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Jan 03, 2018 19:37 |  #11

Look at the lens very closely--even using a magnifying glass-- for any signs of impact. Look carefully around the focusing ring for any misalignment. Look through it, hold it up to the light, angle it to your eye, for any signs of scratching or fogging or fungus. Twist the focusing ring off the camera and listen and feel carefully for any rubbing. Put it on a camera, focus at different distances and listen to the motor carefully. Watch it as it focuses for any hitches.

Smell it--yes, smell it.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,665 views & 1 like for this thread, 7 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
How to check a used 14mm 2.8 before buying?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1504 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.