Sony RX10 mk IV share your thoughts, interest, images.

Choderboy wrote in post #18655367
3736 pixel wide crop. So to meet my personal standards, I can crop off nearly 2000 pixels on the wide side and make an 8x12 print.
(Assuming good light, which I had for this)

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/K7fr​Xa RXA00610_1_3736cr_1280​dmp by Choderboy, on Flickr

So Choder would not you agree that anyone into bierds/BIF/wildlife/ma​cro(thanks to Gary) is seriously remiss not looking strongly at the 10iv

MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #18655467
So Choder would not you agree that anyone into bierds/BIF/wildlife/ma​cro(thanks to Gary) is seriously remiss not looking strongly at the 10iv

Absolutely. It's not like this thread is in the 'sealed section'. The evidence is posted here for anyone to evaluate.

Anyone with input to JPG Standard/Fine/Extra Fine?
I did not even notice the Extra fine and chose Fine when I was setting up. I'm thinking now that Fine and Extra Fine are just Standard but with sharpening applied. So today I have changed to Standard.

I think results are cleaner, this is a crop, (4032 pixel wide crop) ISO 400. Just a wee bit of USM applied to the bird. (6/1.0/0 in CS4)

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/27Fc​Q1f

Male powerful owl holding a ring-tailed possum. Great application for the RX10, it's in mangroves, not a particularly friendly photography environment.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/27oJ​Lwn

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/28LF​5hg

Choderboy wrote in post #18655481
Absolutely. It's not like this thread is in the 'sealed section'. The evidence is posted here for anyone to evaluate.

Anyone with input to JPG Standard/Fine/Extra Fine?
I did not even notice the Extra fine and chose Fine when I was setting up. I'm thinking now that Fine and Extra Fine are just Standard but with sharpening applied. So today I have changed to Standard.

I think results are cleaner, this is a crop, (4032 pixel wide crop) ISO 400. Just a wee bit of USM applied to the bird. (6/1.0/0 in CS4)

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/27Fc​Q1f RXA00729_4032cr_1280dm​p by Choderboy, on Flickr

I've always used extra fine. The image file size is bigger and seems to give me a little bit more to play.

Yeah, I took 3 sets of Standard, Fine and Extra Fine today, noticed the file sizes. I'll have to do some fiddling and see what I can find. I think I was wrong about the sharpening.

I just received my Rx a few days ago. Now to figure out the settings . I hope to soon post images as impressive as those viewed here.

Irene

Choderboy wrote in post #18655367
3736 pixel wide crop. So to meet my personal standards, I can crop off nearly 2000 pixels on the wide side and make an 8x12 print.
(Assuming good light, which I had for this)

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/K7fr​Xa RXA00610_1_3736cr_1280​dmp by Choderboy, on Flickr

That is a nice one, Dave.

Shot X-fine. I find myself shooting jpeg with this rig.

IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug​.com …7-3-18-11-X2.jpg&lb=1&s=A

Will in Tejas wrote in post #18655833
Shot X-fine. I find myself shooting jpeg with this rig.

IMAGE LINK: https://photos.smugmug​.com …7-3-18-11-X2.jpg&lb=1&s=A on Smugmug

Super nice shot, Bill!!

Lame-Duck wrote in post #18655873
Super nice shot, Bill!!

Thank you Mike.

Will in Tejas wrote in post #18656162

Hosted photo: posted by Bill in Texas in
./showthread.php?p=186​56162&i=i132025971
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

Very nice, Bill - super sharp!

Thanks Phil.

Snack anyone...???...

EyeSpyEagle wrote in post #18656419
Snack anyone...???...

Hosted photo: posted by EyeSpyEagle in
./showthread.php?p=186​56419&i=i264658438
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

Nice shot, but I have to ask. What is he eating, I seem to remember seeing these as a kid but never knew what they where.