Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 07 Oct 2017 (Saturday) 13:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Mini-Review: YongNuo 2x III TC (Canon Knockoff)

 
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,518 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6398
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Oct 08, 2017 01:32 |  #16

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18468204 (external link)
I wonder if the firmware is the issue, thus my inquiry about the Canon TC and Sigma lens. They may look the same but what about the software? ;)

I had the Sigma 150-600 Sport. With Canon 1.4TCs, 1.4TCII works with 7D2 but not with 1.4TCIII. I had the updated Sigma firmware, I believe with the original firmware both versions of the Canon 1.4TC would work. I was surprised Sigma did that.

I have a Canon 2X TCIII and have done extensive comparisons with a Sigma APO EX DG 2X. On EF300F4 IS L, EF 100-400 II, EF 200 2.8L, EF 500 F4 IS L, Sigma 150-600 Sport, results were consistent: the Sigma is just slightly better. Slightly sharper, slightly more contrast. Another POTN member found the same results and used two Canon TCs. So either we are both unlucky and have 3 bad Canon TCs between us, or.....


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
THREAD ­ STARTER
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Oct 08, 2017 06:17 |  #17

So the Canon 2x III works with the Sigma 150-600?


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Likes: 407
Joined Oct 2008
Location: *** vanished ***
     
Oct 08, 2017 09:58 |  #18

Talley wrote in post #18468194 (external link)
ya same design so no won't work either.

Are we sure it is the very same design ?
Canon's designs are all patented, and that should be enough to stop sales of the knockoff lens in many countries.
The 50/1.8 knockoff has a different design than the original Canon.


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Oct 08, 2017 11:52 |  #19

what i mean is the kenko front of the TC the element doesn't protrude meaning it can fit all lenses. the canon and this yongnou thingy have protruding elements. It won't mount to all lenses... unless they have the rear element recessed in.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,518 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6398
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Oct 08, 2017 14:58 |  #20

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18468279 (external link)
So the Canon 2x III works with the Sigma 150-600?

It did, but I can't remember body. 1DS2, 1D4 or 7D2.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basketballfreak6
Goldmember
1,561 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3485
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Oct 08, 2017 17:08 |  #21

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18467921 (external link)
So now I move onto the desire to use this TC on other lenses. Two issues arise out of this. First is that since the front element sticks out on the TC, any lens you have where the rear element moves in and out to being almost flush with the electronic contacts, you cannot use this TC. This could be much like the Canon as well, but I don't know. This means that I cannot use this on my 24-70 or 100 macro, not that I would really want to anyways.

yea as far as i am aware only kenko don't have the protruding part, which was why i originally bought it (since i often stack it with my 100L macro) and still have it despite now also having the sigma 1401 TC


https://www.tonyliupho​tography.com.au/ (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/tonyliuphotography​/ (external link)
flickr (external link)
R6, M6II, modified 77D, 16-35L f/4 IS, 24-70L II f/2.8, 70-200L IS II f/2.8, S150-600 f/5-6.3 C, S14 f/1.8 ART, S50 f/1.4 ART, S135 f/1.8 ART, 100L IS Macro f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,518 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6398
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Oct 08, 2017 18:08 |  #22

You will probably be able to stack using a 12mm tube between the TCs and still be able to focus on the moon.
I have done this with several long lenses. Some do not have enough focus movement past infinity to allow that.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,518 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6398
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Post edited over 6 years ago by Choderboy.
     
Oct 08, 2017 18:20 |  #23

Choderboy wrote in post #18468523 (external link)
It did, but I can't remember body. 1DS2, 1D4 or 7D2.

Memory failing of what occurred over 12 months ago...

1D4, Sigma 150-600 Sport and a 2X TC was used for this photo. I know when I tried the Sigma 2XTC and the 150-600 S I got an error with at least one of my bodies due to Sigma's cruel firmware update. I'll check when I get home to see if I can work out which 2XTC this was.

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1710/26117082964_3536061b0d_b.jpg

Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Philihase
Member
201 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 559
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Giessen Germany
Post edited over 6 years ago by Philihase.
     
Oct 09, 2017 07:38 as a reply to  @ Choderboy's post |  #24

After an update to the Sigma 150 600 sports firmware the Canon 1.4 Mk 3
extender stoped working for me on a 7D2.


https://www.facebook.c​om …e-Photos-852961268075109/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pcs
I suddenly feel very old
3,680 posts
Likes: 32331
Joined Apr 2010
     
Oct 11, 2017 15:31 |  #25

On my 5DIII the canon 2xEXIII works(but of course no autofocus), the canon 1.4EXIII gives an error. I contacted Sigma if a (future) software update would change this and their reply was they only support their own extenders.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
THREAD ­ STARTER
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed. (3 edits in all)
     
Oct 11, 2017 16:11 |  #26

Like I have found out, different canon models behave differently with the TC and the sigma 150-600. You might find out that the 7d2 and 5d4 throws an error with the 2x and sigma.

Still waiting for somebody that has the canon 2x III and sigma with either of these bodies I mentioned to say they have no issues.

EDIT: So, I forgot I had the SL2, so I tried the YN 2x on the Sigma on it. No overexposure issues, and no errors. Obviously it won't AF when it is at f11. However I can MF the lens and get good results.

So 3 different cameras, same TC and lens, 3 different behaviors....

7D2 - 2.5 stops over exposure on the 70-200II and errors out on the Sigma after I hit the shutter
5D4 - 3 stops over exposure on the 70-200II and errors out as soon as I turn on the camera
SL2 - Exposes perfectly on the 70-200II and has no errors at all with the Sigma

So it appears I have a working combination with the YN 2x and Sigma, and since none of the 3 bodies AF at f11, AF isn't really an issue there.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
Post edited over 6 years ago by CyberDyneSystems. (2 edits in all)
     
Oct 11, 2017 16:54 |  #27

TeamSpeed wrote in post #18470661 (external link)
....

Still waiting for somebody that has the canon 2x III and sigma with either of these bodies I mentioned to say they have no issues.....


Oh geez,. guess I'll cave and give it a try. (with Canon TC, don't have Yongnuo)

why haven't I?

Simply put, I would not under any circumstance consider a 2X TC on a 600mm f/6.3 zoom a viable option, and I don't need to try to understand why it will fail.

When/if I do get around to it, I am confident I will be among those that have problems. There is no reason why it should work. Canon says it won't, Sigma says it won't,. so?


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,518 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6398
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Post edited over 6 years ago by Choderboy.
     
Oct 11, 2017 17:59 |  #28

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18470684 (external link)
Oh geez,. guess I'll cave and give it a try. (with Canon TC, don't have Yongnuo)

why haven't I?

Simply put, I would not under any circumstance consider a 2X TC on a 600mm f/6.3 zoom a viable option, and I don't need to try to understand why it will fail.

When/if I do get around to it, I am confident I will be among those that have problems. There is no reason why it should work. Canon says it won't, Sigma says it won't,. so?

See my example. I achieved what I wanted but the goal was more documentary. Useful to me as I can see both Osprey are carrying sticks, ie photographic evidence of both sexes involved in nest building. I found I can identify male or female at about 500 metres (a third of a mile). Photo above they were around 320 metres. At that same distance I was able to easily ID a Peregrine falcon. Therefore I am pretty unhappy about Sigma removing the ability to take a photo, if I decide I want to.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
THREAD ­ STARTER
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed. (4 edits in all)
     
Oct 11, 2017 20:28 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #29

Actually, I will use the 2x on the 150-600, but obviously when I need to manually focus. In good sunlight with the pins taped on the Kenko 2x, my cameras would AF and work very well at the zoo safari exhibits

Examples of the Kenko 2x on the Sigma 50-500, for example.

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/Animals/In-the-Wild-Yonder/i-3xmN2Cn/0/2cabc971/X2/7D1_7066-X2.jpg

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/Animals/In-the-Wild-Yonder/i-hx6ZGLx/0/6413b298/X2/7D1_7053-X2.jpg

In fact for moon shots, I will most likely double or triple stack my TCs for a 5300mm FOV on my crop body. However, where I have been able to do a 2x + 1.4x handheld up to this point, adding another 2x will require a tripod.

Up to this point, I am handholding the 2 Kenkos stacked on the 150-600, and want to get a bit closer yet. :)

IMAGE: https://photos.smugmug.com/Still-Life/Scenic-Moments/i-bKCmtWd/0/01dcddaa/X3/216A8311-X3.jpg

Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
THREAD ­ STARTER
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 6 years ago by TeamSpeed.
     
Oct 21, 2017 20:01 |  #30

So a few shots today with the 2x and 70-200.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/10/3/LQ_881987.jpg
Image hosted by forum (881987) © TeamSpeed [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/10/3/LQ_881989.jpg
Image hosted by forum (881989) © TeamSpeed [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

39,914 views & 14 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it and it is followed by 5 members.
Mini-Review: YongNuo 2x III TC (Canon Knockoff)
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1555 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.