Looks to me like you just need better light and GET CLOSER to those small birds.
ETS Senior Member More info | Jun 11, 2018 16:18 | #346 Looks to me like you just need better light and GET CLOSER to those small birds. Fuji X-T2,5D MKII,Rebel XTi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Eddie xpfloyd lookalike More info | Jun 11, 2018 16:24 | #347 Will in Tejas wrote in post #18643419 This is with the 1.4 and the lens looks pretty sharp here. Hosted photo: posted by Bill in Texas in ./showthread.php?p=18643419&i=i87867793 forum: Sony Digital Cameras Looks sharp and noise looks good too Leica M11 | Leica Q2 | Sony α7RV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillinTexas Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 11, 2018 16:54 | #348 ETS wrote in post #18643423 Looks to me like you just need better light and GET CLOSER to those small birds. Well one reason I bought this camera is the great low light performance it is said to possess. I agree on the get closer. xpfloyd wrote in post #18643431 Looks sharp and noise looks good too Thanks Eddie. Bill being Smug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ETS Senior Member More info | Jun 11, 2018 18:32 | #349 Will in Tejas wrote in post #18643450 Well one reason I bought this camera is the great low light performance it is said to possess. I agree on the get closer. Thanks Eddie. Yes, but even with good low light performance you still need to make sure your light source is directly hitting on the bird and that the background light is not brighter than that. Fuji X-T2,5D MKII,Rebel XTi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillinTexas Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 11, 2018 19:14 | #350 ETS wrote in post #18643488 Yes, but even with good low light performance you still need to make sure your light source is directly hitting on the bird and that the background light is not brighter than that. Agreed but I've been able to cheat it abit using Canon but we're also talking 20-24 mp in the Canon bodies. Bill being Smug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 11, 2018 19:46 | #351 Will in Tejas wrote in post #18643509 Agreed but I've been able to cheat it abit using Canon but we're also talking 20-24 mp in the Canon bodies. if you have you're older body still, I think you should do a proper test. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Eddie xpfloyd lookalike More info | Jun 12, 2018 00:05 | #352 Did you check the raws I sent Will? Leica M11 | Leica Q2 | Sony α7RV
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillinTexas Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 12, 2018 04:06 | #353 xpfloyd wrote in post #18643655 Did you check the raws I sent Will? Yes and thanks again for sending them. I want to replicate the settings to see what happens. Bill being Smug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillinTexas Cream of the Crop More info | I still have a 7DmkII body but not a single Canon lens at the moment. Bill being Smug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillinTexas Cream of the Crop More info Post edited over 5 years ago by Bill in Texas. (2 edits in all) | Jun 12, 2018 16:17 | #355 Eddie thanks for giving me something to compare to. Thanks to all that answered questions and offered suggestions. Talley these were with the FE 100-400. I removed the 1.4 x for these. Bill being Smug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillinTexas Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 18, 2018 17:56 | #356 Bill being Smug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillinTexas Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 21, 2018 15:48 | #357 Is there a thread here anywhere (I can't find one) that speaks to using an adapted Tamron or Sigma 150-600 with the RIII? I just purchased a Tammy G2 and put it on and it works great except for the noise it makes and doesn't stop without turning off the camera. I would like to read the experiences of others. Thanks Bill being Smug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lame-Duck I have indeed had pine nuts More info | On my screen Bill, I'm honestly not seeing objectionable noise. On the finch image I barely see any noise in the green area, and none on the bird...certainly not objectionable. LD, or Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillinTexas Cream of the Crop More info | Jun 23, 2018 16:26 | #359 Lame-Duck wrote in post #18650092 On my screen Bill, I'm honestly not seeing objectionable noise. On the finch image I barely see any noise in the green area, and none on the bird...certainly not objectionable. Thanks Mike. Actually I'm talking about noise from the lens or camera, not sure which. Like a motor running. Bill being Smug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lame-Duck I have indeed had pine nuts More info | Jun 23, 2018 16:41 | #360 Will in Tejas wrote in post #18650094 Thanks Mike. Actually I'm talking about noise from the lens or camera, not sure which. Like a motor running. Ahhhhhhh...sorry about that, I had it all wrong. LD, or Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1070 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||