Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Digital Cameras 
Thread started 25 Oct 2017 (Wednesday) 03:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sony a7R III

 
ETS
Senior Member
Avatar
755 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 666
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Cocoa, Florida
     
Jun 11, 2018 16:18 |  #346

Looks to me like you just need better light and GET CLOSER to those small birds.


Fuji X-T2,5D MKII,Rebel XTi
17-40L, 70-200 F4L, 400mm F5.6L, 100mm F2.8L, Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art
580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eddie
xpfloyd lookalike
Avatar
14,822 posts
Gallery: 719 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 10923
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
     
Jun 11, 2018 16:24 |  #347

Will in Tejas wrote in post #18643419 (external link)
This is with the 1.4 and the lens looks pretty sharp here.

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by Bill in Texas in
./showthread.php?p=186​43419&i=i87867793
forum: Sony Digital Cameras

Looks sharp and noise looks good too


Leica M11 | Leica Q2 | Sony α7RV
Voigtlander 28 f/2 Ulton II | Leica 50 Summilux ASPH
16-35GM | 24GM | 35GM | 85GM | Tamron 35-150 | Sigma 105 Macro Art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ in ­ Texas
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,012 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 191860
Joined Mar 2014
Location: SE Texas
     
Jun 11, 2018 16:54 |  #348

ETS wrote in post #18643423 (external link)
Looks to me like you just need better light and GET CLOSER to those small birds.

Well one reason I bought this camera is the great low light performance it is said to possess. I agree on the get closer.

xpfloyd wrote in post #18643431 (external link)
Looks sharp and noise looks good too

Thanks Eddie.


Bill being Smug (external link)
Bill's flickr (external link)
Sony a7, a1, a9, Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Lens, Tamron 70-180mm, F2.8 Di III VXD, Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6,3 GM OSS, Sony FE 1.4X teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ETS
Senior Member
Avatar
755 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 666
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Cocoa, Florida
     
Jun 11, 2018 18:32 |  #349

Will in Tejas wrote in post #18643450 (external link)
Well one reason I bought this camera is the great low light performance it is said to possess. I agree on the get closer.

Thanks Eddie.

Yes, but even with good low light performance you still need to make sure your light source is directly hitting on the bird and that the background light is not brighter than that.


Fuji X-T2,5D MKII,Rebel XTi
17-40L, 70-200 F4L, 400mm F5.6L, 100mm F2.8L, Sigma 35mm f1.4 Art
580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ in ­ Texas
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,012 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 191860
Joined Mar 2014
Location: SE Texas
     
Jun 11, 2018 19:14 |  #350

ETS wrote in post #18643488 (external link)
Yes, but even with good low light performance you still need to make sure your light source is directly hitting on the bird and that the background light is not brighter than that.

Agreed but I've been able to cheat it abit using Canon but we're also talking 20-24 mp in the Canon bodies.


Bill being Smug (external link)
Bill's flickr (external link)
Sony a7, a1, a9, Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Lens, Tamron 70-180mm, F2.8 Di III VXD, Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6,3 GM OSS, Sony FE 1.4X teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Jun 11, 2018 19:46 |  #351

Will in Tejas wrote in post #18643509 (external link)
Agreed but I've been able to cheat it abit using Canon but we're also talking 20-24 mp in the Canon bodies.

if you have you're older body still, I think you should do a proper test.

On a tripod, I've found the older 6D to be noticeably inferior when files compared to the Sony. I tested simply on a tripod, the 70-200mkii, and an electric pole far way.

Focused wide open, stopped down to f8, the Canon was much softer, when equalized in size. This type of testing will get rid of the guesswork.

My impression is that testing with long lenses becomes increasingly difficult when hard crops and live subjects are involved.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eddie
xpfloyd lookalike
Avatar
14,822 posts
Gallery: 719 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 10923
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
     
Jun 12, 2018 00:05 |  #352

Did you check the raws I sent Will?


Leica M11 | Leica Q2 | Sony α7RV
Voigtlander 28 f/2 Ulton II | Leica 50 Summilux ASPH
16-35GM | 24GM | 35GM | 85GM | Tamron 35-150 | Sigma 105 Macro Art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ in ­ Texas
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,012 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 191860
Joined Mar 2014
Location: SE Texas
     
Jun 12, 2018 04:06 |  #353

xpfloyd wrote in post #18643655 (external link)
Did you check the raws I sent Will?

Yes and thanks again for sending them. I want to replicate the settings to see what happens.


Bill being Smug (external link)
Bill's flickr (external link)
Sony a7, a1, a9, Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Lens, Tamron 70-180mm, F2.8 Di III VXD, Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6,3 GM OSS, Sony FE 1.4X teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ in ­ Texas
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,012 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 191860
Joined Mar 2014
Location: SE Texas
     
Jun 12, 2018 04:10 as a reply to  @ Charlie's post |  #354

I still have a 7DmkII body but not a single Canon lens at the moment.


Bill being Smug (external link)
Bill's flickr (external link)
Sony a7, a1, a9, Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Lens, Tamron 70-180mm, F2.8 Di III VXD, Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6,3 GM OSS, Sony FE 1.4X teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ in ­ Texas
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,012 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 191860
Joined Mar 2014
Location: SE Texas
Post edited over 5 years ago by Bill in Texas. (2 edits in all)
     
Jun 12, 2018 16:17 |  #355

Eddie thanks for giving me something to compare to. Thanks to all that answered questions and offered suggestions. Talley these were with the FE 100-400. I removed the 1.4 x for these.

I took these a little while ago. I started at ISO 100 and ended at 3200 in the sun and 6400 in the shadows of the porch. I think I'm good. I did learn something from this which is 0 the sharpening Lightroom and the fact that this noise has to be dealt with differently due to the 42 mp the camera puts out. Anyway a shot in the sun, 3200 and shot in the shadows/shade, 6400. I did nothing to these except resize for posting here.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Bill being Smug (external link)
Bill's flickr (external link)
Sony a7, a1, a9, Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Lens, Tamron 70-180mm, F2.8 Di III VXD, Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6,3 GM OSS, Sony FE 1.4X teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ in ­ Texas
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,012 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 191860
Joined Mar 2014
Location: SE Texas
     
Jun 18, 2018 17:56 |  #356


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Bill being Smug (external link)
Bill's flickr (external link)
Sony a7, a1, a9, Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Lens, Tamron 70-180mm, F2.8 Di III VXD, Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6,3 GM OSS, Sony FE 1.4X teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ in ­ Texas
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,012 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 191860
Joined Mar 2014
Location: SE Texas
     
Jun 21, 2018 15:48 |  #357

Is there a thread here anywhere (I can't find one) that speaks to using an adapted Tamron or Sigma 150-600 with the RIII? I just purchased a Tammy G2 and put it on and it works great except for the noise it makes and doesn't stop without turning off the camera. I would like to read the experiences of others. Thanks


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Bill being Smug (external link)
Bill's flickr (external link)
Sony a7, a1, a9, Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Lens, Tamron 70-180mm, F2.8 Di III VXD, Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6,3 GM OSS, Sony FE 1.4X teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lame-Duck
I have indeed had pine nuts
Avatar
25,648 posts
Gallery: 1251 photos
Likes: 62545
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Fresno, California
     
Jun 23, 2018 16:23 as a reply to  @ Bill in Texas's post |  #358

On my screen Bill, I'm honestly not seeing objectionable noise. On the finch image I barely see any noise in the green area, and none on the bird...certainly not objectionable.


LD, or Mike
Often mistaken, but never in doubt.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ in ­ Texas
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,012 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 191860
Joined Mar 2014
Location: SE Texas
     
Jun 23, 2018 16:26 |  #359

Lame-Duck wrote in post #18650092 (external link)
On my screen Bill, I'm honestly not seeing objectionable noise. On the finch image I barely see any noise in the green area, and none on the bird...certainly not objectionable.

Thanks Mike. Actually I'm talking about noise from the lens or camera, not sure which. Like a motor running.


Bill being Smug (external link)
Bill's flickr (external link)
Sony a7, a1, a9, Sony Vario-Tessar T* FE 16-35mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Lens, Tamron 70-180mm, F2.8 Di III VXD, Sony FE 200-600mm f/5.6-6,3 GM OSS, Sony FE 1.4X teleconverter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lame-Duck
I have indeed had pine nuts
Avatar
25,648 posts
Gallery: 1251 photos
Likes: 62545
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Fresno, California
     
Jun 23, 2018 16:41 |  #360

Will in Tejas wrote in post #18650094 (external link)
Thanks Mike. Actually I'm talking about noise from the lens or camera, not sure which. Like a motor running.

Ahhhhhhh...sorry about that, I had it all wrong. :oops: I'm not hearing any noise from your lens :lol: and I'm sure not seeing any objectionable noise on my screen.


LD, or Mike
Often mistaken, but never in doubt.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

76,371 views & 417 likes for this thread, 68 members have posted to it and it is followed by 51 members.
Sony a7R III
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Sony Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1070 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.