Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 27 Oct 2017 (Friday) 15:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

24-70 i vs ii

 
shaunmcfd
Senior Member
Avatar
780 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Likes: 417
Joined Nov 2012
     
Oct 27, 2017 15:11 |  #1

Is it really worth the price difference? I have never shot with the version i so I am not familiar with the sharpness, CA, etc. Currently shoot with 6D but am adding 5D4 as well. Families, weddings, etc.


6D | 5D4 | 24-105 f4L | Sigma 50 2.8 Macro | 17-40 f4L| 135 f2L | 70-200 f2.8L ii | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Tamron 24-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
12,708 posts
Gallery: 1101 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 8042
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Oct 27, 2017 15:18 |  #2

Version II is better in every way, other than cost.

Depends on whether you need prime-like-sharpness at F2.8 or not.

Do you need F2.8? Have you considered the 24-70 F4L IS?

And what you do think about 3rd part, like Tamron's 24-70 F2.8 VC G2?

You can find the 24-70 F2.8 MKI for about $600ish used sometimes. Makes it very attractive. It's softer than the MKII.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,203 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Likes: 3273
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland OR USA
     
Oct 27, 2017 18:43 |  #3

What Martin said. Get the II. You won't regret it.


Sam
5D4 | 6D | 7D2 (2 bodies) | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

flickr (external link)
If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
10,016 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1742
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Gig Harbor, Washington
Post edited 7 months ago by umphotography.
     
Oct 28, 2017 09:09 |  #4

I had a very sharp copy version 1. dropped it and broke the zoom and sent it to canon and they fixed it and recalibrated to my camera. Came back even sharper and did a great job. Went all primes for 4 yrs and sold the version 1.

After 4 yrs of switching primes at wedding receptions, I had enough. So I grabbed the 24-70v2. Sold off the 35L. Started using the 24-70. Now it rarely comes off the camera. Been shooting most of the day with the 24-70 and the siggy 85 Art and I switch to the 50L when i need to.

The new 24-70 is so prime sharp. It does not do F/2.0 so I shoot just a tighter shot. Dont even miss the 35L and I love not switching glass all night long

Its a great lens and tool to have in the bag


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
33,278 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3539
Joined May 2002
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Oct 28, 2017 09:22 |  #5

I went through 4 version I lenses, and only found one that was livable, and then it developed a decentered lens and I had Canon repair it. The version II is better in every way, I would never recommend a version I with all the better options out there today, Canon or 3rd party.


Past Equipment | My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
f8andBeThere
Member
Avatar
75 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 19
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Memphis
     
Oct 28, 2017 12:36 |  #6

I've never shot with version I, but version II truly is like having a bag of primes. Sharp through its range, even at 2.8. Great resolution and color rendition. Best, most versatile lens I own for event shooting. And yep, it's pricey.


5D Mark IV, 5D Mark III, 6D, 7D, 40D, 16-35mm f2.8 II, 16-35mm f4 IS, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 24-105mm f4 IS, 50mm f1.4, 85mm f1.8, 135mm f2, 70-200mm f2.8 IS, Sigma 15mm f2.8 fisheye, Sigma 35mm f1.4A, 430 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
14,584 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 4869
Joined Sep 2007
     
Oct 28, 2017 13:41 |  #7

Shoot your Tamron at 24mm f2.8, that's how good the mkii is through the range. Shoot the Tamron at 70mm f2.8, that's how strong the mki is.


Sony A7rii/A7riii - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 28/2 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 VC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
22,754 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 296
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Oct 29, 2017 00:48 |  #8

new camera + old lens = no bueno


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400L II, sigma 15mm FE, 35mm ef-s macro, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L, gitzo GM4562, markins Q10, markins Q3, kirk, really right stuff, sirui

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MiamiBourne
Member
36 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2012
     
Nov 21, 2017 11:16 as a reply to  @ ed rader's post |  #9

I'm also thinking of the Canon 24-70 ii for my new 6d mkii. The only lens I have at the moment to use is from my 7d kit, the 28-135. I was thinking of other combinations for the money but my most used lens on my 7d was the Sigma 17-50mm and I'm thinking the 24-70 will do nicely. I guess it's better to pay up not then to waste money on other lenses and then end up paying later.


Canon 6D Mkii || Sigma 35mm F1.4 Art || Canon Speedlite 430 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Title Fairy still hasn't visited me!
3,226 posts
Likes: 357
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Nov 21, 2017 11:46 as a reply to  @ MiamiBourne's post |  #10

There's also black Friday deals on Canon lenses right now.


Canon 5D mk III , 7D mk II
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kmilo
Senior Member
Avatar
252 posts
Likes: 243
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Albany, NY
     
Nov 21, 2017 11:51 |  #11

I had the version I years ago. It was extremely sharp ... most impressive lens I've ever owned. I just didn't like the reverse zoom (extended out for wide angle) and the weight (... plenty of people have given me a hard time for saying this, but that doesn't make it any less true.) :)


Kris
Insulting critiques always welcomed. flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WA ­ Tiger
Senior Member
653 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2010
     
Nov 29, 2017 09:01 |  #12

If you were buying the 5D Mark IV in a kit, would people buy the kit with the 24-70 II or the 24-105 II?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kmilo
Senior Member
Avatar
252 posts
Likes: 243
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Albany, NY
     
Nov 29, 2017 09:14 |  #13

I think wedding photographers need the speed over the range, but non-wedding photographers would usually choose the added range over the speed.

WA Tiger wrote in post #18506571 (external link)
If you were buying the 5D Mark IV in a kit, would people buy the kit with the 24-70 II or the 24-105 II?


Kris
Insulting critiques always welcomed. flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
9,400 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1248
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Post edited 6 months ago by joeseph.
     
Nov 30, 2017 02:39 |  #14

I don't (usually) shoot weddings, but I'd choose a 2.8 over anything else with smaller aperture purely on ability in low light situations rather than zoom range.


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", 1D MK II converted for IR, and now an M5
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
22,754 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 296
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Nov 30, 2017 14:36 as a reply to  @ kmilo's post |  #15

I don't think that's a fair statement. the choice is between IQ and convenience.


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400L II, sigma 15mm FE, 35mm ef-s macro, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L, gitzo GM4562, markins Q10, markins Q3, kirk, really right stuff, sirui

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

7,844 views & 10 likes for this thread
24-70 i vs ii
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is aperture20
772 guests, 396 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.