Couple of my girls from yesterday. Would love feedback.
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
Oct 30, 2017 15:19 | #1 Couple of my girls from yesterday. Would love feedback. Image hosted by forum (883405) © Shaun Liddy [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (883406) © Shaun Liddy [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jethr0 Goldmember More info | Oct 30, 2017 15:21 | #2 I really like #2. www.jefflowe.ca
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 31, 2017 02:22 | #3 I agree on the DOF being a bit thin causing some OOF on the back side of Yvonne pic #1. Still trying to learn the balance. Moving from a 7d2 to the 5d3 seemed to change this a bit.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
There are good dof calculators out there. I see it like this - margin up and down you can go f2 (if you have it) - tight full frame f2.8, half body f/4... I like the longer focal lenghts for people unless you need them to look tall (fashion), than you can use 50mm or even les coser at up angle and the natural distortion will make person look taller www.jjconstantine.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JJConstantine Member More info Post edited over 5 years ago by JJConstantine. | Nov 01, 2017 02:11 | #5 Definitely 2, but may i ask why iso 400? Always try iso closest to your optimum to get better dr, if you want to add a bit grain is better to add it in a post a bit - but that's just my suggestion. www.jjconstantine.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
texkam "Just let me be a stupid photographer." 1,579 posts Likes: 993 Joined Mar 2012 Location: Olympia, Washington USA More info | Nov 01, 2017 06:54 | #6 ^^^ Agree about the iso. You had the ability to shoot these at a lower iso. Why do you need a 1/2000, 1/1000th shutter speed?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Nov 01, 2017 09:17 | #7 texkam wrote in post #18486035 ^^^ Agree about the iso. You had the ability to shoot these at a lower iso. Why do you need a 1/2000, 1/1000th shutter speed? I'm guessing that you used f/3.2 to limit the DOF, but you didn't need ISO 400/320 for that. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info Post edited over 5 years ago by TeamSpeed. (3 edits in all) | Nov 01, 2017 10:07 | #8 I wouldn't worry at all about the ISO. The 5D3 has almost the same DR value up through ISO 800 (1/2 stop difference between 100 and 800), so as long as you stay under 800, you are fine. If you have to pull shadows up, there is more than enough DR there for that. The 5D3 doesn't have much noise at all at these levels too, and are very EASILY cleaned up if there are some. At this point I would be more concerned with AF, points, AF setup, shutter speed, and DOF/aperture, as you continue to learn. Those have a much larger impact on your results at this point. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Nov 01, 2017 10:38 | #9 TeamSpeed wrote in post #18486151 I wouldn't worry at all about the ISO. The 5D3 has almost the same DR value up through ISO 800 (1/2 stop difference between 100 and 800), so as long as you stay under 800, you are fine. I wasn't worried about the ISO 400/320 in themselves, but by the fact that he's still letting the camera make choices for him in static situations where he could start taking control using the dreaded Manual setting. ; ) FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Nov 01, 2017 11:20 | #10 Unfortunately the 5D3 doesn't have a great auto ISO in manual like the newer bodies. It has it, but you cannot set exposure compensation. This way, you could shoot in manual for the 2 factors you really care about, and let the ISO float to the lowest value for you under the covers. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 02, 2017 17:12 | #11 99% of my shooting is in M.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 03, 2017 00:58 | #12 This is becoming an interesting exercise for me. This shows 2' DOF based on F/Stop with Focal length and required distance of subject to obtain the 2' DOF. I am working on more charts like this for myself. Obviously need to populate some cells still. Image hosted by forum (883915) © Shaun Liddy [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 04, 2017 23:48 | #13 PhotosGuy,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ShaunLiddy THREAD STARTER Senior Member More info Post edited over 5 years ago by Shaun Liddy. (2 edits in all) | Nov 05, 2017 00:01 | #14 Teamspeed,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinmunoz Cream of the Crop More info | Nov 05, 2017 01:53 | #15 TeamSpeed wrote in post #18486202 Unfortunately the 5D3 doesn't have a great auto ISO in manual like the newer bodies. It has it, but you cannot set exposure compensation. This way, you could shoot in manual for the 2 factors you really care about, and let the ISO float to the lowest value for you under the covers. Press the ISO button and turn the wheel on the back. it gonna act like EC. | SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1560 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||