tadams17 wrote in post #18490415
I looked at the 18" so do I need just that or something to shoot through to soften the light?
You can put a sock on it, if you want. I wouldn't though.
When shooting outdoors, you have two common options:
1) Big modifier, close to subject, to get the softest light you can. This is hard without an assistant and you're at the mercy of the wind.
2) Smaller modifier, close to subject, harder light, but if you expose the output as fill light, it will be soft enough to not be disruptive. You can take on the wind no problem.
The 18" reflector is going to be softer than the bare bulb will be, because it's a larger apparent source of light relative to the subjects. And if you get it closer to them, it will be softer still. But, it will not provide the soft light that a 7 foot parabolic would. But, using a 7 foot parabolic outdoors without help with any wind at all is an exercise in suffering. My 60" umbrellas have turned from wind gusts. Some have went down. Even with weights and anchors. It's just a lot of surface area. So I use reflectors these days and I expose them as fill or near-key.
+++++++++++++++
Here's an example of a 10 inch reflector without any sock or anything. It's at close proximity to the subject. It's considered "hard light" but because it's 10" and closer to the subject, it's soft enough to not show big obvious spectral highlights:

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/UpxmiT
IMG_5887
by
Martin Wise
, on Flickr
+++++++++++++++
Here's an example of a 47" brolly box (umbrella style softbox), at close range to subjects, with the sun behind them and in the composition. The huge surface area, at close range, is a big apparent light source relative to the subjects, so the light wraps around them, fills shadows, and exposes their skin and it appears very soft. This worked because I was under tree canopy with minimal wind.
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/JnoPqZ
IMG_4016mark
by
Martin Wise
, on Flickr
Very best,