Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 11 Nov 2017 (Saturday) 21:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

50 mm f/1.2 love/hate

 
KatManDEW
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 603
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Nov 11, 2017 21:28 |  #1

I'm on my second Canon 50mm. Both have required ~-20 MFA on three different 5D bodies. But I like how it worked for this photo, with -19 MFA.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2017/11/2/LQ_885462.jpg
Image hosted by forum (885462) © KatManDEW [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FTb
Senior Member
754 posts
Gallery: 61 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 5448
Joined Jun 2014
     
Nov 11, 2017 23:53 |  #2

Hmmm, are you sure? Looks to me like you are focused in front of her. Hard to tell exactly but the camera in front of her seems pretty sharp and looking at the flags on the side of the barrel it seems the ones roughly in the same plane as the camera lens are also in focus.

Since you're shooting pointed slightly down, the plane of focus would be tilted back a bit from purely vertical towards her. But I'd be willing to bet she is at the back of your focus plane and maybe slightly out of it.

I've got the same lens and love it, but mine doesn't require any mfa.


My flickr (external link)
Favorite lenses: Canon 200mm f2, RF50/1.2L, RF85/1.2L II,TS-E 17mm f/4L, RF 24-105, RF 35mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KatManDEW
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 603
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Nov 13, 2017 19:04 |  #3

FTb wrote in post #18494415 (external link)
Hmmm, are you sure? Looks to me like you are focused in front of her. Hard to tell exactly but the camera in front of her seems pretty sharp and looking at the flags on the side of the barrel it seems the ones roughly in the same plane as the camera lens are also in focus.

Since you're shooting pointed slightly down, the plane of focus would be tilted back a bit from purely vertical towards her. But I'd be willing to bet she is at the back of your focus plane and maybe slightly out of it.

I've got the same lens and love it, but mine doesn't require any mfa.

I see what you are saying. I took several comparison photos with -19 and 0 MFA and I am going to inspect them.

I will also check to see if I kept my MFA test shots withmy focus rig, and maybe post them here.

Thanks for the feedback!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FTb
Senior Member
754 posts
Gallery: 61 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 5448
Joined Jun 2014
Post edited over 6 years ago by FTb. (3 edits in all)
     
Nov 13, 2017 19:14 as a reply to  @ KatManDEW's post |  #4

I've found a couple of things that work for me to adjust mfa. I ALWAYS use a tripod to eliminate camera shake as a variable.

First, I try to find a large flat concrete slab. In my case my back patio works well. Then I point the camera down at roughly a 45 degree angle. Focus on some object like an acorn or leaf or even a coin at a normal shooting distance. Since I take a lot of portraits, this distance will usually be 6 to 12 feet from the camera. After i take a couple of shots I pump up the contrast and sharpness quite a bit. This will give me a very clear line of focus running from the left side of the image to the right which is very easy to see because the small particles of sand and stuff in the concrete come into sharp focus. If mfa is correct it should run right through the object.

After I've done that, I then check far focus by focusing on some object at effective infinity -- possibly a telephone pole or sign a hundred yards or more away from the camera.

Then after those test come back well, I'll just photograph things around the back yard to confirm I'm in the ballpark.

Good luck.


ps, if you shoot tethered, you can see instantly a much larger and more accurate image than on the camera screen, and you can make mfa adjustments quickly.


My flickr (external link)
Favorite lenses: Canon 200mm f2, RF50/1.2L, RF85/1.2L II,TS-E 17mm f/4L, RF 24-105, RF 35mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Out buying Wheaties
Avatar
7,484 posts
Gallery: 64 photos
Likes: 1087
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Canada, Ontario, Milton
     
Nov 13, 2017 21:22 |  #5

I gave up with 50L on 5D MKII and MFA. It was spot on with 5Dc.


M-E and ME blog (external link). Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artsf
Senior Member
400 posts
Gallery: 73 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 395
Joined Sep 2015
     
Nov 13, 2017 23:55 |  #6

DPAF works great with 50L and very accurate.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LF911SC
Member
Avatar
174 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 530
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Boca Raton, FL USA
     
Nov 15, 2017 02:01 |  #7

Nice


You don't take a photograph, you make it...Ansel Adams
Nikon Z 7, Nikon D850, Nikkor 24-70 f/2.8, Tokina AT-X Pro FX 16-28 f/2.8, Nikkor 105 f/2.8 Micro, Nikkor 300 f/4D IF-ED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ah-keong
Goldmember
Avatar
1,297 posts
Gallery: 132 photos
Likes: 2660
Joined Apr 2016
     
Nov 15, 2017 03:09 |  #8

f/1,2L is difficult to do the focus and recompose.
but nailing it would be buttery....

 :p


Canon R3 | RP | 7D2+grip | EF 70-200mm f/2,8L IS II | EF 135mm f/2L | EF 50mm f/1,2L | RF 100mm f/2,8L | Tamron 24-70mm f/2,8 VC G2 | Tamron 17-35mm f/2,8-4 Di OSD | ZE 2/100mm | ZF 2/35mm | ZF 1,4/85mm | ZF 2/135mm | CV 1,4/58mm Nokton | Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2,8D | DC-Nikkor 105mm f/2D | Micro-Nikkor 200mm f/4D |
Speedlite 430EX III-RT | 600EX-RT |
Manfrotto BeFree Travel | MT055XPRO3 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
K ­ Soze
Goldmember
Avatar
2,101 posts
Gallery: 89 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 5628
Joined Dec 2011
     
Nov 15, 2017 07:44 |  #9

I had to use focus compensation on my camera bodies. But I never had a problem missing focus with the 50 1.2 in fact it is my go to over the 85mm f1.2 when the subject is likely to move and I want a shallow DoF. I go to the 50 because it focusses faster than the 85.


I try to make art by pushing buttons

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,600 views & 5 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
50 mm f/1.2 love/hate
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1431 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.