Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
Thread started 17 Nov 2017 (Friday) 16:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

7D blurry through viewfinder, but picture turns out good

 
amasquelier
Member
37 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2010
     
Nov 17, 2017 16:43 |  #1

So i recently purchased a 7D from B&H's used department with a new Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16 F2.8,
well today has been my first day to play with it, and I have noticed that looking down the camera through the lens, it seems blurry..
it wont auto focus correctly even though you can hear it focusing.. Well, after taking the picture and looking at it (I have the settings to HOLD so I can view them) the image is clear and in focus, nothings wrong with it.

any ideas?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
DunnoWhen
Goldmember
Avatar
1,748 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2006
Location: South Wales
Post edited 7 months ago by DunnoWhen.
     
Nov 17, 2017 16:47 |  #2

On the top of the camera, Next to the viewfinder, there is a little dial which can be used to modify the viewfinder focus for each user. See if that has any effect.


My wisdom is learned from the experience of others.
...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amasquelier
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
37 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2010
     
Nov 17, 2017 16:51 |  #3

You know what... i'm a retard.

It was so simple that I overlooked it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HodjPodj
Member
55 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Sep 2017
Location: Denver/USA
     
Nov 17, 2017 16:56 |  #4

Oh man, I was so excited to see this thread as I am very new to all of this but actually had an answer. Too late I guess!! :(


Old Town Photo
Gear: Canon 6D, Canon T2i (Self modded, LPF2 removed/replaced with Baader IR Cut Filter for Astro), Canon EF 100mm f/2, Rokinon 24mm f/1.4 for Canon, Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 for Canon, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM, Gitzo GT1532 Mountaineer tripod w/Gitzo GH1382QD Ballhead.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amasquelier
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
37 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2010
     
Nov 17, 2017 16:58 |  #5

Hey, never know, someone else might new more advice!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HodjPodj
Member
55 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Sep 2017
Location: Denver/USA
     
Nov 17, 2017 17:16 |  #6

For sure, though that will more than likely not be me for a while as I am still getting used to the photography language. Unless you don't know what the little button next to the lens does, I just figured that out a few days ago. Hahaha


Old Town Photo
Gear: Canon 6D, Canon T2i (Self modded, LPF2 removed/replaced with Baader IR Cut Filter for Astro), Canon EF 100mm f/2, Rokinon 24mm f/1.4 for Canon, Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 for Canon, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM, Gitzo GT1532 Mountaineer tripod w/Gitzo GH1382QD Ballhead.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jotto123
Member
110 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2012
     
Nov 17, 2017 19:30 |  #7

A few months after my first dslr I became curious about the dial. It made a difference lol


6d - 135L - 85mm 1.8 - 50mm 1.8 - 35Art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jarvis ­ Creative ­ Studios
Goldmember
Avatar
2,338 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 701
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Houston, Texas
     
Nov 17, 2017 19:35 |  #8

Sometimes my friends (who wear seriously thick glasses) ask me to take photos of them with their cameras, and I feel really dumb because I don't think I can get them to focus, but in reality their diopter is just way off of what I'm used to.


WEBSITE (external link)
flickr (external link)
Sony HX90V || Sony RX100V || Sony a6500 || Sony a9 || Sony E 10-18mm f/4 OSS || Sony FE 24-70 f/2.8 GM || Sony Sonnar T* FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA || Sony Sonnar T* FE 55mm f1.8 ZA || Sony FE 70-200 f/2.8 GM OSS || Godox speedlights and strobes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
4,961 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 1250
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Nov 17, 2017 22:14 |  #9

I can go one better. After having made this same mistake a couple of times I was again faced with an out of focus view through the view finder. Repeated adjustments of the diopter failed to fix the issue. 5 minutes of looking through menu options in puzzlement and I finally realised the problem was that I was wearing my reading glasses.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nqjudo
Goldmember
Avatar
2,845 posts
Likes: 812
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Canada
     
Nov 17, 2017 22:42 |  #10

Maybe you guys can offer me some insight. For the past few years I've noticed that my minimum close focus distance is moving further and further away but I don't need or wear glasses. The issue is that I'm really only relying on my AF confirmation to tell me I've got focus. I can't see clearly in the viewfinder. It is kind of fuzzy and I cannot correct it with the diopter. Is there some accessory that I can use or do I have to see an optometrist about getting glasses to use when I shoot?


No photographer is as good as the simplest camera. - Edward Steichen.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
teekay
Goldmember
Avatar
2,876 posts
Likes: 466
Joined Apr 2001
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Post edited 7 months ago by teekay.
     
Nov 17, 2017 23:43 |  #11

nqjudo wrote in post #18498917 (external link)
.... I've noticed that my minimum close focus distance is moving further and further away but I don't need or wear glasses.....I can't see clearly in the viewfinder. It is kind of fuzzy and I cannot correct it with the diopter....do I have to see an optometrist about getting glasses to use when I shoot?

Sorry, but you have to face it - from what you describe you clearly need glasses. Join the crowd.;-)a




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nogo
I could have been worse....
6,736 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 465
Joined Dec 2013
Location: All Along the Natchez Trace (Clinton, MS)
     
Nov 18, 2017 00:14 |  #12

nqjudo wrote in post #18498917 (external link)
Maybe you guys can offer me some insight. For the past few years I've noticed that my minimum close focus distance is moving further and further away but I don't need or wear glasses. The issue is that I'm really only relying on my AF confirmation to tell me I've got focus. I can't see clearly in the viewfinder. It is kind of fuzzy and I cannot correct it with the diopter. Is there some accessory that I can use or do I have to see an optometrist about getting glasses to use when I shoot?

No need to go to an eye doctor to check out your vision. Just go to a drug store or a big box store. Usually around the drug section they have a reading glasses section. Try on different strengths of reading glasses. You may realize you are more blind that you thought you were if you find a pair that really works for you. :lol:


Philip
Does the TF actually know about the soda cans and PVC pipe from 30 years ago?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tixeon
Goldmember
Avatar
1,245 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 13
Joined Oct 2004
Location: 44657
     
Nov 18, 2017 10:45 |  #13

nqjudo wrote in post #18498917 (external link)
Maybe you guys can offer me some insight. For the past few years I've noticed that my minimum close focus distance is moving further and further away but I don't need or wear glasses. The issue is that I'm really only relying on my AF confirmation to tell me I've got focus. I can't see clearly in the viewfinder. It is kind of fuzzy and I cannot correct it with the diopter. Is there some accessory that I can use or do I have to see an optometrist about getting glasses to use when I shoot?


Check out Diopter Correction Eyepiece Lens that snaps into the viewfinder eyepiece. Canon makes them in + & - strengths. I assume Nikon does too.


Tim
______
Any cat owner will tell you -- no one really owns a cat...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
Spiderwoman
Avatar
16,799 posts
Gallery: 70 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3843
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Nov 18, 2017 13:21 |  #14

nqjudo wrote in post #18498917 (external link)
For the past few years I've noticed that my minimum close focus distance is moving further and further away but I don't need or wear glasses.

The condition is called presbyopia. People usually feel motivated to get it corrected when reading becomes too awkward. You should go to an optometrist once in a while anyway. Needing bifocals or reading glasses isn't the only reason to get one's eyes checked.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.), shoo-in | IMAGE EDITING OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nqjudo
Goldmember
Avatar
2,845 posts
Likes: 812
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Canada
Post edited 7 months ago by nqjudo.
     
Nov 18, 2017 15:06 |  #15

OhLook wrote in post #18499203 (external link)
The condition is called presbyopia. People usually feel motivated to get it corrected when reading becomes too awkward. You should go to an optometrist once in a while anyway. Needing bifocals or reading glasses isn't the only reason to get one's eyes checked.

Indeed. I go to the optometrist every 2-3 years as he recommends. My vision is better than 20/20 and my tissues show no degeneration. Like yourself, my MD recommended those pharmacy reading glasses if/when reading becomes difficult. That isn’t the case yet. I can still read small print very well - further and further away in recent years but not uncomfortably so. I tried the reading glasses but they don’t seem to work well with the viewfinder. I’m not sure but it seems that those glasses are optimized for viewing further than directly in front of the eye. Is that possible? It seems like you might have some expertise to share. If that’s the case what would you recommend? The diopter correction eyepiece recommended above seems worth looking into.


No photographer is as good as the simplest camera. - Edward Steichen.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

4,741 views & 7 likes for this thread
7D blurry through viewfinder, but picture turns out good
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Barryvg
826 guests, 398 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.