Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 22 Nov 2017 (Wednesday) 18:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Printer differences

 
KatManDEW
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 603
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Nov 22, 2017 18:36 |  #1

I have the Canon Pro 100 and IPf6300. I realize they are different classes of printer. One being 8 color dye ink, and the other being 12 color pigmented ink.

I use a calibrated NEC PA301wsv monitor. Prints on the IPf6300 look very close to what they look like on my monitor. Prints on the Pro 100 are always darker and more saturated.

I've tried soft proofing many times over the years and it just looks nothing like prints on either printer. I use the paper and profiles for the printer and paper I am using.

I'm sure that to get the best prints I should be processing images specifically for the printer being used. But since soft proofing doesn't seem to represent what prints look like, that makes it difficult. For the most part, prints on the IPf6300 match my monitor well enough that soft proofing is not necessary. But prints on the Pro 100 are a crap shoot.

Anyone have any thoughts or suggestions?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,635 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2058
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Nov 23, 2017 01:17 |  #2

Soft proofing has nothing much to do with printing. What it shows is how an image will looks on your monitor when converted to a particular colour space.

How prints turn out is governed by the type/quality of the printer (different numbers/quality of inks) and differing ink types (dye vs pigment) as well as the accuracy of the printer profile. While OEM profiles are generally quite good these days you may find that you get better results if you use a custom produced profile for the Pro 100. Even so, I think it is generally accepted that dye vs pigment will always produce different results.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KatManDEW
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 603
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Nov 23, 2017 05:50 |  #3

Dan Marchant wrote in post #18502470 (external link)
Soft proofing has nothing much to do with printing. What it shows is how an image will looks on your monitor when converted to a particular colour space.

How prints turn out is governed by the type/quality of the printer (different numbers/quality of inks) and differing ink types (dye vs pigment) as well as the accuracy of the printer profile. While OEM profiles are generally quite good these days you may find that you get better results if you use a custom produced profile for the Pro 100. Even so, I think it is generally accepted that dye vs pigment will always produce different results.

Thank you. I should get custom profiles, especially for the Pro 100.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KatManDEW
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
696 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 603
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Nov 24, 2017 07:54 |  #4

Dan Marchant wrote in post #18502470 (external link)
Soft proofing has nothing much to do with printing. What it shows is how an image will looks on your monitor when converted to a particular colour space.

How prints turn out is governed by the type/quality of the printer (different numbers/quality of inks) and differing ink types (dye vs pigment) as well as the accuracy of the printer profile. While OEM profiles are generally quite good these days you may find that you get better results if you use a custom produced profile for the Pro 100. Even so, I think it is generally accepted that dye vs pigment will always produce different results.

Any recommendation on a printer profiling service?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,097 views & 1 like for this thread, 2 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Printer differences
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1431 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.