Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk 
Thread started 14 Dec 2017 (Thursday) 17:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Another "Which Lens" question canon 70-200f2.8 or 100-400

 
shady954
Member
35 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2017
     
Dec 14, 2017 17:42 |  #1

I've been waiting for either of these lenses to go on special before I make the leap and as of yesterday they're both at 10% off so I'm heading down to my local store to buy one...Still cant decide which one though.

I have the Canon 600D with the twin kit lenses and spent the majority of this year taking photos of my boys playing Rugby using the 55-250mm kit lens which performed admirably most of the time. Next year my eldest moves to a full field while my youngest still plays on the half field for another year.

I've borrowed a 100-400 (series 1) from a friend and really noticed the weight (I'll get over it) but definitely missed the 55mm-100mm focal length. I didn't notice a huge amount of difference in the photos between the 100-400 and the kit lens but didn't pay much attention to the "keeper rate".

I've asked around, trolled the internet, read the reviews and still none the wiser. I had originally planned on the 100-400 but have been swung towards the 70-200.

I've looked through the Rugby thread here https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1418607 and noticed quite a lot of people using the 70-200f2.8, a few using the 300mm f2.8 and some using the 100-400.

I also checked through the hundreds of rugby photos I took this year to see what focal length they were....some days I would have used under 100mm 5% of the time some days it may have been up to 15% of the time. I would have the same percentages at 250mm focal length also. Add to this that both my boys were playing on the half field this year and I assume that as they progress to the full field I would use under 100mm focal length less.

Can anyone help, I know it's a very subjective question and I'll be happy with either lens and at the same time also wish I bough the other one!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
pat.kane
Senior Member
Avatar
598 posts
Likes: 113
Joined May 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
     
Dec 14, 2017 20:36 |  #2

Very subjective indeed. You can't really go wrong with either lens.

The old 100-400 just doesn't compare to the newest version. I owned it and now have the II version. I also own the 70-200 II.

If my only consideration was rugby in good light, I would not hesitate to purchase the 100-400 II. I like the 100-400 so much, I take it as my primary lens if I'm shooting daylight baseball and lacrosse. I also own the 400/2.8L IS II, so that should give you an idea how good the latest version of the 100-400 is if I'm willing to leave a $10K lens at home and to use a $2K one instead.

The advantage of the 70-200 is its versatility (an all-around workhorse) and being one stop faster, which is huge for low light experienced with evening and night games.


1Dx, 5D3 and some L glass (gear list / feedback)
http://MaxPreps.DMVpix​.com (external link)
http://www.DMVpix.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shady954
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
35 posts
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2017
Post edited 6 months ago by shady954. (4 edits in all)
     
Dec 14, 2017 22:05 as a reply to  @ pat.kane's post |  #3

Thanks for the help....I'm pleased with your response as I've just bought the 100-400.
I wasnt going to procrastinate on it, it was a great price and I know they will sell quickly a week out from Christmas.
Mostly they're advertised in Australia at $2800 or $2900 (not grey import) but you dont have to look very hard to find it for $2650 or there abouts...Just bought it for $2339 plus Canon have a $150 cash back on on top so $2189 is what I got it for ߘ.
Very pleased with the price hopefully I'll be pleased with the Lens

Thanks again




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phoenixkh
a mere speck
6,666 posts
Gallery: 61 photos
Likes: 1227
Joined May 2011
Location: Gainesville, Florida
     
Dec 15, 2017 00:33 |  #4

Congrats on your new lens. I also have both but use the 100-400Lii a lot more than the 70-200 because I do a lot of bird photographs. I bought the 70-200 for people instead of wildlife. It's great for that.


Kim (the male variety) Canon 1DX2 | 1D IV | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS | 100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
RRS tripod and monopod | 580EXII | Cinch 1 & Loop 3 Special Edition | Editing Encouraged

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rdalrt
Goldmember
Avatar
1,638 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 482
Joined Aug 2008
Location: The Great White North
     
Dec 15, 2017 19:02 |  #5

Daytime rugby, the 100-400 II will work a treat. Superb lens. Enjoy!


Just Sports Photographyexternal link
My Junk ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
18,188 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Likes: 1295
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Dec 15, 2017 19:57 |  #6

With some very limited shooting time around the field, I've definitely preferred my 100-400 vs the 70-200, simply because the action moves one end to the other faster than I do; so, I appreicate being able to get the far action without having to get up/down the pitch the same way the players do. I found a combo of the 24-105 and 100-400 worked better to frame the shots I was attempting than the 70-200, which was frequently too long or too short.

Congrats on the new lens; just be sure to keep an eye on the ISO; it needs a lot of light to keep your shutter up where you need it at the longer focal lengths.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (7D MkII/5D IV, Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,312 views & 4 likes for this thread
Another "Which Lens" question canon 70-200f2.8 or 100-400
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is jeroe
862 guests, 373 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.