Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 18 Mar 2006 (Saturday) 20:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is the canon EF-S 17-85mm good for portraits

 
Dragos ­ Jianu
Goldmember
1,768 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2005
     
Mar 19, 2006 23:52 as a reply to  @ post 1307758 |  #16

The "blind" term doesn't make sense to me at all.

I am referring to the amount of light it needs. It's useless even outside on a cloudy weather if you want to capture action. Indoors it is useless without a flash, even with IS if you want to shot humans. Hell it needs 8 times to amount of light an f/2 would and 16 times more light then a 1.4, not to mention the sweet shallow DoF.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Mar 20, 2006 00:05 |  #17

Oh sweet jebus...

You don't need a fast lens to study portraiture. Any fool can take a fast lens and shoot it wide open. Whooo-peee! Now if we're lucky, one eye will be in focus. ;)

Portraiture is about light and how it changes the subject. You can shoot wonderful portraits at f/8


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Mar 20, 2006 00:05 as a reply to  @ Dragos Jianu's post |  #18

Dragos Jianu wrote:
I am referring to the amount of light it needs. It's useless even outside on a cloudy weather if you want to capture action. Indoors it is useless without a flash, even with IS if you want to shot humans. Hell it needs 8 times to amount of light an f/2 would and 16 times more light then a 1.4, not to mention the sweet shallow DoF.

It's called slow - not blind. Slow lens.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dragos ­ Jianu
Goldmember
1,768 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2005
     
Mar 20, 2006 00:29 as a reply to  @ DocFrankenstein's post |  #19

For me a slow lens would be f/2.8-4. At f/5.6 i consider it blind.

Is having just one eye in focus bad? Show me some of your portraits please so i can understand. i am a portrait noob.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=149144

http://www.photo.net/p​hotos/Dragos Jianu (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Mar 20, 2006 00:56 as a reply to  @ Dragos Jianu's post |  #20

Dragos Jianu wrote:
Is having just one eye in focus bad?

Who said it's bad?

Show me some of your portraits please so i can understand.

What do you want to understand exactly?


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Mar 20, 2006 07:14 as a reply to  @ Dragos Jianu's post |  #21

Dragos Jianu wrote:
I am referring to the amount of light it needs. It's useless even outside on a cloudy weather if you want to capture action. Indoors it is useless without a flash, even with IS if you want to shot humans. Hell it needs 8 times to amount of light an f/2 would and 16 times more light then a 1.4, not to mention the sweet shallow DoF.

Dragos Jianu wrote:
For me a slow lens would be f/2.8-4. At f/5.6 i consider it blind.

Is having just one eye in focus bad? Show me some of your portraits please so i can understand. i am a portrait noob.

It sounds to me as though you are either stuck on the idea of using very high shutter speeds all the time or the idea of having a very short depth of field for all your work. Either of these ideas, if they are how you feel, would have the effect of limiting your photographic skills. You need to be able to use a camera over its total range from time to time to produce different kinds of work.

I shoot a lot of my work at apertures of f/5.6 to f/16. Sometimes I will open my lenses up to max aperture, but not very often. The specific reasons for doing so would be either trying to minimize the depth of field for a particular shot or possibly to obtain a faster shutter speed in a very low light situation.

I would not want, in general, to have depth of field so short in a portrait shot that only one eye is sharply in focus. I doubt that most portrait clients would like that either. Blurring the background is one thing, but keeping your primary subject suitably sharp is also usually quite important.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,296 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Is the canon EF-S 17-85mm good for portraits
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1889 guests, 105 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.