Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 13 Jan 2018 (Saturday) 22:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Critique Lighting

 
icor1031
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 307
Joined Jan 2015
Post edited over 5 years ago by icor1031. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 13, 2018 22:21 |  #1

Minus the mild lens flare (I like it in this one), how can I improve my lighting?

Please comment on lighting, not the pose.

Thanks!

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2018/01/2/LQ_895049.jpg
Image hosted by forum (895049) © icor1031 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 5Ds || Zeiss Sonnar 135/2 || Zeiss Otus 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 50/1.4 || Tamron SP 35/1.4
Ideal Portraits (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
icor1031
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 307
Joined Jan 2015
     
Jan 14, 2018 12:50 |  #2

Nothing?... -?


Canon 5Ds || Zeiss Sonnar 135/2 || Zeiss Otus 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 50/1.4 || Tamron SP 35/1.4
Ideal Portraits (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,666 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 694
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Jan 14, 2018 13:28 |  #3

What don't you like about the lighting? It looks fine to me. If you wanted more of a dramatic look you can always lose the modifier on the key light and go with a hard light.


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
icor1031
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 307
Joined Jan 2015
     
Jan 14, 2018 14:37 |  #4

jcolman wrote in post #18540743 (external link)
What don't you like about the lighting? It looks fine to me. If you wanted more of a dramatic look you can always lose the modifier on the key light and go with a hard light.

I didn't say it's bad, but there's usually room for improvement.


Canon 5Ds || Zeiss Sonnar 135/2 || Zeiss Otus 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 50/1.4 || Tamron SP 35/1.4
Ideal Portraits (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,666 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 694
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Jan 14, 2018 14:44 |  #5

icor1031 wrote in post #18540789 (external link)
I didn't say it's bad, but there's usually room for improvement.

Well it all depends on what you wanted the final result to look like. If this "look" is what you wanted, you nailed it. If you want to try something different, next time go with a smaller modifier on your key light and see if you like the results.


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
icor1031
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 307
Joined Jan 2015
Post edited over 5 years ago by icor1031. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 14, 2018 15:21 |  #6

jcolman wrote in post #18540794 (external link)
Well it all depends on what you wanted the final result to look like. If this "look" is what you wanted, you nailed it. If you want to try something different, next time go with a smaller modifier on your key light and see if you like the results.

Mostly I wondered if anyone would tell me to move my hair light, modify my kicker, add another light somewhere, etc.

------

I've been using a 4ft shoot-through umbrella, but this one is basically a 6ft softbox.
I'm torn on which I like more, for head shots. I imagine most clients would prefer this one, and this one is easier to work with.


Canon 5Ds || Zeiss Sonnar 135/2 || Zeiss Otus 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 50/1.4 || Tamron SP 35/1.4
Ideal Portraits (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ramon-uk
Senior Member
831 posts
Gallery: 61 photos
Likes: 365
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Rochester UK
     
Jan 15, 2018 04:02 |  #7

I think the overall lighting is excellent, the only thing I would find fault with is the shiny highlights on her fingers.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Out buying Wheaties
Avatar
7,474 posts
Gallery: 63 photos
Likes: 1078
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Canada, Ontario, Milton
     
Jan 17, 2018 17:56 |  #8

I like impressive statement in the watermark. Due to this I don't feel confident to say anything not overwhelmly positive about this picture.


M-E and ME blog (external link). Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Jan 17, 2018 19:19 |  #9

Ramon-uk wrote in post #18541193 (external link)
...the only thing I would find fault with is the shiny highlights on her fingers.

Really the only critique I could see as well; overall, the lighting is quite well done with a pleasing result.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
s1a1om
Senior Member
Avatar
515 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 501
Joined Jul 2013
Location: Hartford, CT, USA
     
Jan 17, 2018 19:37 |  #10

Nice photo. I really like the lighting.


Constructive criticism is always appreciated.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cham_001
Senior Member
Avatar
880 posts
Likes: 58
Joined Feb 2009
Location: based between Ruse, Bulgaria & Recife-Brazil
     
Jan 19, 2018 10:29 |  #11

icor1031 wrote in post #18540420 (external link)
Minus the mild lens flare (I like it in this one), how can I improve my lighting?

Please comment on lighting, not the pose.

Thanks!
Hosted photo: posted by icor1031 in
./showthread.php?p=185​40420&i=i256914989
forum: Critique Corner

Overall the lighting looks really good. The colours look clean and natural.

Personal Opinion here:
I would have placed the hair light pointing downwards and diagonally from above towards HER left shoulder(with a snoot & grid) just to get the richness from her natural hair colour.
I would turn the background light fractionally down 1/3 or 1/2 stop. And, I would direct this same light more towards the background to reduce the highlights.
Your model has tremendous hair that I would prefer to see more of and clearly.
(In a nutshell: I would have swapped the lighting emphasis from the rear of her hair/head and more to the front)


"... with a clear perspective - the confusion is clearer ..."
Body: < changing >
Lenses: 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM
Flashguns: 580ex II x 4, MT24 macro flash
Accessories: Pkt Wiz TT5 x 5, AC3 x 2, MiniTT1 x 2, Sekonic L-758DR
Studio Lights: Godox ADpro x 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
icor1031
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,129 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 307
Joined Jan 2015
Post edited over 5 years ago by icor1031.
     
Jan 22, 2018 08:01 |  #12

Cham_001 wrote in post #18544406 (external link)
Overall the lighting looks really good. The colours look clean and natural.

Personal Opinion here:
I would have placed the hair light pointing downwards and diagonally from above towards HER left shoulder(with a snoot & grid) just to get the richness from her natural hair colour.
I would turn the background light fractionally down 1/3 or 1/2 stop. And, I would direct this same light more towards the background to reduce the highlights.
Your model has tremendous hair that I would prefer to see more of and clearly.
(In a nutshell: I would have swapped the lighting emphasis from the rear of her hair/head and more to the front)

Direct the background light more toward the background?...

Also, you're saying to place the hair light in front of her, instead of behind?


Canon 5Ds || Zeiss Sonnar 135/2 || Zeiss Otus 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 85/1.4 || Sigma ART 50/1.4 || Tamron SP 35/1.4
Ideal Portraits (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cham_001
Senior Member
Avatar
880 posts
Likes: 58
Joined Feb 2009
Location: based between Ruse, Bulgaria & Recife-Brazil
     
Jan 22, 2018 10:14 |  #13

icor1031 wrote in post #18546387 (external link)
Direct the background light more toward the background?...

Also, you're saying to place the hair light in front of her, instead of behind?

1.> yes, lessen the highlights at the rear of her head/hair
2.> try and get the light to 'run-off' her hair "camera-right" so that this main-body-of-hair is illuminated and thus appreciated!
to do this, if you have a snoot and grid available, you will see the magic happen!
Try and add a modifier to a light source positioned camera-right at a height of 7'+ pointing down towards her left-side

For me, your original photo was more than good enough!
It is just my preference to illuminate the main body of hair always.
a.) you capture the shape of the head better
b.) the hair is a significant part of the overall portrait and should be prominent
c.) the model has really lush hair that should be exposed a bit more


"... with a clear perspective - the confusion is clearer ..."
Body: < changing >
Lenses: 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM, 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM
Flashguns: 580ex II x 4, MT24 macro flash
Accessories: Pkt Wiz TT5 x 5, AC3 x 2, MiniTT1 x 2, Sekonic L-758DR
Studio Lights: Godox ADpro x 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,611 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8357
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Jan 23, 2018 23:10 |  #14

I really like this lighting a lot. . I wouldn't want to change it at all.

It is very nice and even, which works great with this kind of background.

Very nicely done.


.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rosh4u
Member
Avatar
185 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Jun 2017
Location: Surat, India
     
Jan 23, 2018 23:49 |  #15

I didn't find any lighting missing. It's good overall.


Roshni Patel Co-founder of Auto Stamper (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,755 views & 7 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 4 members.
Critique Lighting
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1328 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.