Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 01 Feb 2018 (Thursday) 04:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Is there a section for film shooters?

 
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,902 posts
Likes: 2666
Joined Oct 2015
     
Feb 01, 2018 04:22 |  #1

If there is, help me out, please. I can't seem to find it.


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
apersson850
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,823 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Feb 01, 2018 04:35 |  #2

Since the headline is "Digital Photography Forums", I would be surprised if here is any.
But if it's camera related, Canon's EOS cameras have many similarities, regardless of how the images are stored.
And if it's related to the film only, you don't need to go to a specific camera forum.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,902 posts
Likes: 2666
Joined Oct 2015
     
Feb 01, 2018 05:00 |  #3

Thanks. I'm just interested in opinions on paying a developer to scan versus doing it myself. Quality, cost and related factors. What is a decent film scanner? Flatbed or dedicated 35mm? Scan prints or negatives? What if I want to scan some 4"x6" prints. That kind of stuff.


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,823 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Feb 01, 2018 05:17 |  #4

Well, that's kind of borderline between film and digital. Try asking in the postprocessing forum, perhaps. That's what I would do, if I had to ask the question here.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
8,065 posts
Likes: 502
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Feb 01, 2018 06:51 |  #5

Bassat wrote in post #18553903 (external link)
Thanks. I'm just interested in opinions on paying a developer to scan versus doing it myself. Quality, cost and related factors. What is a decent film scanner? Flatbed or dedicated 35mm? Scan prints or negatives? What if I want to scan some 4"x6" prints. That kind of stuff.

You might want to check the B&H scanner guide at https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com …uying-guide/film-scanners (external link). I personally bought an Epson V700 scanner but found it to be slow for print scanning. However, I was primarily scanning slides, which it would do 12 at a time so it wasn't too bad for my specific purposes. When I was done I sold the unit on eBay and got almost what I paid. In that regard Epson has a refurb store and the stuff is top quality. There are some cheaper models and primarily they get you a smaller scan bed so you do less slides negatives in a batch.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photosbytw
Goldmember
Avatar
1,280 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 954
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains
     
Feb 01, 2018 07:07 as a reply to  @ Bassat's post |  #6

I shoot film(as well as digital) and own an Epson V600(absolutely love it) scanner. I have the rolls developed but don't have the images printed. I scan them to my computer for editing. I'm able to scan 35mm and medium format film up to 6x22cm.


Don't even begin to think I'm criticizing your images.
Just a natural curiosity.
tw
www.photosbytw.net

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,902 posts
Likes: 2666
Joined Oct 2015
     
Feb 01, 2018 07:14 |  #7

photosbytw wrote in post #18553937 (external link)
I shoot film(as well as digital) and own an Epson V600(absolutely love it) scanner. I have the rolls developed but don't have the images printed. I scan them to my computer for editing. I'm able to scan 35mm and medium format film up to 6x22cm.

How much work is involved in turning a negative scan into useable image?


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,902 posts
Likes: 2666
Joined Oct 2015
     
Feb 01, 2018 07:29 |  #8

I'm not sure I want to get into scanning negatives and dealing with the extra PP involved. That is my prime motivation for paying the developer for scan. I can use the flatbed I already own (HP Envy 5660) to scan prints. I've been messing with it a bit and 600 dpi seems about right. But the IQ varies A LOT, depending on the photo I am scanning. I'm just going to mess around for a while, trying different stuff to see what I like. The last time I shot film was back in the Stone Age (2008?), when you could drop off film and CVS, do some shopping and pick up your prints before you went home (and they gave you the negatives!). TheDarkRoom.com will return my negatives. That is a good reason to start with them.


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photosbytw
Goldmember
Avatar
1,280 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 954
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains
     
Feb 01, 2018 07:36 |  #9

Bassat wrote in post #18553939 (external link)
How much work is involved in turning a negative scan into useable image?

Usually no more than shooting digitally as long as you "get it right" when shooting. That said, I shoot exclusively B&W film, tho I also scan old 35mm color slides which entail additional editing as they tend to have scratches, dirt, mold and other blemishes that need attention. There is software (Digital ICE) included to limit or remove scratches and dirt.........but it's not perfect.


Don't even begin to think I'm criticizing your images.
Just a natural curiosity.
tw
www.photosbytw.net

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,902 posts
Likes: 2666
Joined Oct 2015
     
Feb 01, 2018 07:42 |  #10

photosbytw wrote in post #18553946 (external link)
Usually no more than shooting digitally as long as you "get it right" when shooting. That said, I shoot exclusively B&W film, tho I also scan old 35mm color slides which entail additional editing as they tend to have scratches, dirt, mold and other blemishes that need attention. There is software (Digital ICE) included to limit or remove scratches and dirt.........but it's not perfect.

B&W and slides do not have the orange cast of color negative film. THAT has got to be a hurdle!


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DaviSto
... sorry. I got carried away!
Avatar
1,927 posts
Gallery: 56 photos
Likes: 888
Joined Nov 2016
Location: Abuja Nigeria
     
Feb 01, 2018 07:43 |  #11

Try this:

https://photography-on-the.net …hread.php?t=727​911&page=1


David.
Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
THREAD ­ STARTER
"I am still in my underwear."
Avatar
7,902 posts
Likes: 2666
Joined Oct 2015
     
Feb 01, 2018 07:46 as a reply to  @ DaviSto's post |  #12

Thanks. I'll search that thread. Gotta be some relevant stuff in 300+ pages!


Tom

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photosbytw
Goldmember
Avatar
1,280 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 954
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains
     
Feb 01, 2018 07:46 |  #13

Bassat wrote in post #18553945 (external link)
I'm not sure I want to get into scanning negatives and dealing with the extra PP involved. That is my prime motivation for paying the developer for scan. I can use the flatbed I already own (HP Envy 5660) to scan prints. I've been messing with it a bit and 600 dpi seems about right. But the IQ varies A LOT, depending on the photo I am scanning. I'm just going to mess around for a while, trying different stuff to see what I like. The last time I shot film was back in the Stone Age (2008?), when you could drop off film and CVS, do some shopping and pick up your prints before you went home (and they gave you the negatives!). TheDarkRoom.com will return my negatives. That is a good reason to start with them.

I understand but I find that there is consistency when you have someone else develop your film which is why photographers did/do developed their own film. PP is is not time consuming for me as I just tweek the exposure and do a little D&B............and if necessary, I can batch process the images.


Don't even begin to think I'm criticizing your images.
Just a natural curiosity.
tw
www.photosbytw.net

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photosbytw
Goldmember
Avatar
1,280 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 954
Joined Jan 2015
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains
Post edited 6 months ago by photosbytw.
     
Feb 01, 2018 07:49 |  #14

Bassat wrote in post #18553948 (external link)
B&W and slides do not have the orange cast of color negative film. THAT has got to be a hurdle!

Ahh............I don't shoot color..............I have never liked it and it doesn't age well...........oops, I'm referring to film that is.


Don't even begin to think I'm criticizing your images.
Just a natural curiosity.
tw
www.photosbytw.net

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
8,065 posts
Likes: 502
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
Post edited 6 months ago by John from PA.
     
Feb 01, 2018 08:08 |  #15

Bassat wrote in post #18553948 (external link)
B&W and slides do not have the orange cast of color negative film. THAT has got to be a hurdle!

Actually 35mm negative has five color layers that are basically blue, yellow, green, magenta and red and it may vary a bit based on manufacturer. I recall that Fuji film tended to emphasize green so I used it for landscape work. It was said (tongue in cheek) that you could remember that because the box was green vs. Kodak boxes that were usually red and used more for portraits.

Anyway, better scanners include software that automatically remove the orange mask. It isn't the best software but can be upgraded sometimes for a minimal fee. There are even some 3rd party scanning software packages where you tell it the type of film and an embedded profile does the correction.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,997 views & 13 likes for this thread
Is there a section for film shooters?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is dantonpaxton
817 guests, 377 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.