Hello Every body,
do you know anyway to prevent from clipping the highlights with a Canon DLSR ?
I know we can show a warning while we are taking a picture, but I'm looking for a way to calculate the max ISO before it clips...
Any idea ?
Feb 16, 2018 21:33 | #1 Hello Every body, Tristan Quevilly
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JarvisCreativeStudios Goldmember More info | Feb 16, 2018 22:07 | #2 Calculate the max ISO before it clips? This is confusing, especially since you are asking about auto ISO. Up until a certain point (usually 6400 ISO on most cameras out of the box) the camera will choose your ISO for you when you set it on auto ISO. So regardless of your other settings (again, up until a certain point) the camera will make your exposures to what it sees fit when auto ISO is set. WEBSITE
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Feb 16, 2018 22:27 | #3 99% of the time I use full manual, not Auto anything, to take full control of the exposure & suggest that you read this: Need an exposure crutch? FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson More info | Feb 16, 2018 23:08 | #4 all of the 5D cameras have highlight alerts in custom functions. Turn Highlight alert on and the highlights will blink in your viewfinder when you clip them Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Archibald You must be quackers! More info | Feb 16, 2018 23:31 | #5 umphotography wrote in post #18565625 all of the 5D cameras have highlight alerts in custom functions. Turn Highlight alert on and the highlights will blink in your viewfinder when you clip them He said he knew that. Canon R5 and R7, assorted Canon lenses, Sony RX100, Pentax Spotmatic F
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Feb 17, 2018 00:43 | #6
Potentially, if you used Live View the camera could then look at each pixel to determine if any have gone to clipping, even without a stored photo, but then you would need rapid polling of each pixel for clipping status...likely requires more realtime processing than we have battery power to have done for every shot! You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2742 Joined Oct 2015 More info | Feb 17, 2018 08:23 | #7 Permanent banImpossible, quite impossible with the current state of artificial intelligence. Until someone programs a camera that can tell a clipped white wedding dress from a clipped white ceiling/wall, the camera will not be able to help with this. That is the photographer's job.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Obviously it's a good thing More info Post edited over 5 years ago by apersson850. | Feb 17, 2018 08:40 | #8 With today's light metering sensors having resolutions like 360000 pixels, it would be possible to analyze the whole image before shooting, and adjust exposure accordingly. Thus highlight clipping could be avoided. But the main problem is of course to realize that the particular small reflection of the sun in a window should perhaps not be regarded, since it renders the rest of the image black. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bassat "I am still in my underwear." 8,075 posts Likes: 2742 Joined Oct 2015 More info | Feb 17, 2018 08:42 | #9 Permanent banapersson850 wrote in post #18565816 With today's light metering sensors having resolutions like 360000 pixels, it would be possible to analyze the whold image before shooting, and adjust exposure accordingly. Thus highlight clipping could be avoided. But the main problem is of course to realize that the particular small reflection of the sun in a window should perhaps not be regarded, since it renders the rest of the image black. Which is exactly why the photographer matters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson More info Post edited over 5 years ago by umphotography. | Best way is to use Auto modes with exposure compensation set at zero Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 08, 2018 14:06 | #11 Thanks a lot everybody for your answers ! There are nice advises ! Tristan Quevilly
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks dude, I will try this method ! It should work well Tristan Quevilly
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yes totally, these kind of situations would complicate the task for an auto mode. Maybe to allow a kind of tolerance for sun, and bulbs... Tristan Quevilly
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yes checking in live view is a solution. Well there several methods. But I just wondering what is the fastest one ! Tristan Quevilly
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yes this is the function that is missing in Canon's cameras. I think it shouldn't be so complicated to create. Tristan Quevilly
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1681 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||