Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 20 Feb 2018 (Tuesday) 21:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Who has replaced 24-105 v.i and with what?

 
notastockpikr
Senior Member
395 posts
Likes: 47
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Canada
     
Feb 27, 2018 07:24 |  #16

Sold the 24-105 v1 in anticipation of a better v2.....won't do that again(sell something based on rumours). Had the 24-70 2.8 II and didn't replace the 24-105 v1. Just use the 24-70 II more.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
That's my line!
Avatar
8,345 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 1648
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Post edited 3 months ago by Left Handed Brisket.
     
Feb 27, 2018 07:32 |  #17

i have thought about this question quite a bit for my own kit.

IMO, the only worthwhile replacement is a 24-70 2.8 II or maybe one of the newest third party versions of the 24-70 2.8.


that said, I have the tokina 16-28 2.8 and the sigma 35 1.4 A for most wide shots where the 24-105 suffers. The 24-105 is my hiking and flash-assist event lens. It's a decent lens and for the current used asking price is a bargain.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Patrick ­ H
Member
116 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2013
     
Mar 04, 2018 19:27 |  #18

My vote is for the 24-105ii. Best imperfect lens.


5D mkIV | 35Lii | 135L | + some zooms.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
txsizzler
Member
Avatar
75 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 148
Joined Jan 2017
Location: South Texas
     
Mar 04, 2018 19:30 |  #19

I replaced mine with the 24-70 f/2.8 L II lens. Remarkable upgrade in IQ, but with the added cost of weight (not to mention $$$), and lack of IS. Love the colors/contrast, and incredible sharpness of the 24-70!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
puttick
Senior Member
Avatar
809 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 17
Joined Mar 2002
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Post edited 3 months ago by puttick. (2 edits in all)
     
Mar 07, 2018 06:09 |  #20

Surely the biggest issue when replacing any 24-105 with any 24-70 is the loss of the 70-105mm range! For me, that's essential in an everyday or travel lens, even though I have a 70-200, as it means fewer lens changes. I tried a 24-70 and found the need to change lenses just to get to say 100mm really annoying. For most travel photography, especially in a city, I can leave the 70-200 behind. I can also shoot portraits at 105mm.

I've had the 24-105 v1 for several years, and mostly very happy with it. I have just replaced it with the v2. Optically the v2 is a little better (on a 5D4), especially at the edges at 24mm, but the IS is noticeably better, and the AF seems quicker. It's a bit heavier than the v1, but a 5D4 with any zoom lens is not a lightweight camera to begin with. On the v1 I had really annoying zoom creep which was a pain when using on a tripod if pointing up or down.

I do have the 24-70 f4 L IS and it's a fine lens, though it lacks the range I need. I have no experience of the Tamron 24-70 or other 3rd party lenses, and have generally avoided them as they so often end up needing updates, and the resale value is definitely less! Like you I also have primes in this range, and use them when I'm spending time doing "slow" photography - on a location, tripod mounted etc, or when I need the wider aperture.

It's important not to be carried away with reading lens test reports, try to find a real-world user test which gives you an opinion from a photographer who has actually used it to take photographs over an extended period, preferably your kind of photographs. Very few actual user opinions out there for the 24-105v2 as yet.


Nigel Puttick
North Yorkshire, UK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,815 views & 6 likes for this thread
Who has replaced 24-105 v.i and with what?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Dave-DMS
841 guests, 395 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.