Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 26 Feb 2018 (Monday) 00:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon EOS M50

 
rh18
Member
Avatar
217 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 153
Joined May 2011
Location: NC, USA
     
Apr 23, 2019 20:02 |  #421

I wish I had more detail in the sky but it was a bright day and I overexposed it a bit.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Gear and Feedback | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Tounis
Senior Member
Avatar
261 posts
Gallery: 91 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1494
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Switzerland
     
Apr 25, 2019 15:41 |  #422

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/46783056855_df57883774_h.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2eh4​oUx  (external link) Fribourg (external link) by Pierre (external link), on Flickr

Pierre
My Flickr gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amairphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,002 posts
Gallery: 69 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 4395
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas
     
Apr 27, 2019 15:29 |  #423

rh18 wrote in post #18850532 (external link)
I wish I had more detail in the sky but it was a bright day and I overexposed it a bit.

thumbnail
Hosted photo: posted by rh18 in
./showthread.php?p=188​50532&i=i177204340
forum: Canon EOS Digital Cameras

I just finally invested in a GND. I am off to Yosemite and used for another shoot in the mountains of sheer shearing.... That GND saved my butt a few times and it was well worth the money.


My Website: http://www.amairphoto.​com (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trout ­ Bum
Senior Member
614 posts
Gallery: 140 photos
Likes: 1134
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Idaho, USA
     
Apr 28, 2019 17:35 |  #424


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Mark
My photography website (external link)
My fine art website (external link)
My youtube channel (external link)
Instagram: @MarkMilleArt

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
reietto
Member
Avatar
218 posts
Gallery: 123 photos
Likes: 721
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Sardinia, Italy
     
May 11, 2019 15:16 |  #425

Hi guys,
I'm on the brink to make the decision to buy the M50 but I'm torn about the 15-45 lens kit because I think that it can be a little dark and slow due to his f3.5-5.6 aperture. What do you think about this lens? I'm also thinking that I'll give it a try and if I'm not pleased with the result I'd go with the 17-55 Canon with the adapter o even better the 24-105 with the Viltrox adapter. What do you think?


Cris
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/reietto-es/ (external link)
Instagram (external link)
Canon Eos M50 - Canon EF-M 15-45 - Canon EF-M 11-22 IS STM - Canon EF-S 55-250 IS STM - Canon EF 50mm f1.8 STM - Mount Adapter EF-EOS M - Metz 44 AF-1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,635 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 377
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
May 11, 2019 17:05 |  #426

reietto wrote in post #18859920 (external link)
Hi guys,
I'm on the brink to make the decision to buy the M50 but I'm torn about the 15-45 lens kit because I think that it can be a little dark and slow due to his f3.5-5.6 aperture. What do you think about this lens? I'm also thinking that I'll give it a try and if I'm not pleased with the result I'd go with the 17-55 Canon with the adapter o even better the 24-105 with the Viltrox adapter. What do you think?

I used (actually still use) my 60D, a APS-C camera with the 18-200, a f3.5-5.6 lens (as are all 18-xx lenses) very successfully in all kinds of light. I'd stick to the EF-M lenses, if you want to take advantage of the diminutive size of the camera. I think that a M50 + lens adapter + 18-200 would be ridiculous and the 24-105 might even be worse, in terms of size.

Here is the 18-200 at work in low light:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


...and the nifty-fifty, a small enough prime to work with the size of the M50


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Gerry
Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
38,103 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 6686
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
Post edited over 1 year ago by TeamSpeed.
     
May 11, 2019 19:40 |  #427

The 14-45 is a nice compact lens and has a place in the bag, especially with the 14mm. The decision is more dependent on what you are shooting, the lens won't be great in a bar or drama event for example.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
For Sale: Sigma USB Dock

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
reietto
Member
Avatar
218 posts
Gallery: 123 photos
Likes: 721
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Sardinia, Italy
     
May 12, 2019 01:33 |  #428

Thank you both for the answers.

@MakisM1: I own the nifty-fifty and I look forward to try it with the M50. I think that is gonna be a great combination. I had a Sigma 18-200 on my first dslr 450d(one of the rebels in other regions I think) and despite was a good walkaround lens it was too dark in comparison to my Tammy 17-50 f2.8. It is also true that my 450d was a mess from 800 iso and above so I think that the M50 it might be definitely better. I agree with that the combination of M50+adapter+24-105/17-55/18-200(approximately same size and weight) can be huge and it can result in a loss of the advantage of the size of the camera but I'm also concern about till now I saw that the most owners of the camera using it with their EF/EF-S lenses. Is that because the kit lens is not good enough or just the lack of good EF-M mount lens? As I said before I'll give it a try than I decide what to do.

@TeamSpeed: I love landscape and architecture photography but sometimes during my trips I love doing street and candid. In fact I'm going to replace my 10-18 with the EF-M 11-22, gonna try the 15-45 and what can you suggest for a range till 200/300? Should I try the 55-200 EF-M?


Cris
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/reietto-es/ (external link)
Instagram (external link)
Canon Eos M50 - Canon EF-M 15-45 - Canon EF-M 11-22 IS STM - Canon EF-S 55-250 IS STM - Canon EF 50mm f1.8 STM - Mount Adapter EF-EOS M - Metz 44 AF-1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,238 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Likes: 335
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan
     
May 13, 2019 21:03 |  #429

reietto wrote in post #18859920 (external link)
Hi guys,
I'm on the brink to make the decision to buy the M50 but I'm torn about the 15-45 lens kit because I think that it can be a little dark and slow due to his f3.5-5.6 aperture. What do you think about this lens? I'm also thinking that I'll give it a try and if I'm not pleased with the result I'd go with the 17-55 Canon with the adapter o even better the 24-105 with the Viltrox adapter. What do you think?

I bought the M50 for its compactness, so the 15-45mm works for me as an outdoor walk around lens. I also have the 22mm f/2 pancake for indoor use, as well as the 11-22mm and 55-200mm EF-M lenses. The entire kit fits in a small camera bag, and is great for traveling light. If I am going to walk around with one of my big EF lenses, I may as well just bring my 5D3 or 7D2 instead of the M50.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
38,103 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 6686
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
May 13, 2019 21:18 as a reply to  @ reietto's post |  #430

I use the 55-200. After that I pull out my speedbooster or EF adapter and use my other lenses.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
For Sale: Sigma USB Dock

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
reietto
Member
Avatar
218 posts
Gallery: 123 photos
Likes: 721
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Sardinia, Italy
     
May 13, 2019 23:26 |  #431

Thank you both for answering my questions.

I think that I'm going to buy the 55-200 or maybe the 55-250 STM with the adapter which is only 100gr heavier.


Cris
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/reietto-es/ (external link)
Instagram (external link)
Canon Eos M50 - Canon EF-M 15-45 - Canon EF-M 11-22 IS STM - Canon EF-S 55-250 IS STM - Canon EF 50mm f1.8 STM - Mount Adapter EF-EOS M - Metz 44 AF-1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crofter
Senior Member
369 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 327
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Weardale UK
     
May 14, 2019 00:42 |  #432

reietto wrote in post #18861058 (external link)
Thank you both for answering my questions.

I think that I'm going to buy the 55-200 or maybe the 55-250 STM with the adapter which is only 100gr heavier.

Both good to use on the M50,you can get the Kenko 1.4x teleconverter (HD version not the new HD Pro) that fits the Efs-55-250,this will focus on the M and the results aren't bad at all in good light.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/70718847@N02/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zombo73
Member
Avatar
139 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Likes: 382
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Michigan, USA
     
May 14, 2019 21:29 |  #433

Took the M50 out to the pitch....


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Trout ­ Bum
Senior Member
614 posts
Gallery: 140 photos
Likes: 1134
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Idaho, USA
     
May 15, 2019 21:40 |  #434

In the POTN tradition:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Mark
My photography website (external link)
My fine art website (external link)
My youtube channel (external link)
Instagram: @MarkMilleArt

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AnnieMacD
Oops, me again
Avatar
4,216 posts
Gallery: 808 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 10159
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Applecross, Scotland
     
May 19, 2019 15:36 |  #435

IMAGE: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/47883529691_552ed81c34_h.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/2fXi​B98  (external link) Triptych - taking the dog for a walk (external link) by Annie MacDonald (external link), on Flickr

I'm not crazy about the 15-45 (the one I have is f6.3 at the long end) but I really love the 32mm f/1.4. However, this was taken with the kit lens but I don't get nearly as many keepers. Part of the reason is I need to use slower shutter speeds due to the 6.3 max aperture and it's not as sharp a lens. I so wish I did not get the kit lens as I could have done with just the 32mm and 22mm and/or used the adapter. The kit lens is small and light though but a bit tacky as the housing is all plastic.

flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

154,951 views & 841 likes for this thread
Canon EOS M50
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is holmesidepi
862 guests, 284 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.