MakisM1 wrote in post #19128463
TS, I have a question for you.
My travel kit is my old 60D, EF-S 18-200, Sigma 8-16. The EF-S 18-200 is a pretty sharp copy and the Σ 8-16 is stellar.
Does it make sense to get an EOS M50 with the adapter for EF-S to replace my 60D?
I know the form is a lot smaller.
Is the sensor significantly better?
Is it noticeably lighter?
Is it worth it?
The camera is significantly smaller than the 60D. However I would only suggest moving to the M50 if you plan on getting a few small EFM mount lenses for travel. I have both EFM and then 2 EF adapters (normal commlite EF to EFM, and viltrox EF speedbooster) for my EF lenses, but if I travel, I usually take 3 of my EFM lenses.
If you are going to use all EF/EFS lenses on the M50, then maybe the move isn't worth it, at least not for a size advantage.
The resolution is nice (18 to 24), and the IQ is definitely a bit better. Also, you are able to AF with 1.4x TCs on some lenses, and the speedbooster with fast EF prime lenses is pretty amazing. It is a good tool to try out Canon mirrorless without spending alot.