I'm using the Canon 16-35 f4, 50 f1.4 and 70-200 f2.8 IS II. I just want to make sure I like the way the A7 feels before I sell all my Canon gear.
I'm using the Canon 16-35 f4, 50 f1.4 and 70-200 f2.8 IS II. I just want to make sure I like the way the A7 feels before I sell all my Canon gear. JohnBphotography.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard"  More info | Mar 02, 2019 09:05 | #722 showtm490 wrote in post #18821461  I'm using the Canon 16-35 f4, 50 f1.4 and 70-200 f2.8 IS II. I just want to make sure I like the way the A7 feels before I sell all my Canon gear. That's how a lot of us got here. Start with a Sony and adapt EF lenses. Eventually if you like the Sony you will wind up with a lot of FE lenses. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlanU Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 02, 2019 09:34 | #723 showtm490 wrote in post #18821461 I'm using the Canon 16-35 f4, 50 f1.4 and 70-200 f2.8 IS II. I just want to make sure I like the way the A7 feels before I sell all my Canon gear.
5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 03, 2019 14:36 | #725 71sbeetle wrote in post #18821826 I just picked up the Sigma 60-600 to replace my Sony 100-400 GM, since it doesn't come in Sony mount I bought the Canon version with an MC-11, the MC-11 does seem to work better than the one I had last year! I'm debating between the 70-200 2.8 or the 100-400. The 2.8 I need for night stuff but would love the reach of the 400 for shooting sports. JohnBphotography.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nburwell Goldmember  1,265 posts Likes: 11 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Wilmington, DE More info | Mar 28, 2019 14:33 | #726 showtm490 wrote in post #18821110 I'll be joining the club next week as I ordered my A7 III today from greentoe. Which lens adapter do you recommend for my Canon lenses? I'm going to rent one before buying Sony lenses. I have the Sigma MC-11 which does a pretty good job with my Canon lenses. I tried the Metabones V adapter as well. It was good, but I just couldn't justify the cost, especially when I felt the MC-11 was just as good and not nearly as expensive.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 28, 2019 16:11 | #727 Last year when I got the A7III I got the MC-11 and the Metabones V, I much preferred the MBV over the MC-11. Since I got the 60-600 I've been shooting with the MC-11 and the only issue I have is the lens sometimes loses communication with the body (A7III and A9) where I have to "twist" it on the adapter to make it work again. Of course this has happened during critical moments. Blue Angels flying low over the Las Vegas strip ...... yep, that was a mess and I missed my shots completely. Home run hit during a game ...... yep, lens decided to stop focusing ..... gareymartin.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smmokan Goldmember  1,204 posts Likes: 143 Joined Jan 2009 Location: Boulder, CO More info | Mar 29, 2019 09:13 | #728 I'd recommend the Sigma MC-11 adapter, personally. I've put it through the wringer with my Canon 70-200 f/4L IS lens (on the A7iii) and it shines. No issues with AF-C in either Lock-On AF or Flexible Spot AF, other than a couple instances when the lens was zoomed all the way out to 200mm. Here are a couple of examples, with the mountain bike rider coming straight at me at around 15mph, and not in a straight line. The camera nailed the focus on virtually every shot in each sequence (first one using Lock-On, second FS).   And this one was just with Flexible Spot AF with AF-C:  Since I already have the Canon 70-200, I'm not sure why I would ever upgrade to the Sony version. IQ and focus is just as good, it's way cheaper, and it's lighter too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mondayshift Goldmember  2,301 posts Likes: 730 Joined Apr 2011 Location: NC More info | Mar 31, 2019 18:09 | #729 “Sucking at something is the first step towards being sorta good at something.”
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Roush611 Member 61 posts Likes: 25 Joined Feb 2012 More info Post edited over 4 years ago by Roush611. | Apr 03, 2019 22:39 | #730 Getting use to my new a7III  82A05D28-8C08-46F3-9564-C1556C5C3314 by James Dougherty, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!"  More info | Apr 08, 2019 05:42 | #731  Turkey 1 by Trevor H, on Flickr Turkey 2 by Trevor H, on Flickr Turkey 3 by Trevor H, on FlickrGear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 14, 2019 16:52 | #732 JohnBphotography.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 15, 2019 10:53 | #733 Anyone tried the new 3.0 firmware update only to have it fail? I've tried a dozen times. A dozen different ways with a dozen different cables and I can not for the life of me get the update to take. Darrell
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosByDlee Cream of the Crop  More info | Apr 15, 2019 15:55 | #734 dhornick wrote in post #18845961 Anyone tried the new 3.0 firmware update only to have it fail? I've tried a dozen times. A dozen different ways with a dozen different cables and I can not for the life of me get the update to take. MacBook Pro laptop, LCD on back of A7III says connect. However, when I then open the software updated and run the update, it says can not connect. Is your camera in Mass Storage mode? Sony Alpha A7 Mark IV - Sony FE PZ 16-35mm f/4 G - Sony FE 35mm f/1.4 GM - Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DN Art - Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro - Sigma 50mm f/2 DG DN
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yes sir. Each of the 15 attempts. Checked it each time. Darrell
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1288 guests, 162 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
