.,k
NullMember Goldmember 3,019 posts Likes: 1130 Joined Nov 2009 More info Post edited over 3 years ago by NullMember. (2 edits in all) | Apr 29, 2018 03:28 | #1 Permanently.,k
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joeseph "smells like turd" More info | Apr 29, 2018 03:39 | #2 they're as accurate as can be - at the exact specific time the test was taken. some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ltdave it looks like im post #19,016 5,678 posts Gallery: 24 photos Likes: 8537 Joined Apr 2012 Location: the farthest point east in michigan More info Post edited over 5 years ago by Ltdave. | Apr 29, 2018 13:20 | #3 i sometimes run ethernet (10/100) on a Cat5e cable and ive gotten slower speeds through it than through WiFi... Image hosted by forum (911114) © Ltdave [SHARE LINK] on Cat5eTHIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (911115) © Ltdave [SHARE LINK] on WiFiTHIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. -im just trying. sometimes i succeed
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheNinja117 Hatchling 7 posts Likes: 4 Joined Apr 2018 More info | Apr 30, 2018 02:24 | #4 The tests will always vary as you are transmitting data through an infrastructure that is dealing with hell of a lot of other data at the same time, and then there are a lot of variables at play including the processing speed of your own computer, and the harddisk and the network transmission and so on.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joeseph "smells like turd" More info | Apr 30, 2018 03:25 | #5 TheNinja117 wrote in post #18616381 The tests will always vary as you are transmitting data through an infrastructure that is dealing with hell of a lot of other data at the same time, and then there are a lot of variables at play including the processing speed of your own computer, and the harddisk and the network transmission and so on. Hence, it's impossible to get same figures in all tests, and a variance between 0.5GB - 7 - 8GB is quite normal. GB? some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigAl007 Cream of the Crop 8,118 posts Gallery: 556 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 1681 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK. More info | Apr 30, 2018 05:41 | #6 I agree pretty much with what everyone else has said. The one thing that will really vary a lot by the way is the ping time. Ping times have as much to do with the reaction speed of the targeted system as they do with yours and the network connection. One way to check the latency of your home network is to open a command line (DOS) box and manually run the ping command pointed at your router. The router will very often be found on the internal address 192.168.0.0, so: ping 192.168.0.0 should show you the raw results for a set of packets. If that is not the address, it will return all failed attempts, you can usually find the address of the router from the setup instructions that came with it, they do vary. Image hosted by forum (911280) © BigAl007 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. When I got my contract I pretty much only had one choice of ISP that would offer anything other than a limited 2Mb/s service, at a higher cost than the standard service. In one case it was pay premium rate for a limited service while standard was free! So we ended up with the ISP from the Rhubarb Triangle. The connection is very good this morning, just about at the contracted max speed for the non fiber service. Some days the connection is so bad that it feels like dial up again. We are a long way from both the cabinet and the exchange though, and have both an underground, and overhead connection from the cabinet to the house. I sometimes think about changing to the FTTC option, but having spoken to a BT Openreach engineer his opinion was that we were unlikely to see a huge gain in speed from the existing line from the cabinet. Alan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
110yd Senior Member 790 posts Likes: 35 Joined Jan 2005 More info | My two cents.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1410 guests, 114 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||