Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Bags, Backpacks & Cases 
Thread started 30 Apr 2018 (Monday) 16:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lowepro Protactic 450 and current airline carry on restrictions

 
Kasrielle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,160 posts
Gallery: 88 photos
Likes: 147
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Peace Region BC, Canada
     
Apr 30, 2018 16:41 |  #1

I need a new backpack, and I'm looking at the Protactic 450. Has anyone had experience of taking it on a plane (especially internationally as I live in Canada and family live in the states.) I'm concerned about it being over 10" deep, and over 5 lbs empty. I'm also looking at the 350 but it won't hold a 15" laptop...



www.photosbykas.com (external link)
my Flickr Page (external link)
500px.com/Kasrielle (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,258 posts
Likes: 1527
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Apr 30, 2018 20:55 |  #2

Go to https://travel-made-simple.com/carry-on-size-chart/ (external link) and scroll down to the list of airlines with their size/weight limitations. Sorry to say but you might be in trouble with many an airline because of a 9 inch limitation. All too often you will be at the unpredictable whim of the check in counter personnel.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kasrielle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,160 posts
Gallery: 88 photos
Likes: 147
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Peace Region BC, Canada
     
Apr 30, 2018 21:20 |  #3

John from PA wrote in post #18617068 (external link)
Go to https://travel-made-simple.com/carry-on-size-chart/ (external link) and scroll down to the list of airlines with their size/weight limitations. Sorry to say but you might be in trouble with many an airline because of a 9 inch limitation. All too often you will be at the unpredictable whim of the check in counter personnel.

Yeah, that's what I'm afraid of...



www.photosbykas.com (external link)
my Flickr Page (external link)
500px.com/Kasrielle (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cigargreg
Senior Member
Avatar
270 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 84
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Tampa, FL
     
May 01, 2018 09:55 |  #4

I just returned the Protactic 450, I did not like it at all. It has a ton of great reviews but just seemed really cheaply made. Also, I do not think it would have fit under the seat of the airplane.


flickr (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
suave ­ photos
Junior Member
25 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 17
Joined May 2016
     
May 01, 2018 10:56 |  #5

I have this bag and used it once to travel internationally and I dint have any problem.
But unfortunately you know that it all depends on how the airline workers feel that thay!:-(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,258 posts
Likes: 1527
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
May 01, 2018 16:09 |  #6

cigargreg wrote in post #18617377 (external link)
I just returned the Protactic 450, I did not like it at all. It has a ton of great reviews but just seemed really cheaply made. Also, I do not think it would have fit under the seat of the airplane.

Where did you source this bag? At 73% of Amazon respondents giving the bag a 5 it makes me wonder if you got a fake.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cigargreg
Senior Member
Avatar
270 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 84
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Tampa, FL
     
May 01, 2018 21:28 as a reply to  @ John from PA's post |  #7

I got it from Amazon, doesn't mean it couldn't still be fake. The nylon was super thin in some spots, same with the padding. Like I said this bag has mad review people like it. Maybe I'm just use to Think Tank.


flickr (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shaun ­ Liddy
Senior Member
286 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 471
Joined Feb 2016
     
May 02, 2018 16:45 |  #8

I got the x450 and just took if on it's maiden voyage.

The following is in it:

7d mkii attached to Tamron 150-600 G2
5D3 mkiii body
Canon 70-200 F/2.8 V2
Tamron 24-70 G2
Sigma 35 1.4 Art
Tokina 11-20 2.8
Canon 600 flash
Various filters for all the above (4 packs)
Wireless remote trigger
Spare batteries
Laptop
Misc. Stuff

Tripod is strapped to it


It flew as a carry on at South West with no issues.


It was on my back for a 1hr hike. Boy was that heavy climbing in Sedona AZ.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
May 02, 2018 17:15 as a reply to  @ John from PA's post |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

Thanks so much for that link, John!

Looks like my Tenba Shootout Medium (38.1 x 46.99 x 30.48cm) might be too much for Icelandair. Cr@p! I've nothing else. :-(


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kasrielle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,160 posts
Gallery: 88 photos
Likes: 147
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Peace Region BC, Canada
     
May 02, 2018 22:33 |  #10

Alveric wrote in post #18618349 (external link)
Thanks so much for that link, John!

Looks like my Tenba Shootout Medium (38.1 x 46.99 x 30.48cm) might be too much for Icelandair. Cr@p! I've nothing else. :-(

By the Shootout Medium do you mean the 24L? I've started looking at it instead of the Protactic, as it seems to hold as much but with a smaller footprint. (And better straps, and pockets that seem to be more what I want.) B&H has the exterior measurements as 12.0 x 17.5 x 9.0" - smaller than the Protactic and lighter as well. Those measurements are within the limits for Air Canada and other airlines I use. Boy - Icelandair mush have really tight limits!

How do you like the Shootout?



www.photosbykas.com (external link)
my Flickr Page (external link)
500px.com/Kasrielle (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 5 years ago by Alveric.
     
May 03, 2018 00:01 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

My Shootout medium (now discontinued) has been great. I got it in AD 2012, I think and it has performed like a champ, although it is on the heavier side, even empty. It can, however, pack quite a bit of gear: I'm able to fit my 5D2, and several lenses, plus other gear in it. It was my only photo backpack till I purchased a Vanguard Havana 41 for my oncoming trip to Berlin. The Havana turned out to be rather small—I'm regretting I didn't go for the 48 model—, thus, it will go neatly flattened in the checked luggage and I'm taking my Shootout with camera and lenses as carry on. Apparently, Icelandair relaxes their requirements a bit when they're partnered with other airlines, as in my case (hoping), and my Tenba falls within Westjet's requirements.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,258 posts
Likes: 1527
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
Post edited over 5 years ago by John from PA. (3 edits in all)
     
May 03, 2018 03:04 |  #12

Kasrielle wrote in post #18618529 (external link)
By the Shootout Medium do you mean the 24L? I've started looking at it instead of the Protactic, as it seems to hold as much but with a smaller footprint. (And better straps, and pockets that seem to be more what I want.) B&H has the exterior measurements as 12.0 x 17.5 x 9.0" - smaller than the Protactic and lighter as well. Those measurements are within the limits for Air Canada and other airlines I use. Boy - Icelandair mush have really tight limits!

How do you like the Shootout?

The "medium" and the 24L are different. B&H shows the medium at https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com …ackpack_Medium_​Black.html (external link) with exterior dimensions of 15 x 18.5 x 12 inches.

The 24L is part of the "Soltice" series, https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com …e_24l_backpack_​black.html (external link), with exterior dimensions of 12 x 20 x 9 as you mention. For Iceland Air, I think the 9 inch dimension would be an issue since the chart shows 21.6 x 15.7 x 7.8 as the maximum which can be confirmed at https://www.icelandair​.com/support/baggage/a​llowance/ (external link).

Some in the ThinkTank line meet the specs, see https://www.thinktankp​hoto.com …/airport-series-backpacks (external link), specifically something like the Airport Commuter.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kasrielle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,160 posts
Gallery: 88 photos
Likes: 147
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Peace Region BC, Canada
     
May 03, 2018 15:36 |  #13

No, I'm talking about the Tenba Shootout 24L as seen here: https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com …1_shootout_24l_​black.html (external link)

It isn't in the solstice series, it's in the Shootout series. However, it may be a newer model of the one you have. It's only 9" deep, so shoud be fine for air travel.



www.photosbykas.com (external link)
my Flickr Page (external link)
500px.com/Kasrielle (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,496 views & 1 like for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Lowepro Protactic 450 and current airline carry on restrictions
FORUMS General Gear Talk Camera Bags, Backpacks & Cases 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1468 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.